Windows Vista x64 and 2GB of RAM


Recommended Posts

Ok... So now I know that the route is clean. I'll just keep XP SP3 for a now (I'm not in a mood of a complete format now) and well you know my PC is great for XP but just good enough for Vista and I'll lose a bit of the responsiveness I'm used to ;)

Honestly...I've run Vista on computers less able than yours, and it has always been more responsive than XP >.>;

I remember a long time ago when XP64 came out, someone once said 32bit applications run on the 64bit o/s as wow (windows on windows) so there is a small proformance decrece. Fr@nky I doubt you will see any diffrance between the two. Don't know if that is still true with vista64?

You could always trial vista64 for 30 days and see what you think of it?

Happily running Vista SP1 x64, but with 8gb ram, so that's nice. The only thing that doesn't work with x64 is my Palm, but I certainly don't hold that against Microsoft. Palm is dead as a company and their refusal to release x64 drivers for the Palm has been the bain of many people's existence for years now.

If you go x64 now, even with only 2gb ram, you are set for the day when you do drop in 4 or 8gb.

I remember a long time ago when XP64 came out, someone once said 32bit applications run on the 64bit o/s as wow (windows on windows) so there is a small proformance decrece. Fr@nky I doubt you will see any diffrance between the two. Don't know if that is still true with vista64?

You could always trial vista64 for 30 days and see what you think of it?

Even though Vista x64 runs 32 bit apps with WOW64, the performance penalty is so small that it's unlikely that you'll notice. Even if you're running benchmarks there may not be a difference, and when there is, it's pretty small.

This is because the 32 bit code executes directly on the processor. Vista isn't emulating a 32 bit processor, it's actually running the code natively.

I'm a big 64-bit fan, but on a 2GB system with no real plan to upgrade it, I would recommend you stick with Vista 32-bit.

Using Server 2008 is a stupid idea. It costs a ton more and is exactly the same code. If you reconfigure Vista SP1 to only use the same default services and settings as Server, you'll have exactly the same system.

As the above poster said, there is no penalty for executing 32-bit code on an x64 version of Windows. However, there is a small bit of overhead for starting the first WOW64 app, and it does mean using a bit more memory if you run 32-bit apps (for instance, you end up loading the 64-bit and 32-bit versions of shell32.dll). That's why Microsoft is encouraging OEMs to ensure that no 32-bit applications run in the start-up path.

There's also additional memory overhead because of larger pointers and certain data structures. On a 4GB system, this is offset by the availability of more RAM and address space. But on a 2GB system you're probably best sticking with 32-bit as the memory overhead will be smaller.

If you go x64 now, even with only 2gb ram, you are set for the day when you do drop in 4 or 8gb.

His motherboard almost certainly will not support 4GB of RAM. So that really isn't a factor.

I'm running Vista x64 SP1 on 2GB of ram with no problems and haven't run into any issues with 32-bit compatibility, either. Super Antispyware causes errors in the event logs cause they haven't upgraded their app for full 64-bit compatibility, but it still works :)

His motherboard almost certainly will not support 4GB of RAM. So that really isn't a factor.

I wouldn't be so sure. we have very similar set ups; my motherboard supports 4GB and was pretty standard at the time.

edit: However, he has 4x512mb so he'd almost certainly have to remove some before adding more.

I have similar (slightly less) as you: AMD 64 3500+, 4x512mb DDR400, ATI x800XL 256mb, same hard drive. I run Vista 64bit and have no complaints, although I should add that I haven't been doing much that's CPU or memory intensive. I'm interested to learn 64bit has higher requirements than 32bit?

@Raa - DDR isn't so cheap!

i have similar specs but i got a 3000+(upgrading it to a 3800+) but i got 4x1024 DDR400 and nvidia Geforce 8600GT 256MB but i can't run vista 64 as my clients i support use 32bit Oses. games are a bit slow but that is because my 17inch lcd 12MS is slow and it has only a VGA connector and the video card has DVI so it is using an adapter to convert the VGA to DVI(getting new lcd DVI soon) and my current cpu is not that good.

@Raa: you can buy cheap ddr on ebay, far cheaper than the local store.

you can buy cheap ddr on ebay, far cheaper than the local store.

Well, second hand will always be cheaper. I keep hearing from people that RAM is really cheap and it IS, if you're buying DDR2. Looking on ebuyer.com,

Value DDR-400 1GB = ?20

Value DDR2-800 1GB = ?12

One app compatibility caveat I forgot about is GameTap. If you have it you will only be able to play old console games and arcade games. The Windows ones will not run due to the encryption driver.

Gametap is about to go belly up, so that may not be a problem.

i have similar specs but i got a 3000+(upgrading it to a 3800+) but i got 4x1024 DDR400 and nvidia Geforce 8600GT 256MB but i can't run vista 64 as my clients i support use 32bit Oses. games are a bit slow but that is because my 17inch lcd 12MS is slow and it has only a VGA connector and the video card has DVI so it is using an adapter to convert the VGA to DVI(getting new lcd DVI soon) and my current cpu is not that good.

@Raa: you can buy cheap ddr on ebay, far cheaper than the local store.

Comma's learn to use them. people migh tdie from lack of oxygen you know.

and your 12ms screen isn't making games slow. That would be your graphics card.

I wouldn't be so sure. we have very similar set ups; my motherboard supports 4GB and was pretty standard at the time.

edit: However, he has 4x512mb so he'd almost certainly have to remove some before adding more.

Generally a CPU like his would mean a motherboard that can only address 4GB of memory. A 4GB address space means you can't actually map 4GB of physical RAM. So the difference between a 32-bit and 64-bit OS is basically moot.

Vista x64 is of course usable on 2GB RAM but I found it was hitting the page file often with more than a few programs open - Firefox, Photoshop, Thunderbird, Pidgin, mIRC, foobar, and Steam.

With 4GB it never hits the page file and as a result the system is much faster, especially when going through directories with a lot of files / thumbnails.

So, IMO, install 32-bit Vista if you only have 2GB. Performance will be decreased by going to x64.

Comma's learn to use them. people migh tdie from lack of oxygen you know.

and your 12ms screen isn't making games slow. That would be your graphics card.

can you explain why my gpu is slowing games down and not my cpu or monitor??it's got good specs it's an EVGA 8600 GT 256MB Superclocked.

Edited by soldier1st
Well lt's get straight to the point... I have the following system:

- Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3800+ Venice (2.4 GHz SINGLE CORE) @ 2.64 GHz

- Memory: Twinmos 4x512MB DDR-400MHz CAS 2.5 @ 440MHz

- Graphics Card: XFX Geforce 6600GT 256MB DDR3

- Hard Drive: Seagate 200GB SATA 7200RPM 8MB Cache

- Soundcard: Realtek ALC850 Onboard

- PSU: Eurotech 460W Silent

As you can see I have 2GB of RAM. I'm wondering is there any disavantage of installing Vista x64 with 2GB of RAM. I mean... the amount of extra memory required by the x64 version would mean that I would have less performance on x64 version than on x86?

I have been switching back and foward between XP and Vista on this machine (but I currently run Vista Home Premium x86 on my laptop for about a year) and settled with XP once SP3 came out. Now I thinking of going back to Vista and I want to know if there's any reason not to choose the 64-bit version with the system above? What should I do?

P.S.: I have all the drivers and all the software I need is either 64-bit compatible or is 64-bit native...

The *disadvantages* of Vista x64 have nothing to do with low amounts of RAM. (Here's a welcome surprise - on supported hardware, the x64 versions truly require no more RAM than the x86 versions. In fact, the x64 versions of Vista actually run better with low amounts of RAM on single-core-yet-x64 processors, such as current-generation Celerons, than the x86 versions.) The sticking point comes with applications and drivers with x64 operating systems, not low amounts of RAM; I've run Vista Ultimate x64 on a single-core Celeron with only 512 MB of RAM, and had better performance than I would with Ultimate x86 on the same hardware.

Since you've solved the driver and application issues, I would recommend x64 over x86. Strange, but true.

the other dude on Quillz's thread said x64 uses 2GB of RAM as a pagefile alone and that 4GB is minimum.

for your current machine install Vista32 w/ SP1 and you should enjoy your machine quite reasonably.

If you're "dying" to go 64bit start with a fresh new build w/ 4GB of RAM; my suggestion.

i disagree with you and the person after you.. i have 2 gigs of ram on a laptop and used x64 ultimate and it ran fine with less that 1 gig for a page file

Vista x64 is of course usable on 2GB RAM but I found it was hitting the page file often with more than a few programs open - Firefox, Photoshop, Thunderbird, Pidgin, mIRC, foobar, and Steam.

With 4GB it never hits the page file and as a result the system is much faster, especially when going through directories with a lot of files / thumbnails.

So, IMO, install 32-bit Vista if you only have 2GB. Performance will be decreased by going to x64.

Surprisingly, I have to disagree. The sticking point with x64 has more to do with driver performance if you run x64 applications. The effects you are stating have to do more with running x86 apps on an x64 OS (the WOW64 subsystem); this is, naturally, eliminated if you instead run 64-bit applications. (The problem there is though x64 versions of browsers, such as Firefox, IE, etc., exist, x64 versions of common browser helper applications and plug-ins largely don't exist; the same is also true with other common applications you mentioned, such as Steam. True x64 versions of these applications would cause what you are experiencing to go away.)

The issue has to do with the application mix, not the amount of RAM.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!