Thanks Chevy for the Volt...


Recommended Posts

Do you not realize that the concept Volt was created without the aerodynamics of the body as a consideration in the design? The concept was as aerodynamic as a brick and when your trying to get 40 miles on pure electric you can't have that. If you honestly believed that the final version would look like the concept then you have only yourself to blame because very rarely does a production car look like its original concept stage design where all the practical considerations aren't being factored in.

The very narrow window space in the concept car looks like a distorted caricature of a car. Thin strip of glass above a very wide (tall) body.

The doors had to be modified to be transparent at the top to compensate for what I imagine would otherwise be an obstruction to vision. Clear plastic? Scratches and fog/hazing from UV exposure. Glass? No way. Expensive, certainly.

While the concept looks more aggressive with its squarer front fascia, the more flowing rounded production model is likely more aerodynamic and gets rid of the problematic transparent door sections.

Less of a "WTF?" moment than a more practical build.

Dude you do realize that the appeal of the Volt was probably the styling alone. Now that it's become a Chevy-esque Civic this thread might as well be merged with the "ugliest car" thread.

chevrolet-camaro-concept-5433.jpg

Camero concept is pretty much par with the production. Another thing though, they completely restyled the Volt, took some elements on the concept and slabbed it on an ordinary frame.

Just my opinion anyways.

That's major changes from the Concept.

Still isn't bad looking, just doesn't look as much like a sports car as it once upon a time did. Looks like they decided to go more family oriented than two person sports car.

If you look closely at the concept, it's not a 2 person sports car, it's a 4 door sedan.

Better picture of the concept car: Chevrolet-Volt-DC.jpg

Well I always knew that those glass doors or whatever that is never had a chance of being in the production car.

Apparently sundayx didn't. :p The styling needed to be much more aerodynamic to get the range that people would want demand, too.

The concept Volt now looks like a Malibu Volt production car.... So I would say it's a drastic change.

But everybody was in love with the concept car, even pledging to buy one when it's out (both for look and economic reasons). But now, with the final look, I wonder if it will sell as much. It's going to be a $40K Malibu....

I agree that the concept's look was nice and aggressive, but at a larger expense and with reduced mileage per charge due to poorer aerodynamics.

And cost and traveling distance are more important than "uber cool" looks, imo.

I agree that the concept's look was nice and aggressive, but at a larger expense and with reduced mileage per charge due to poorer aerodynamics.

And cost and traveling distance are more important than "uber cool" looks, imo.

It depends on how much money you have and your amount of concern for the environment. Look at most of the celebrities out there, driving their ub3r c00l hummer limos that get 1 mpg just because they can.

Plus, I like the new design, more than the brick-ish concept. The concept certainly looks "futuristic", but that's on purpose to get people hyped about it.

If you look closely at the concept, it's not a 2 person sports car, it's a 4 door sedan.

<snipped>

The original design was only two doors, I hadn't seen the actual concept car, so my apologies :)

The reasons for the change: "The Volt ... had to be redesigned from the ground up to accommodate the hybrid gasoline-electric propulsion system, as well as for aerodynamic reasons, pedestrian safety and other concerns, GM President Rick Wagoner said as the Volt made its much-anticipated debut."

I suspect they heard a lot of complaints about it only getting 40 miles to the single charge, so they added in a flex fuel system which would allow it to act a standard hybrid vehicle after the 40 miles are up. This is an incredible decision because it actually makes this car more practical.

Apparently sundayx didn't. :p The styling needed to be much more aerodynamic to get the range that people would want demand, too.

I did. I know the difference between a concept and a production model, and as everyone know, there are many things in concepts that do not go into production. The moulded glass is not my concern, nor the slit windows that does not give any visibility.

I just want to say is, by giving us an absolutely stunning EV concept that supposedly revolutionizes the auto-industry, then giving us a production model that is of no promise, I'm just deeply heart-broken. You know the brick like form is not an aerodynamic concern, they could at least followed a justifyable form from the concept. The Camaro is boxy, the Mustang is boxy, but the fact is they are beautiful and offer good performance.

Anyways simply put, IMO the concept is beautiful and the production Volt is fubar.

The Camaro is boxy, the Mustang is boxy, but the fact is they are beautiful and offer good performance.

The Camaro and the Mustang are not concerned with fuel or energy efficiency either. Part of what makes a hybrid car efficient is that they are (usually) very aerodynamic as well. Want an electric sports car? Buy a Tesla.

So you're saying they completely ruined the only selling point of this car? You're also saying they added their ridiculous flex fuel system (face it the mileage on those engines are terrible), also adding weight, which would have the same effect on the electric running distance the old shape had.

Way to go you idiots. I keep hoping the american car industry will pull itself up, but things like this reafirm to me it won't.

What did you imagine to be the "only selling point"? Was it the look? Or was it the electric? The glass on the doors?

The Volt is still 100% electric for short commutes (more than I drive back and forth to work). It has the capability to burn gas to give you a longer range. Both sound like solid sell points. It has E85 "flex" capability. You can use ethanol gas, or regular (if you are opposed to E85).

I guess the choice of criticism would be "short range electric only", or "adding extra weight to allow extended driving over the rated 40 miles". Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

What did you imagine to be the "only selling point"? Was it the look? Or was it the electric? The glass on the doors?

The Volt is still 100% electric for short commutes (more than I drive back and forth to work). It has the capability to burn gas to give you a longer range. Both sound like solid sell points. It has E85 "flex" capability. You can use ethanol gas, or regular (if you are opposed to E85).

I guess the choice of criticism would be "short range electric only", or "adding extra weight to allow extended driving over the rated 40 miles". Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

The look was the only real selling point to the volt. The flex fuel engines are VERY inefficient for both ethanol gas and regular gas. Why not just stick in a regular gas engine? It'll get better mileage than the flex. Not to mention the fact the engine seals aren't holding up very well for people who switch between ethanol and regular gas...

Ahh, Chevy, while Honda preps its next generation Civic, they're still copying the current gen. :p

What? The current gen Civic Hybrid is 100% electric (for about 40 miles) with the gas engine only there to recharge the battery?

Did not know that.... :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!