Connecting to my University's Network


Recommended Posts

I have quite a bit of experience with Linux, at least enough that I can generally figure any issue out and don't have to ask too many questions, and I currently have Ubuntu installed so I can easily work with my school's development environment.

The school has two wireless networks available: one for guests with no authenticaton (just a prompt for an email address when you first connect), and one for those with school IDs.

The authenticated network is using WPA2 Enterprise, with Dynamic WEP key management and MSCHAPv2 authentication. There is no certificate file at all and we just put in our "UCMNetID" (our ID for use with all the electronic services) and our password.

It all works fine in Windows (I'm dual-booting), but I cannot get it working on Ubuntu. I've re-entered the correct information multiple times, so I'm not simply getting it wrong, and I've even tried Wicd as well just to see if NetworkManager was the problem.

I'm back using NetworkManager now, and I do like that program, so if I could keep it and still solve this problem, that would be great. However, I'm more concerned with simply getting on the correct wireless network here at the school.

And, while trying to figure this problem out, I updated the drivers for my wireless adapter (from linuxwireless.org, iwl4965) and that completely brought my networking to a halt last time. I'm actually on a new installation now because of that.

Thanks in advance :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/665780-connecting-to-my-universitys-network/
Share on other sites

Maybe try Wifi Radar. I had problems ages ago with Ubuntu 7.04 and its version of network manager. Wireless was flakey to say the least. I had much better success using Wifi Radar than Network Manager. I haven't needed it with 8.04, so I can't say for sure how much better than Network Manager it is now, but its worth a shot?

Also, there's a thread somewhere on Ubuntuforums detailing how to get the latest version of Network Manager (to be included in Ibex) to work in 8.04. Apparently there has been many further improvements.

Well, I wouldn't have mucked with drivers unless you verified it could not connect to an open wireless network.

Sounds like it is just a key issue, but I'm not sure.

I reinstalled Ubuntu after messing with the drivers because that caused all of the wireless managers to not even detect any wireless networks. Either way, all I've done on this installation is try out Wicd instead, but I have replaced it with NetworkManager again. Both work on regular, open networks as well as ones secured with a basic WEP key. It's this setup specifically that they're both having difficulties with.

Maybe try Wifi Radar. I had problems ages ago with Ubuntu 7.04 and its version of network manager. Wireless was flakey to say the least. I had much better success using Wifi Radar than Network Manager. I haven't needed it with 8.04, so I can't say for sure how much better than Network Manager it is now, but its worth a shot?

Also, there's a thread somewhere on Ubuntuforums detailing how to get the latest version of Network Manager (to be included in Ibex) to work in 8.04. Apparently there has been many further improvements.

Thanks for the info, I'll probably try Wifi Radar out and see how it does.

Ok, just an update:

Well after reading up a bit it seems that my driver (iwl4965) just has some issues in the 2.6.24 kernel even if I update the driver to the latest version. I have updated to 2.6.26 (with the .5 patch) and I also updated to the NetworkManager 0.7 SVN version. Everything's working great here at home, but I haven't tested it out at school yet. But I'm hopeful because my wireless connection actually seems to work a lot faster here than it did before, so that tells me that I did something right :p

I'll be trying it all out today, so wish me luck!

And here I am, posting from the university's secured wireless network!

It didn't work at first, but when I switched the PEAP Version from 1 to 0 it got on extremely quickly!

Woohoo!

Well thanks :blush:

It really bugs me when there's a problem I can't fix on a computer, and I'm a pretty quick learner, so I can usually figure out and fix any problem I run into... eventually. And it's just a lot of fun to tinker with Linux anyway :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!