Thanks Chevy for the Volt...


Recommended Posts

Do you not realize that the concept Volt was created without the aerodynamics of the body as a consideration in the design? The concept was as aerodynamic as a brick and when your trying to get 40 miles on pure electric you can't have that. If you honestly believed that the final version would look like the concept then you have only yourself to blame because very rarely does a production car look like its original concept stage design where all the practical considerations aren't being factored in.

The very narrow window space in the concept car looks like a distorted caricature of a car. Thin strip of glass above a very wide (tall) body.

The doors had to be modified to be transparent at the top to compensate for what I imagine would otherwise be an obstruction to vision. Clear plastic? Scratches and fog/hazing from UV exposure. Glass? No way. Expensive, certainly.

While the concept looks more aggressive with its squarer front fascia, the more flowing rounded production model is likely more aerodynamic and gets rid of the problematic transparent door sections.

Less of a "WTF?" moment than a more practical build.

Dude you do realize that the appeal of the Volt was probably the styling alone. Now that it's become a Chevy-esque Civic this thread might as well be merged with the "ugliest car" thread.

chevrolet-camaro-concept-5433.jpg

Camero concept is pretty much par with the production. Another thing though, they completely restyled the Volt, took some elements on the concept and slabbed it on an ordinary frame.

Just my opinion anyways.

That's major changes from the Concept.

Still isn't bad looking, just doesn't look as much like a sports car as it once upon a time did. Looks like they decided to go more family oriented than two person sports car.

If you look closely at the concept, it's not a 2 person sports car, it's a 4 door sedan.

Better picture of the concept car: Chevrolet-Volt-DC.jpg

Well I always knew that those glass doors or whatever that is never had a chance of being in the production car.

Apparently sundayx didn't. :p The styling needed to be much more aerodynamic to get the range that people would want demand, too.

The concept Volt now looks like a Malibu Volt production car.... So I would say it's a drastic change.

But everybody was in love with the concept car, even pledging to buy one when it's out (both for look and economic reasons). But now, with the final look, I wonder if it will sell as much. It's going to be a $40K Malibu....

I agree that the concept's look was nice and aggressive, but at a larger expense and with reduced mileage per charge due to poorer aerodynamics.

And cost and traveling distance are more important than "uber cool" looks, imo.

I agree that the concept's look was nice and aggressive, but at a larger expense and with reduced mileage per charge due to poorer aerodynamics.

And cost and traveling distance are more important than "uber cool" looks, imo.

It depends on how much money you have and your amount of concern for the environment. Look at most of the celebrities out there, driving their ub3r c00l hummer limos that get 1 mpg just because they can.

Plus, I like the new design, more than the brick-ish concept. The concept certainly looks "futuristic", but that's on purpose to get people hyped about it.

If you look closely at the concept, it's not a 2 person sports car, it's a 4 door sedan.

<snipped>

The original design was only two doors, I hadn't seen the actual concept car, so my apologies :)

The reasons for the change: "The Volt ... had to be redesigned from the ground up to accommodate the hybrid gasoline-electric propulsion system, as well as for aerodynamic reasons, pedestrian safety and other concerns, GM President Rick Wagoner said as the Volt made its much-anticipated debut."

I suspect they heard a lot of complaints about it only getting 40 miles to the single charge, so they added in a flex fuel system which would allow it to act a standard hybrid vehicle after the 40 miles are up. This is an incredible decision because it actually makes this car more practical.

Apparently sundayx didn't. :p The styling needed to be much more aerodynamic to get the range that people would want demand, too.

I did. I know the difference between a concept and a production model, and as everyone know, there are many things in concepts that do not go into production. The moulded glass is not my concern, nor the slit windows that does not give any visibility.

I just want to say is, by giving us an absolutely stunning EV concept that supposedly revolutionizes the auto-industry, then giving us a production model that is of no promise, I'm just deeply heart-broken. You know the brick like form is not an aerodynamic concern, they could at least followed a justifyable form from the concept. The Camaro is boxy, the Mustang is boxy, but the fact is they are beautiful and offer good performance.

Anyways simply put, IMO the concept is beautiful and the production Volt is fubar.

The Camaro is boxy, the Mustang is boxy, but the fact is they are beautiful and offer good performance.

The Camaro and the Mustang are not concerned with fuel or energy efficiency either. Part of what makes a hybrid car efficient is that they are (usually) very aerodynamic as well. Want an electric sports car? Buy a Tesla.

So you're saying they completely ruined the only selling point of this car? You're also saying they added their ridiculous flex fuel system (face it the mileage on those engines are terrible), also adding weight, which would have the same effect on the electric running distance the old shape had.

Way to go you idiots. I keep hoping the american car industry will pull itself up, but things like this reafirm to me it won't.

What did you imagine to be the "only selling point"? Was it the look? Or was it the electric? The glass on the doors?

The Volt is still 100% electric for short commutes (more than I drive back and forth to work). It has the capability to burn gas to give you a longer range. Both sound like solid sell points. It has E85 "flex" capability. You can use ethanol gas, or regular (if you are opposed to E85).

I guess the choice of criticism would be "short range electric only", or "adding extra weight to allow extended driving over the rated 40 miles". Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

What did you imagine to be the "only selling point"? Was it the look? Or was it the electric? The glass on the doors?

The Volt is still 100% electric for short commutes (more than I drive back and forth to work). It has the capability to burn gas to give you a longer range. Both sound like solid sell points. It has E85 "flex" capability. You can use ethanol gas, or regular (if you are opposed to E85).

I guess the choice of criticism would be "short range electric only", or "adding extra weight to allow extended driving over the rated 40 miles". Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

The look was the only real selling point to the volt. The flex fuel engines are VERY inefficient for both ethanol gas and regular gas. Why not just stick in a regular gas engine? It'll get better mileage than the flex. Not to mention the fact the engine seals aren't holding up very well for people who switch between ethanol and regular gas...

Ahh, Chevy, while Honda preps its next generation Civic, they're still copying the current gen. :p

What? The current gen Civic Hybrid is 100% electric (for about 40 miles) with the gas engine only there to recharge the battery?

Did not know that.... :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AnyDesk 9.7.6 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just 7 megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.7.6 changelog: Fixed Bugs Added validation feedback for passwords shorter than five characters Fixed an issue in AnyDesk One Meeting where the account name was used instead of the entered username after logging out Fixed crashes related to message editing and context menu interactions Fixed issues affecting message scrolling, text formatting, typing indicators, quoted messages, and community privacy settings Prevented users from editing automated system messages Corrected download status reporting, temporary file naming, and menu overlap issues affecting the Download History and Reactions pop-ups Other Changes Added chat list grouping settings Added keyboard navigation support (Page Up, Page Down, Home, and End) for the message feed Removed Chat language options Updated translations Download: AnyDesk 9.7.6 | 8.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • It's interesting to hear that AI growth is not investor driven.
    • A few weeks ago, I had this same exact issue. Unfortunately, I didn't think of disabling the Secure Boot option in BIOS. I updated my BIOS to the latest version for my MB and it resolved the issue.
    • I have a partial answer, when I used a multi-port usb hub I had degraded speed performance with 3 large external hard drives connected. I managed to snag a nice (yet older) USB3 based wavelink docking station cheap / used that has x6 usb 3 ports and almost doubled the speed of the external hard drives transfer rate. This looks to be a slightly upgraded model -https://ebay.io/m/LZtjTy
    • Microsoft faces shareholder lawsuit over masking AI costs and slowing Azure growth by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft is facing a class action lawsuit from shareholders who allege that the company intentionally overhyped its artificial intelligence initiatives to distract from slowing cloud revenue and an exploding infrastructure bill. The complaint was filed in a Seattle federal court by the Michigan-based City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System. The plaintiffs argue that Microsoft’s leadership painted an overly optimistic picture of its Copilot rollout and complex OpenAI partnership. They say that the company did this while downplaying the harsh reality that building the data centers required to power these next-generation tools requires a huge amount of capital. Back at the company's Q2 2026 earnings report from late January, Microsoft revealed that its flagship Azure cloud growth had slipped to 39% (down from 40% the prior quarter) and guided investors to expect a further deceleration to 37% or 38% for the first three months of 2026. Now, under normal circumstances, a slight percentage point drop in cloud growth is a minor operational hiccup. But the Redmond giant paired that guidance with $37.5 billion in quarterly capital expenditures. This figure, which is a 66% year-over-year surge, blew past any analyst estimates at that time. Much of this amount went into buying high-priced GPUs and custom silicon that were required to train and run large language models. This is why the market reacted violently and just a day after its earnings call on January 29, the company's stock plummeted 10%, and wiped out $357 billion of capital in just a trading session. Microsoft is doing better now, though. Its Q3 2026 results showed its run rate from its AI business was hitting $37 billion, proving that enterprise demand for its infrastructure is very real and continuing to scale. Microsoft isn't the only company pouring billions into infrastructure for the AI boom. We've seen most Big Tech companies, including Amazon and Google, also get the results of these investments with stronger-than-ever growth and increased income. via Reuters
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      201
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!