Will the XBOX 360 Have Enough Games This Holiday?


Recommended Posts

I really don't understand basing the consumer's experience as far as console exclusives. As far as the 360 and PS3, there are so many great 3rd-party games coming out this holiday season that I think everybody wins in the end.

The market as a whole does not own all 3 systems, so for those that can only afford 1 or 2 should still reap the benefits from the 3rd-party multi-platform releases.

And also, just because something is exclusive doesn't mean it's GOOD.

Yes, but using simple logic... if a game is exclusive you can only get it on one console. That is a massive selling point for some people. For example, you wouldn't be able to play Gears of War or Halo 3 (as your gamercard indicates) if you only had a PS3. And, likewise, 360 owners can't play games like Resistance or Metal Gear Solid.

Exclusives are a big deal.

My post was written within the context of the thread title.

I really don't think that the new exclusives this fall/winter will have a lot to do with console sales. The only exclusive title I think will push consoles is Little Big Planet, but other than that I think price has more to do with it than anything else. For those that don't already own a PS3 or XBOX 360 wouldn't really care about any other exclusive coming out for either system...I mean the for the non-hardcore gamer (more than casual gamer)

I honestly think that price has a lot more to do with console sales than exclusives, either price or investment...or even friends that own the same system

With at least the US market, the $199 price is a perfect consumer-friendly price. Most consumers out there don't really think about getting an HDD because they(mostly parents) just see the price and don't think about things like downloadable games or movies. Also, it gives the consumer options on adding on an hdd when the money becomes more readily available for the consumer, or they can just spend $50 more for an hdd sku.

As far as the ps3, parents just see the $399 which is an extrememely non-consumer friendly price. People would pick that up if they (1) consider the blu-ray functionality an investment (2) saved up enough money from the previous years to buy a ps3, which they made a decision to buy since its release or (3) they really want to play Little Big Planet, MGS4, and consider the $399 a good investment for that money.

Another factor in pushing consoles is nagging. And also, word of mouth. If a high-school student or college student, or full-time worker's friends mostly own one system, then that consumer would most be inclined to buy the same system. The problem is that there is more Wii's and 360s sold in the US than PS3's, which means that the likeliness of a non-hardcore gamer to pick up a 360 at $199 or $250 is highly greater because most of his friends own a 360 whom he can play with online or borrow games

My prediction is that the Wii and DS will still smash the competition this holiday season. They are both sold at a consumer-friendly price, and although hardcore gamers don't attach themselves to those systems, the rest of the world does. Most people out there don't play games everyday, so for those people that play once a week or less...they're perfect.

My prediction is that 360 will come in 2nd place because of the new price cut. Not because of the great "exclusive" games coming out this fall, but because they want to play Call of Duty 4 or Halo 3 with their friends on XBOX Live, and can now afford a 360 because it's cheaper.

Prince of Persia

Gears of War 2

Deadspace

Brothers in Arms (maybe waiting reviews first...)

... Tombraider Underworld

not that many..not like last year...

Is that slated to come out this year? I thought that was doomed to a mid 2009 release.

I'm so glad I don't have classes this semester. Bring on the games.

As far as exclusives are concerned, I think the PS3 definitely has a stronger lineup this time around. Gears of War 2 looks amazing, but Left 4 Dead and Red Alert 3 are two games I would much rather play on the PC (console RTS and FPS games will always be inferior to their PC counterparts in my humble opinion). I'm probably going to stay away from Fable 2, since huge time-sinking games are not really my thing. Banjo-Kazooie could be pretty good, though. I haven't read up on it too much, but it's from a good developer.

For me, Wipeout alone puts the PS3 ahead of the 360. The fact that it's also getting Motorstorm 2 and SOCOM is nice as well.

  • 2 months later...

The thing is you can talk about game line up all you like, but the fact is Sony really dropped the ball by not planning a price cut before next April. They're going to miss the major buying season, just look at what happened over the Black Friday weekend for the 360. The PS3s line up just isn't strong enough to shift boxes when going up against the price of the 360, considering the 360s line up is fairly solid anyway.

Also take into account the exclusive dlc for multiplatform games, it gives more reason for people to buy the 360 version.

With people watching their spending these days I think we'll find with the strong line up xbox will fly off the shelves. I find it really bizarre that sony are waiting so long for a cut, I guess they are happy staying 3rd.

The thing is you can talk about game line up all you like, but the fact is Sony really dropped the ball by not planning a price cut before next April. They're going to miss the major buying season, just look at what happened over the Black Friday weekend for the 360. The PS3s line up just isn't strong enough to shift boxes when going up against the price of the 360, considering the 360s line up is fairly solid anyway.

Also take into account the exclusive dlc for multiplatform games, it gives more reason for people to buy the 360 version.

With people watching their spending these days I think we'll find with the strong line up xbox will fly off the shelves. I find it really bizarre that sony are waiting so long for a cut, I guess they are happy staying 3rd.

Not sure what country you are from, but I know in the UK near where I live, most people are buying PS3's rather than 360's right now. There are some great deals about including 2 free games Bluray remote and a Bluray film for ?300. Can count 5 people in my office alone that have purchased a PS3 within the last month. 2 of those already have a 360. But all people are talking about here is the PS3, mainly for what else it offers. But thats all off topic.

As mentioned in most posts some of the titles on the 360 this year are pretty good. Although again quite a few sequels (not that it's always a bad thing) Left4Dead seemed to show promise but from what i've heard it was a slight let down.

As for exclusive DLC on multi platform games, I believe that the PS3 also has that too. Recently with the Challenge Rooms on Bioshock. From what I read in the PS Store it was created for the PS3, not too sure if it was released on the 360.

The price point of the 360 obviously makes it the 'nicer' choice in this current financial climate. But at the end of the day you will find that if kids want a PS3 for Xmas chances are that's what the parents will buy.

Both machines have nice games coming for them so lets all just be happy this Christmas without shooting each other down;))

I think the Christmas line-up for the 360 is a strong one. There are a number of "hardcore gamer" titles, and first time for an Xbox a wide selection of "fun" titles.

Am I the only one whose noticed a trend in Microsoft's new fun line up:

Lips = Singstar

Scene It = Buzz!

At the Movies = Eye Toy

I know I'm looking forward to playing Buzz! this Christmas that's for sure. Best family video game ever! :p

Am I the only one whose noticed a trend in Microsoft's new fun line up:

Lips = Singstar

Scene It = Buzz!

At the Movies = Eye Toy

I know I'm looking forward to playing Buzz! this Christmas that's for sure. Best family video game ever! :p

Heaven forbid you could be implying something :shiftyninja:

I agree though, Buzz is a great family game for those competitive types ;)

I've recently made 5 quizzes on there, just another 15 to make for the trophy lol

Heaven forbid you could be implying something :shiftyninja:

I agree though, Buzz is a great family game for those competitive types ;)

I've recently made 5 quizzes on there, just another 15 to make for the trophy lol

Well unfortunately I think Microsoft's fun clones will probably sell better than Sony's. Microsoft seem to throw lots of money into advertising, whereas Sony don't seem too bothered lately.

Yeah. My girlfriend was quite competitive the last time we played Buzz! with family on the PS2. Needless to say me pressing the wrong button didn't go down too well. :p

I forgot actually. I tried to add you to my PS3 friends list a while back, seems your username was too long or something. :s

Well unfortunately I think Microsoft's fun clones will probably sell better than Sony's. Microsoft seem to throw lots of money into advertising, whereas Sony don't seem too bothered lately.

Wow, that really seems to **** you off. Having a choice is bad now is it?

Eh? I'm not angry about it. I just think Sony should be advertising their products more to compete.

That's a region based issue there. I see Buzz/PS3 ads all the time on the TV, but haven't seen any XBox ones yet.

But I still don't understand why it would be unfortunate for Microsoft's "fun clones" to sell better than Sony's. As long as they both stay on the market, it's very fortunate for us.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!