Running dual screens with my 6600


Recommended Posts

Hello all,

Alright so I need a little help no more.

Here's the deal, I've got a nvidia 6600, not the GT one, I'm planning on getting two HP 22" LCD screens which support hdmi. Now I understood that I can output hdmi through dvi with a dvi -> hdmi cable. But since I will be getting two monitors, I am obviously going to use this setup

1 screen connected through VGA --> HDMI cable

1 screen connected through DVI --> HDMI cable

now my question is, will my 6600 be able to output HDMI to both screens? or will it be capable or running HDMI on one of them only?

just a note: I just want display running through the cables, no need for sound.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/665556-running-dual-screens-with-my-6600/
Share on other sites

I don't see the point. VGA is an analog interface that, with the video card, converts digital signal to analog signal via a DAC and outputs to an analog monitor (Or monitor with analog input). A cable with VGA to HDMI wouldn't exist since HDMI is a digital interface, and theoretically it could work with an ADC but then what's the point :s Signal quality loss.

DVI to HDMI is pointless as well, both are digital interface and in your cases occupies the same amount of bandwidth with the difference of a connector, just use standard DVI.

HDMI in your case is either non applicable or just pointless :p

Alright thanks everyone for the help but I'm really confused now

so now once I get both of the screens, how am I to connect them to my gfx card to get the highest picture quality possible with my 6600? I checked my 6600 and it has ONE vga input and ONE dvi input, and not two dvi inputs like Sir Ali stated.

I just googled HP w2207 (that is the one Sir Ali quoted) monitor has both DVI & VGA Sorce

So you could simply connect one LCD via the DVI port on your graphics card and the other via the VGA, its better than trying to convert outputs etc.

Same resolutions yes, quality..more or less the same. The only way you can get two digital outputs is via a new card, not only will conversions not work (e.g. upscaling doesn't make the picture quality HD) but conversions will always result in quality loss. Only way to fix it is by fixing the source...anyway I wouldn't worry that much about it. It shouldn't be that significant.

The HDMI/VGA is a bit sharper.

I might get myself another one. Currently, I'm connecting the one I have using the HDMI cable...I might get the other one with DVI support and not HDMI.

to get the full effect, you need an HDMI out, with an HDMI cable, and an HDMI input for your monitor. Having a VGA and a DVI, means you'll lose that bandwith in the conversion, making it costly and pointless. Just stick with VGA and DVI

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!