The 65 mpg Ford the U.S. Can't Have


Recommended Posts

Yet how many micro-cars are sold in the UK?

Further, micros in the UK are distinctly classed differently than even subcompacts, and so are regulated differently. Also, aren't most speed-governed (in fact, aren't most vehicles in the EU speed-governed, primarily due to much higher fuel prices)?

No. US servicemen who want to convert their BMW's from German Specs to US spend more than the cars worth to convert, the windshield, headlights and tachometer. then you have to have a govenor installed to keep the car down to US speeds.

US cars couldn't handle the autobahn speeds and died very easily due to the speeds on them.

Also, what about crash-worthiness?

In order for Ford to be able to build (or import) the vehicle into the US, the car must meet crash-worthiness standards. (The Japanese ulta-minis are highly successful in Japan; however, none are available in the US for safety reasons; it's also why the original Mitsubishi Lancer and Nissan Skyline were never imported into the US.)

Fuel-efficient vehicles have issues when it comes to crash-worthiness (historically, subcompact cars as a class have the *worst* insurance rates among non-high-performance vehicles, while SUVs and pickups have some of the best such rates). Also, at least in North America, fuel is cheaper compared to the EU and Japan.

Data point: the GMC Typhoon, the fastest production SUV ever built, remains cheaper to insure than a Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird of the same year, despite actually being faster.

Safety often trumps fuel-efficiency, at least in North America.

They already said they are going to have a gas version in the US, so obviously it meets the standards. In my opinion they are idiots for not building diesels in the us or Mexico for our market.

On caveat of using Diesel is that even the most efficient Diesel engine causes more pollution than Gasoline (petrol) driven engines.

Introduction of Low sulfer diesel will helps a little but Diesel engines have a way to go before becoming more environmentally friendly.

No. US servicemen who want to convert their BMW's from German Specs to US spend more than the cars worth to convert, the windshield, headlights and tachometer. then you have to have a govenor installed to keep the car down to US speeds.

US cars couldn't handle the autobahn speeds and died very easily due to the speeds on them.

Never heard of the governor thing. That doesn't make sense when I could buy a car here that could do 180 MPH plus (about 290 KPH) and many that could easily do Autobahn speeds. I often take my 1999 Chevy Lumina 4 door rather than my wife's 2007 Toyota Camry on long trips since my car gets better mileage...I have a heavy foot and drive 80+ MPH on the interstates when I go to Texas (1200 miles away). Been doing it once a year for years now and so far the ole 3.1 L V6 hasn't blown up yet...146,000 miles on it.

Never heard of the governor thing. That doesn't make sense when I could buy a car here that could do 180 MPH plus (about 290 KPH) and many that could easily do Autobahn speeds. I often take my 1999 Chevy Lumina 4 door rather than my wife's 2007 Toyota Camry on long trips since my car gets better mileage...I have a heavy foot and drive 80+ MPH on the interstates when I go to Texas (1200 miles away). Been doing it once a year for years now and so far the ole 3.1 L V6 hasn't blown up yet...146,000 miles on it.

this reminds me, there used to be a time i think the early or late 80's GM used to make powerful 3+ litre V6 engines that averaged 20+ MPG

they disappeared suddenly, even chrysler had made a few small I4 turbo engines.

No. Look up OPEC it's not just the US- move on.

my statement should read that oil companies are not opec. the oil companies and those damn speculators are the reason for the high gas prices.

Never heard of the governor thing. That doesn't make sense when I could buy a car here that could do 180 MPH plus (about 290 KPH) and many that could easily do Autobahn speeds. I often take my 1999 Chevy Lumina 4 door rather than my wife's 2007 Toyota Camry on long trips since my car gets better mileage...I have a heavy foot and drive 80+ MPH on the interstates when I go to Texas (1200 miles away). Been doing it once a year for years now and so far the ole 3.1 L V6 hasn't blown up yet...146,000 miles on it.

yes. German BMW's can really rip. more so then their counter parts. I knew of a good colleague who did that once with a BMW he owned. that was a major thing for those who owned BMW 500-700 series. those cats romp baby.

what i don't get is why doesn't the government (or a company for that matter) .. make a car (on something other than petrol/diesel) and sell it ...? ... and why is the government so against smaller cars with better mileage ? ... why not research fuel based on algae(we have plenty of those) .... i mean there are so many otehr options than gas ... sun for example ...

what i don't get is why doesn't the government (or a company for that matter) .. make a car (on something other than petrol/diesel) and sell it ...? ... and why is the government so against smaller cars with better mileage ? ... why not research fuel based on algae(we have plenty of those) .... i mean there are so many otehr options than gas ... sun for example ...

Why would the government start a car business? The only one that made sense was volkswagen, but that was a different situation entirely. How is the government against small cars with good mileage? They aren't. Do you realise just how MUCH algae would have to be grown to satisfy demand if everybody drove a car requiring it? FAR more than can be produced. Solar power technology doesn't yield enough power to actually be feasible yet. The ONLY instance I've seen of it being a good solution is a solar powered yacht popular science had an article on where the solar powers were "wings" and could be positioned to catch the wind to propel it. That is the ONLY feasible implementation of solar power I've seen in a vehicle for long term use using the current technology. In order to use solar power in cars we'd need MUCH better batteries and much better solar cells.

Never heard of the governor thing. That doesn't make sense when I could buy a car here that could do 180 MPH plus (about 290 KPH) and many that could easily do Autobahn speeds. I often take my 1999 Chevy Lumina 4 door rather than my wife's 2007 Toyota Camry on long trips since my car gets better mileage...I have a heavy foot and drive 80+ MPH on the interstates when I go to Texas (1200 miles away). Been doing it once a year for years now and so far the ole 3.1 L V6 hasn't blown up yet...146,000 miles on it.

If you go to a private track where no speed limits exist then try to get your car to do 180MPH. Chances are that it will be artificially limited to a lower speed even if the engine is capable of much more.

Never heard of the governor thing. That doesn't make sense when I could buy a car here that could do 180 MPH plus (about 290 KPH) and many that could easily do Autobahn speeds. I often take my 1999 Chevy Lumina 4 door rather than my wife's 2007 Toyota Camry on long trips since my car gets better mileage...I have a heavy foot and drive 80+ MPH on the interstates when I go to Texas (1200 miles away). Been doing it once a year for years now and so far the ole 3.1 L V6 hasn't blown up yet...146,000 miles on it.

Most cars in the 1990's up to now have Governors.

I guarantee that your wife's 2007 Camry wont go above 110 MPH, same goes for the Lumina.

  • 3 weeks later...
Most cars in the 1990's up to now have Governors.

I guarantee that your wife's 2007 Camry wont go above 110 MPH, same goes for the Lumina.

I own a 2000 Acura TL and it does not have a governor or any type of speed restriction device. I have had it way over 110MPH.

I didn't read any replies to this, and just read the part of the article that lies to everyone "Ford's cost-benefit analysis doesn't show them capable of making a profit in the USA with the Fiesta...", I believe it, because Ford is run by a bunch of neenkamputs. But honestly, this is all a red herring, there's soo many Gasoline Lobbyists in America and THAT is the reason they don't want to bring it here is, as Exxon is already paying Ford enough money to keep it out of the states.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      224
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!