Need some car buying advice


Recommended Posts

My wife and I just got married and have moved to Colorado. She drives an old '94 Saturn and we feel it's on its last leg. Even if it still has life in it, I'd like something that is a bit safer for her, and can handle the hills and snow/ice out here. We're looking to spend around $10k. We'd love for it to last several years with limited problems. We're looking at either a small SUV or a no bigger than medium sized sedan.

I have browsed through some classifieds and picked out some vehicles that we'd be interested in. Please let me know what you think of them, and if you have any recommendations, please let me know.

2005 Hyundai Tuscon - $9,900 - 28,800 miles

2005 Nissan Altima - $10,599 - 52,800 miles

2003 Toyota Corolla - $8,999 - 34,500 miles

2002 Jeep Liberty - $9,499 - 48,900 miles

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/667926-need-some-car-buying-advice/
Share on other sites

What do you guys know about the Jeep Liberty? I found another one. 2005 Jeep Liberty Sport - $10,400 - 42,500 miles- bumper to bumper warranty to 80,000 miles.

Also, the Tuscon has a warranty to 60,000 miles.

Thanks for the replies, guys. Keep 'em coming!

What do you guys know about the Jeep Liberty? I found another one. 2005 Jeep Liberty Sport - $10,400 - 42,500 miles- bumper to bumper warranty to 80,000 miles.

Also, the Tuscon has a warranty to 60,000 miles.

Thanks for the replies, guys. Keep 'em coming!

liberty's ok, but it's a gas hog and is a lot tippier than the others. You said you wanted her to be safe, and it's the least safe in the list. It'll be the best on snow and ice, but I still wouldn't choose it.

Altima! i drive a 2005 Altima and i'm coming up on 76,000 miles this week. All i have ever done was oil changes and recently spent $300 to replace all the engine mounts.. wasn't necessary, but i baby my car.

I would think you'd be better off in an AWD car since you have snow, but i don't think you'll find it in the price range.

If you get the Altima make sure the recall service was done, the recall was only for east coast/places where it snows a lot, they just have to replace a metal piece in the rear suspension that's susceptible to rust.

I'll dissent and say go with the Jeep. If you lived almost anywhere else I would have said Altima, but in Colorado you will see deep snow. I lived in Idaho for a while and the ground clearance provided by a "truck" was often the deciding factor more so than traction. I would think the Jeep or a similar SUV with 4x4 would serve you better in Colorado than a car.

Now the other option is some kind of beater 4x4 for the really deep nasty snow and another nice car for the rest of the days. Also consider your commute. Do you live in the sticks or are you in city and expecting promptly plowed roads? Remember in the Rockies their standard of what constitutes "promtly" and "plowed" is a bit different. It is always wonderful to leave your house, realize the road is plowed, but there is now a 3 foot high berm of snow and ice at the end of your driveway.

I'll dissent and say go with the Jeep. If you lived almost anywhere else I would have said Altima, but in Colorado you will see deep snow. I lived in Idaho for a while and the ground clearance provided by a "truck" was often the deciding factor more so than traction. I would think the Jeep or a similar SUV with 4x4 would serve you better in Colorado than a car.

Now the other option is some kind of beater 4x4 for the really deep nasty snow and another nice car for the rest of the days. Also consider your commute. Do you live in the sticks or are you in city and expecting promptly plowed roads? Remember in the Rockies their standard of what constitutes "promtly" and "plowed" is a bit different. It is always wonderful to leave your house, realize the road is plowed, but there is now a 3 foot high berm of snow and ice at the end of your driveway.

The thing is though that the liberty has a short wheelbase and is quite tall. This does not bode well for stability, and trust me I've seen many of these flipped in the ditch.

The thing is though that the liberty has a short wheelbase and is quite tall. This does not bode well for stability, and trust me I've seen many of these flipped in the ditch.

Okay and I hear you. I too distrust the short wheelbase. I still do think it is worth considering something with some more ground clearance for Colorado in the winter than the cars on the list. Maybe not the liberty, but maybe another "SUV" or "truck". I lived in Idaho over 15 years ago so the cars are going to be different now. I got through winter with a 88 s-10 4x4 blazer probably not ideal and again a short wheelbase. The roommates had a 80's daytona and an escort. They did not drive for most of the winter. How about a Subaru Outback as a compromise between car and truck? Their ground clearance is supposed to be decent.

We looked at the Outbacks, but they are a bit harder to find here. Also, the price is a bit high.

It's good to see this many different opinions, but it does make our decision a bit harder. The Liberty is sounding pretty good for around here, mainly for the warranty and the flexibility. We'll hopefully decide in a week or two. Keep the advice coming!

Jeep

Pros:

ground clearance

space

Cons:

horribly cheap interior and parts

gas mileage

value

Nissan

Pros:

styling

value

gas mileage

VQ engine

Cons:

may not be suitable for your winter conditions

i've been in a jeep plenty of times and i hate it every time, i can't stand it.. and i own an Altima :)

We looked at the Outbacks, but they are a bit harder to find here. Also, the price is a bit high.

It's good to see this many different opinions, but it does make our decision a bit harder. The Liberty is sounding pretty good for around here, mainly for the warranty and the flexibility. We'll hopefully decide in a week or two. Keep the advice coming!

Possibly the Outbacks' cousin the Forester. If the wheelbase is the problem with the Liberty, maybe an older Grand Cherokee or Cherokee. There are the various Blazers/Jimmys from Chevy and Ford and Chrysler's comparative line. I'm out of date a bit on trucks and SUV's. I have an International Scout II that is my dedicated trail vehicle/blizzard/zombie outbreak, but that isn't exactly what you are looking for in a daily driver. Are you leaning more towards "car" or "truck"?

We'd definitely lean towards a sedan. The versitility and functionality of a smaller SUV just caught our eye and the price and looks seem right. An Altima, Corolla, etc. would all be welcome. I'm not so sure about a larger Jeep or other SUV.

We mainly want a vehicle to ride higher than her current car for various reasons (comfort, drive, etc.). We want something that is functional, reliable, and preferably pretty nice looking.

We're really leaning towards the smaller SUV type now. Mainly due to 4x4, clearance, and all round versatility. Do you guys think the Jeep Liberty is the right way to go, or do you guys recommend something else in this size? Thanks!

i really dislike the Liberty... if you're going with small SUV i would rather go with a RAV4, maybe CRV. Much better value and the RAV4 is very roomy and nice to drive.

The Ford Escape is not a bad choice either if value is not a big issue for you, they're pretty decent.

So we went test driving some small SUV's. We're going to test drive a VUE tonight, but besides that, the Liberty seemed to be the one the wife liked the most. The only other one in our price range was an Escape, but the interior felt cheap and didn't really offer much more than the Jeep.

The Jeep we are looking at is a 2007 Liberty Sport. It has 39,000 on it. After we test drive the VUE, we will go run numbers for the Liberty. I was wondering if you guys could help me get a feel for how much I should probably pay for in the end, and how much I should expect in fees and whatever other crap they tack on. We got preapproved for an $11,000 loan, but we have a few thousand we're able to get to if/when needed. We also want an extended warranty with it.

So overall, how much do you guys think I can get them down to, and how much should I expect to pay for after fees and such?

Yeah, I'm not sure I can help with specific pricing. Take a look at the Kelly Blue Book for a starting guideline and go from there. Just make sure you are looking at the right category (dealer, buyer and private seller I seem to recall all having their own recommended price) and keep in mind that excellent means showroom quality and good means, damn good and no mechanical defects. Defects get deducted from the starting price. Also keep in mind your location. Cars in general out your way should be cheaper since cost of living is low, but I would imagine Jeeps carry a certain premium in your local economy.

Also I'm sure that there is a Jeep specific forum out there. Surf on over there. Those guys can probably hook you up with a lot more specific info than we can here.

  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!