Third Parties Are Ditching the PSP


Recommended Posts

Definitely. A very close call.

Yeah...:unsure:

I guess every PS2 owner is a queer then because of barbie's horse adventure. Better go break the news to 120+ million people!

Gotta love the maturity level on Neowin sometimes (N)

Gotta love the lack of sense of humour as well :yes:

Coldgunner, where have you been dude :p

I think you need to learn a thing or two about DS Homebrew though, everything you just listed I can do on the DS :yes: Well, except ISO's, .NDS ftw baby ;)

It's far better on the PSP though.

I'd never ditch PSP emulation/homebrew to go to DS. Emulators don't run full speed, the same amount of emulators can't be used (some require more powerful hardware, PS1 for start obviously) and widescreen for films/tv shows is superior.

DS does have a lot of homebrew but, it's just hardware power goes a long way in the world of homebrew to equal results.

Yeah if we are talking about film quality and emulator speed, the PSP is better. That could change though if the rumours are to be believed the DS is upgrading later this year (wider screens and a second touch screen etc).

My point is, you can still do all the same stuff. Did you ditch your dvd's when you got your blu-ray player? (PS3 obv) ;)

Yeah if we are talking about film quality and emulator speed, the PSP is better. That could change though if the rumours are to be believed the DS is upgrading later this year (wider screens and a second touch screen etc).

My point is, you can still do all the same stuff. Did you ditch your dvd's when you got your blu-ray player? (PS3 obv) ;)

DS emulators will get better, but things will never change substantially. It's not powerhouse hardware, which it doesn't need to be for the DS side of things, but in homebrew/emulation power is they key.

You won't be able to play PS1/N64 games or The Curse of Monkey Island on the DS :p SNES/Genesis and the likes play, but are nowhere near the PSP 95% compatibility/full speed.

No I didn't ditch my DVDs, but I buy what I can buy in HD now.

Both offer the same film, but I prefer the superior quality.

DS emulators will get better, but things will never change substantially. It's not powerhouse hardware, which it doesn't need to be for the DS side of things, but in homebrew/emulation power is they key.

You won't be able to play PS1/N64 games or The Curse of Monkey Island on the DS :p SNES/Genesis and the likes play, but are nowhere near the PSP 95% compatibility/full speed.

No I didn't ditch my DVDs, but I buy what I can buy in HD now.

Both offer the same film, but I prefer the superior quality.

Dude, it's 2008 not 1998, wtf :laugh:

I kid I kid

Coldgunner, where have you been dude :p

I think you need to learn a thing or two about DS Homebrew though, everything you just listed I can do on the DS :yes: Well, except ISO's, .NDS ftw baby ;)

If you're talking about a vanilla PSP, you can only load one game at a time. A vanilla DS you can load two :p

My DS homebrew was limited to the GBA movie player. The PSP has more power under the hood and it really shows when playing higher bitrate video and emulation. PSP is just far more suited to me, even when I used official firmware. The web browser is certainly superior, along with wireless connectivity. The whole PSP-PS3 interactivity is far more advanced than DS-Wii interoperability. Things like digital copy on BD's is going to rock too. there are other factors to take into consideration, I can share a lot of content between my PS3 and PSP, they are so well intwined.

Dude, it's 2008 not 1998, wtf :laugh:

I kid I kid

Monkey Island Series :wub:

I despise the gaming community/developers for abandoning good AAA adventure games. Give me a good load of them over another 15 FPS games trying to cash in due to the popularity of the FPS kings.

The likes of Grim Fandango and everything else :(

My DS homebrew was limited to the GBA movie player. The PSP has more power under the hood and it really shows when playing higher bitrate video and emulation. PSP is just far more suited to me, even when I used official firmware. The web browser is certainly superior, along with wireless connectivity. The whole PSP-PS3 interactivity is far more advanced than DS-Wii interoperability. Things like digital copy on BD's is going to rock too. there are other factors to take into consideration, I can share a lot of content between my PS3 and PSP, they are so well intwined.

I know, I agree :p I just said they are both capable of doing that stuff (minus the PS3 > PSP interactivity)

I disagree on the web browser though (Opera fanboy :p)

I don't like the PSP browser that much, it's okay and wide-screen read support makes it usable.

Seems like we're getting an update to the browser though which is good - https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=675062

Polish as in better quality games or more games?

Both have bleak lineups quantity wise, although at least you know developers are falling head over heels to make stuff for the Wii, as hundreds of Wii owners buy anything.

With hundreds of crap flying at you (Wii), the sheer number of developers making games usually = a good game being churned out eventually.

Polish means better overall quality of course. The first batch of games was partially mediocre, even Mario Party (a Nintendo Game) was unusually bad.

Even though the crapware still finds a way in, I'm starting to see a little devotion from the developers part. Even EA and Konami are doing a great job at it imo.

Sony Online Entertainment president John Smedley has revealed that the company is considering massively multiplayer online games for the PSP.

?I think PSP is something that we?re definitely looking at; 34 million [sold] worldwide really opens your eyes, and they?re all connected,? Smedley told me in an interview following his keynote and panel appearance about the future of MMOGs at the New York Games Conference on Friday.

?We started to get very interested in [the PSP] when we switched over from Sony Pictures to Sony Computer Entertainment back in April,? he explained. ?And as we?ve kind of got our heads up looking around the world within Sony Computer Entertainment, we?re really starting to see a big push for PSP. We think it?s a world-class device? In the future, we see full MMOs that are designed for the PSP.?

However, before full-fledged MMOs, Smedley sees integration of existing online games with the handheld device, though the company hasn?t finalized any decisions. ?Maybe one way to do it: In ?Free Realms,? you could have a pet-training system that literally connects to our online gaming where you can mess around with your pet,? he said of SOE?s younger-skewing MMO due out next year.

?Another way to do it might be to give them mini-games that they can do [on the PSP] when sitting at a bus stop,? he offered. ?You?re sitting there leveling up your character, you log in at home when you?re on wi-fi, and all of sudden your character has leveled up. We think those kinds of experiences are very possible.?

My opinion is that it?s not a sustainable format for the handheld as anyone wishing to play a MMO would have already done so on a far larger screen using their PC, giving them better controls and visuals to boot. Still, it wouldn?t be the first time that some muppet has paid for a technically inferior product for a handheld?look at The Sims franchise for example.

Good stuff.

The thing is, MMO doesn't mean MMORPG. You could technically have an MMOAA (action adventure) or an MMOFPS, hell, you could even have an MMO Pet Sim if you really wanted. I don't get this mindset of "Well MMOs are better on big screen PCs", because, what seperates an MMO from a regular game? What's that? Just an internet connection? The same connection the PSP already has? The PSP proves console gaming in your hand is awesome, and even online gaming in your hand is awesome (DS proved these points too), so eventually moving to massively multiplayer online games is a natural evolution. The only reason why it's not a sustainable format is simply because the PSP will eventually go, and there's no surefire way of knowing whether the PSP 2 will play PSP games, not because the PC is amazing or whatever.

It really annoys me when people think the PC is be all and end all for MMOs (likewise for people who think MMOs are always MMORPGs). It's an archaic mindset that needs to be ditched asap.

The general mindset of saying an "MMO on a portable device" will get some stereotyping, naturally :/

But of course, we're not talking about WoW on a PSP :p

However I'm all for it, if you don't try new things, you'll never find out what could have been.

I'm happy to see Sony trying to steam ahead with MMOs on consoles as well.

Especially seeing as The Agency at least is free to play. I can't fathom a world of every MMO charging monthly money, as I certainly won't be paying for them.

That's not third party though..

If Sony got some good titles up and running then other developers would catch interest and imitate.

The publisher in this case, Sony, can afford to take a bigger risk here, than say a 3rd party dev coming in and trying an MMO.

Putting the concept of an MMO on a portable device is pretty unexplored ground. It could go ###### up.

I'm sure though if Capcom want to create a Monster Hunter MMO, Japan will go nuts :p

I think a decent part of getting devs back on board is down to Sony to convince them the PSP can do something that differentiates itself from the DS, or something the DS will struggle to do - Like the DS can do things the PSP can't really copy that are working well.

Maybe that's getting the PSN store on the PSP, as well as an integrated PSN friends list and churning out some MMO/Multiplayer titles, who knows? Worth a gamble though I think.

Nintendo are skimping the online side of things pretty badly this generation (ridiculous friend codes, lackluster network support, ect), that may just be the weak spot Sony, and even MS can attack to steal audiences on consoles and portables.

Edited by Audioboxer
...

This is exactly why the PSP is dying imo, they're pushing the wrong games.

Another way to do it might be to give them mini-games that they can do [on the PSP] when sitting at a bus stop,? he offered. ?You?re sitting there leveling up your character, you log in at home when you?re on wi-fi, and all of sudden your character has leveled up.

Oh really, that's an MMO? It seems more like "play offline and sync your profile". MMO's haven't even taken off when it comes to consoles, let alone a portable one that doesn't even have a persistent Internet connection.

They should really focus on the portable experience and how they could create games based on that, not the other way around.

@ Shadow, I wasn't talking directly to you, I was commenting on the article.

@ AB, if and might are the big key words there. How long has the PSP been out now, and it's still not taken off with 3rd party devs? Yeah, even if this MMO comes into existance, it's not gonna do anything for it this late on. The PSP is too far on in it's life now to really change things around. They'd be better asking for more support when the PSP2 comes out and working towards making that a success imo.

@ Shadow, I wasn't talking directly to you, I was commenting on the article.

@ AB, if and might are the big key words there. How long has the PSP been out now, and it's still not taken off with 3rd party devs? Yeah, even if this MMO comes into existance, it's not gonna do anything for it this late on. The PSP is too far on in it's life now to really change things around. They'd be better asking for more support when the PSP2 comes out and working towards making that a success imo.

I don't think the article was aimed at the 3rd party developers leaving, was it?

I don't think things are ever to late, especially not in the portable market while where there is competition, it's not really anything as fierce as the home console market.

Portable devices for a start probably all kick off selling at a profit, or at least will probably not make the losses in line with what consoles do.

It's a more relaxed market, two competitors both holding good audience bases and offering different enough experiences to justify owning both - More so than owning a 360 and PS3 IMO (both of which offer more alike than they do uniquely).

The issue Sony have isn't that the platform is dying or slowing down as such, they're just need a kick up the arse in the software department. More encouragement/support from Sony to 3rd party developers on the PSP is needed (Y)

A potential trojan will also be PS3 install base increasing which it is going to - The tie in between PSP-PS3 is far better than that of the DS-Wii. The PS3 isn't going anywhere soon, so that's a thought to keep in mind.

You get the PSN store on the PSP, coupled with a unified PSN list (not remote play, direct integration) and you bolster up the online side of things in terms of software, and that may be an area of market the DS won't be as fruitful in.

But yeah, my point is that article doesn't fit with this topic. It's got nothing to do with 3rd parties at all.

No not directly, but I think I wrote a fairly insightful comment on how Sony approaching something new on the device, can easily spark off interest from 3rd parties, those not willing to take the initial big risk.

Edited by Audioboxer
I don't think the PSP is dying at all. Sony will be more than capable of producing first party games for it.

Honestly, what does that have to do with anything?

You think Sony pumping out 3 games a year is going to save it? They need good 3rd party support, they need creativity and most of all they need to focus the PSP as a gaming platform 'cause it still suffers from the same identity crisis the PS3 had/has.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This is about the already discredited 2025 announcement. Not the current one, which I've heard nothing negative about in the academic literature.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!