EA has plan to fix Medal of Honor


Recommended Posts

Classic franchise has been "bumpy" admits EA boss

The president of EA Games has admitted that Medal of Honor has taken a bit of a kicking from the competition, but said the company has a plan to fix it.

"Medal of Honor? It's been bumpy, no question about it," he told Gamasutra. "We hope to have a different strategy there that allows us to get back and bring that brand to greatness, and I feel confident that we have some good moves underway there."

Further details aren't forthcoming, although gossip at Leipzig suggested that EA LA are going to follow Call of Duty into the modern battlefield. Which is no surprise at all given the massive success of CoD 4 - but what can they do to top it? If you've got any suggestions, leave us a comment or drop us an email.

Source: OXM

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/666650-ea-has-plan-to-fix-medal-of-honor/
Share on other sites

MoH was definitely one of the first FPS war games I enjoyed, but it was quickly eclipsed by CoD.

Hopefully they do improve it a lot. I would love to see some innovation from somebody in this genre.

For those of you that don't know, or maybe have forgotten. A lot of the guys that started Infinity Ward were the developers of the original Medal of Honor game. Probably why it was one of the last good ones lol.

The only "fix" for the series is to stop making them. WWI and WWII shooters have been done too many times before, and there is nothing new to add to the particular sub-genre.

Edited by spacer
The only "fix" for the series is to stop making them. WWI and WWII shooters have been done too many times before, and there is nothing new to add to the particular sub-genre.

Did you read the OP? They are going for a more modern approach this time. Worked wonders for CoD.

Yes, the general idea was excellent but didn't work at all in game ... like nothing else did.

I think airbourne was just behind it's time. Had it been released 2 years earlier it would of done terrific, but they were a little late in making it, after everyone was tired of WWII shooters.

I really want to see Medal of Honor look more like COD4. That seems to be the new bench mark for shooters

I think airbourne was just behind it's time. Had it been released 2 years earlier it would of done terrific, but they were a little late in making it, after everyone was tired of WWII shooters.

I really want to see Medal of Honor look more like COD4. That seems to be the new bench mark for shooters

I don't want MoH to be similar to CoD4, want it to be different otherwise being more like COD would be slightly boring!

Medal of Honor always stood from some bravado WW2 action. Airborne was just way too bland no matter when it was released, plus had too many over the top unrealistic moments, like those nazi doom troopers able to withstand 200 shots - What the hell was that?!?!

^

So true, but I have to say that even though there were some unrealistic moments, I think Airborne was an awesome game, i think ive played it through like 15 times now..

The only "fix" for the series is to stop making them. WWI and WWII shooters have been done too many times before, and there is nothing new to add to the particular sub-genre.

There is actually one part of the WW2 genre that I have yet to see.

or if someone can point me in that direction

a WW2 with a deep...

German storyline.

as in, main character being a part of the SS or something.

now that would be interesting..

Medal of Honor Allied Assault = AWESOME.

I remember the part where you have to enter a Submarine hangar with fake nazi papers, it was intense, what an awesome game.

There's a level which is exactly what you're describing in CoD1... hm.

Anyway, let's wait and see what EA does.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reshuffles its AI coding team as it struggles to catch Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is already reorganizing the AI coding “strike team” it created roughly two months ago, as it attempts to find ways to close the gap with Anthropic in one of generative AI’s most commercially important areas. According to The Information, Google DeepMind is expanding the team’s focus to include “midtraining,” rather than concentrating only on coding tools and agents. Midtraining takes place after a model’s broad initial training but before the final stages that prepare it to follow instructions and perform specific tasks. In simple terms, it gives developers another opportunity to expose a model to carefully selected data before it is polished for release. That could help Google improve Gemini’s underlying coding abilities instead of relying only on better prompts, interfaces, or post-training. Previous research has found that midtraining can be particularly effective for code and mathematics, where models must move from general language knowledge to more structured tasks. Google reportedly created the original strike team in April. It was led by Google DeepMind research engineer Sebastian Borgeaud, who previously worked on model pretraining, and focused on complex, long-running programming jobs. Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Google DeepMind chief technology officer Koray Kavukcuoglu were also reportedly involved in the effort. DeepMind researchers were said to believe that Anthropic’s coding tools were outperforming Google’s Gemini models, prompting the company to give the project more attention. Anthropic has made coding a central part of its AI strategy through Claude Code and its Claude model family. The company has continued improving that area, with Claude Opus 4.8 offering upgrades for coding and other agentic tasks, along with the now-unavailable Mythos and Fable models. The reshuffle also comes at a time when Google faces increased competition for AI researchers. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer recently announced that he was leaving Google for OpenAI, while two other researchers who contributed to Gemini and DeepMind projects are reportedly preparing to join Anthropic. It remains unclear whether the reorganized team will produce a new public Gemini model or developer product. No release date, team size, or specific performance target has been disclosed. Source: The Information
    • Just remember - Microsoft is a trillion dollar company. They didn't have to raise the price this high. They chose to.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      413
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!