What is a good ADSL router for 60+ computers

By MaJoR ChAoS
in Smart Home, Network & Security

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

+Tantawi Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

As far as I know there's no 60 port modem + router, so what you really need is a good 1-4 port Gigabit ADSL2+ modem router, and then a/some gigabit switches to make for the 60 ports.

If you need the 60 computer to connect through Wi-Fi then it's easier, and I'm sure someone better than me will recommend a good model for that task.

Enthusiast

MaJoR ChAoS

Posted
  • Author
Posted
As far as I know there's no 60 port modem + router, so what you really need is a good 1-4 port Gigabit ADSL2+ modem router, and then a/some gigabit switches to make for the 60 ports.

If you need the 60 computer to connect through Wi-Fi then it's easier, and I'm sure someone better than me will recommend a good model for that task.

Thanks for the reply, and to the others I should have expalined better.

I'm aware that there aren't 60 port modem, I have cisco switches that can be upgraded to fibre.

We have several rooms that are conected to 1 server (which by the way there are several servers), we are currently using a cheap adsl d-link router.

I am fully aware that 60 computers sharing a adsl link will be slow, but none the less, I am after a a better quality router that will handle anything upto 60 computers web surfing at the same time. I suspect the cheap d-link will crap itself as soon as 15 people connect to web.

We are stuck with adsl so please no comments "dude - upgrade!!!!" this at the moment isn't an option.

Thanks

Ask your project leader.

What a helpful fellow you are :whistle: Why did you waste your time in replying at all?

Rising Star

Grogi

Posted
Posted

I would recommend to put some cheap modem and to configure it as a bridge. Behind that you can put some decent router and configure PPPoE to make connection for all users. Once when you get rid of ADSL you still have good router and you can throw ADSL modem to junk.

Enthusiast

MaJoR ChAoS

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I would recommend to put some cheap modem and to configure it as a bridge. Behind that you can put some decent router and configure PPPoE to make connection for all users. Once when you get rid of ADSL you still have good router and you can throw ADSL modem to junk.

Thanks for the reply, actually I am doing that at the moment and using an SME linux server as a proxy/firewall server.

My problem is that I don't think that the cheap d-link router even in bridge mode can handle dozens of connections from 20 or more computers at once?

Or is it my sme proxy server is taking all the web hits?

Does it even matter what router I use?

My thinking is it must matter, why wouldn't corporations just use cheap $40 d-link modems and put them in bridge mode and have a linux box do all the work. I suspect the adsl modem itself mustn't be able to handle dozens and dozens of web hits? Is this right?

Contributor

Sparky101

Posted
Posted

You could look at some of the Cisco 800 series routers, there are ones with 802.11n, firewall features, ADSL modem, QoS features etc. They will cost you more than a consumer type router but are going to be more scalable. Not sure too many consumer routers will have been tested with 60 PC's connected up to them. There could be issues with the number of NAT translations you've got going on with that number of people using it at the same time.

Proficient

splicer707

Posted
Posted
What a helpful fellow you are :whistle: Why did you waste your time in replying at all?

Didn't mean to be like that. LOL

But really, unless it's some sort of a corporate deployment or a college assignment, who else would ask that question. ;)

You can connect as many devices as you like wirelessly, perhaps with a Next-Gen Wireless-N router. But I can't imagine DSL providing enough bandwidth for 60 computers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By zikalify · Posted

      Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows

      By snowy owl · Posted

      I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature

      By Malisk · Posted

      And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By Steven P. · Posted

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!