AAPL Stocks and What's wrong with them


Recommended Posts

Hey,

First of all, I'm not really that much into economics so I have a wrong basis for this subject... A thing that caught my attention lately is the AAPL stocks... I never really understood how it can go up or down.

Since last month, it lost like 50 dollars, starting at about 180 and dropping at about 130, but nothing catastrophic happened, hell they even updated 2 iPod lines!

My 100 bucks question is : Which factors will influence a company's stocks?

I know if there are bad news or something about a company, it'll obviously go down a lot, but even after an event like Macworld or WWDC, sometimes their stock is going down, when they are actually bringing good news about their future and present and bringing new stuff on the market.

Apparently, if they invest too much money into research and development, their stocks will go down, so this would be my explanation for these specific Apple Events where it's actually going down.

Also, stocks are updated like every 10 minutes. How is that even possible? Is there a person who's watching AAPL news all the time and setting something in the background? I mean, it's not up to Apple to give a value to their stocks, sure they can do something about it, but there's also an exterior source or something that can change it. If it changed like once a day I could understand, but every couple of minutes, I'm lost...

I'm pretty sure my questions sound stupid and everything, but I believe the answers would be rather complex in this case... especially because I have no economics knowledge (I'm in the science domain, so money is not my thing... except for the big salary :) ).

All i can say is, if everyone knows that stocks will rise at Macworld or WWDC then everyone would put their money in and take it out straight after. Trends are next to impossible to spot on stocks and shares, but from time to time you can find them, thats the hard part.

Have you seen the US economy recently? It hasn't been doing to good. That could be a possible reason as to why Apple's stock has been going up and down

As for your question about how the stocks are updated - if I remember correctly from my high school econ class, it's due to the fact that it's constantly being traded in varying amounts, which causes the price to fluctuate.

Yea. Apple's really not to blame here. The US's economy is in the freakin' tank.

It isn't? Have you seen all the problems they've had with products recently?

You can take the Safari blunder to start with, then there was MobileMe (both forcing users to install it and the start up issues). Then there's also the iPhone App Store issues and the new NDA. There's also the security blunder with the iPhone that allows users to make a call with the phone locked, or to bypass the security entirely (in a previous version).

Apple has had a nice long list of 2008 blunders. Apple is partly the cause of their stock going down.

My 100 bucks question is : Which factors will influence a company's stocks?

The value of a stock is equal to the price people are willing to buy or sell them for. What a person willing to pay is almost exclusively determined by what personal profit they'll be able to make will be.

How do you make profit from stock:

1) dividends

2) selling them

If I think that my yearly dividends for owning a given stock will make me more money than just tossing the money in the bank, I might buy that stock. If I think that when I sell a given stock it'll be worth more than I paid for it, I might buy it.

Figuring out whether or not a company is going to make money is the magic that makes some investors very wealthy and there isn't an exact science to it. Apple makes luxary goods: so in a weak economy they're probably not a good short-term investment (however buying Apple stock at $100 might be a good idea if you think that 8 years from now things will be better and Apple will be as profitable as Walmart is today).

I know if there are bad news or something about a company, it'll obviously go down a lot, but even after an event like Macworld or WWDC, sometimes their stock is going down, when they are actually bringing good news about their future and present and bringing new stuff on the market.

If I buy stock 3 months before Macworld at say $50 / share, and the day of macworld the stock is worth $100 I'm going to dump it: I've doubled my money, I'll take my profit and call it a day -- the practice is called 'profit taking'. The only reason I wouldn't take profit is because I think that there's a higher short-term point for the stock that's worth waiting for. Even if the long term trend is upward, there will still be spikes up and down, and I can make money buy buying and selling on those.

After the announcement I can evaluate what I think Apple's future position will be and either re-invest -- possibly picking up a few more shares because the price will be slightly depressed by profit taking -- or place my money elsewhere (ie: defense contractors, gold, or real-estate if I think the economy will continue to suck)

Apparently, if they invest too much money into research and development, their stocks will go down, so this would be my explanation for these specific Apple Events where it's actually going down.

R&D without pay-off is debt. If I think Apple is squandering money and that some other company will be a better gamble then I'll sell and buy them instead. Apple's R&D budget is fairly modest in comparison to their profit ($450 million / year or so, IIRC), and the results of their efforts have generally been good for their profits. For me the major considerations are:

Good things:

  • Mac OS X has been generally well recieved and it's been driving the sales of new macs at a steady pace.
  • iPod remains the industry leader and while growth is slowing, it doesn't look like any 3rd party is going to be stealing the market from Apple
  • iPhone is has surpassed my expectations so far as sales and what is possible for a protable phone
  • iTunes store: largest music retailer ever. That's an impressive accomplishment (though it isn't a huge profit center) and I think they'll be able to leverage that in the future.

bad things:

  • Steve's not looking so good, there's no suitable replacement readily apparent. He's an important part of the companies success and I think his departure will noticeably impact stock price.
  • Stock options nonsense
  • Apple TV is generally a dud
  • Lawsuits with the clone makers may shake-up their business model
  • They're a luxury goods maker in a weak economy

Also, stocks are updated like every 10 minutes. How is that even possible? Is there a person who's watching AAPL news all the time and setting something in the background? I mean, it's not up to Apple to give a value to their stocks, sure they can do something about it, but there's also an exterior source or something that can change it. If it changed like once a day I could understand, but every couple of minutes, I'm lost...

There are millions of people buying and selling stocks every day. Every time someone says "I'll pay $x for y amount" and someone else says "okay" the value changes. The legal options for apple to directly influence stock prices are fairly limited: the most obvious one is to offer a buy back: "Well pay $x to buy up our own shares". If the buy back is sufficiently large then the average price will tend to rise toward that amount. They can also reduce the value of their shares increasing the number. if Apple is "worth" $10 and there are 10 shares then the value of the shares are $1 each: Apple could increase that number by issuing a stock split (we will double the number of shares you have). $10 apple / 20 shares makes each share worth $0.50. They can also 'create' new shares and sell them.

The numbers you see on the TV are typically:

1) The average transaction price over a period of time (typically the day)

2) the change in that average (typically from the final average from yesterday)

3) the number of transactions occurring (more trades than normal tells you share holders think a significant change in share price is likely)

It isn't? Have you seen all the problems they've had with products recently?

They've also been growing and ridiculously profitable for over a decade.

A company could make it's money by crapping in the mouths of their customers. If they were making hundreds of millions in profit every quarter, and they were selling 20% more mouth-pooping accounts this year than last then they'd be a damn good investment.

About your specific reasons:

  • I don't think The Safari blunder (I don't know what you're talking about here) is going to effect Apple's long term profitability because I don't know what you're talking about: and if a nerd that makes his living writing code on a mac doesn't then the impact is insignficant.
  • The crappy MobileMe launch is a short term hit, but not significant in terms of their total profit. It's impact on share price will be negligible in my mind. A few months of free service for a relatively small part of their business: it sucks, but not enough to make me think they'll still be paying for it in 2 years.
  • The iPhone unlocking situation doesn't bother me at all because for generation 1 phones apple is paid their AT&T kick-back for sales, not contracts (if anything, I think that sold more phones than not -- It'd be a net positive to share price). The current list of iPhone problems (dropped calls, etc) are something I'm watching because a recall or mass warrenty program like the xbox could impact earnings. At the moment Apple is selling second generation iPhones hand over fist with no signs of slowing: it's a profitable business.
  • App store: The costs to run are negliable and it's 30% 'free money' for work done by 3rd parties. I think the iPhone was a profitable product without the App store and so it's crap quality and the bull**** they're hitting developers with isn't likely to impact the short term stock price. Nobody but super-nerds know that iPhone development is burdened by rediculous NDAs and that the store is?in simple terms: a huge pile of crap. Until my mother complains about the App store I'm treating this like a "might not establish a dominenent market position" issue. For people that think that the iPhone is the next iPod and that want to double or tripple their money: that's a big deal. I'm in this for small gains and a crappy app store isn't getting in the way of that for the moment.

As an investor, I don't really care what customers think about the company unless that attitude is likely to impact their profitability. I'm confident that Apple's next two quarters will be good and that their long-term position (2 years) is strong so I tossed a few grand at buying up their shares.

As a consumer: Apple's performance is sketchy and Im' really annoyed by a number of things. I recognize that I'm an atypical consumer though (ie: I know what difference between CDMA and GSM are), so while I'm likely to spot the causes of long-term troubles quicker than somebody like my mom, I'm careful not to over-react. If my mom starts talking about how bad her new iPhone is (or trades it for a blackberry) I'll start to examine my choices. If anybody in my office says "I'm buying a Dell because Safari/Mac OS X are too risky" I'll probably dump my stock that day.

If anything Apple stocks are healthy in comparison with the rest of the market. Everyone's shares are down, Apple proves to be no exception. It may be time to start investing in Apple while stocks are low, but with the unpredictable behaviour of the market at the moment, it is still a significant risk.

The US economy is doing horrible and thats one of the reasons why not just Apple, every company is losing share prices and etc. Apple closed at $105/per share yesterday and it's at $113.66/per share right now.

I personally think its a good time to buy AAPL stocks, and am actually considering doing it. But the prices today are more reflective of the actual value of what they should be. I don't think that Apple's stock is worth $180/per share it was going for just over a month ago.

i honestly would pull out of apple and invest in alternative fuel companies because they are the future. without energy there is no apple, products, etc...

just like the cell phone business back in the late 80's. imagine how much money you could have now if you bought motorola stock for $3 a share.

i honestly would pull out of apple and invest in alternative fuel companies because they are the future. without energy there is no apple, products, etc...

Alternative fuels aren't profitable right now. Dumping a proven stock in a profitable company that has a target price of $180+ from numerous financial analysts to invest in some nebulous 'alternative fuel' company (who? BP? Shell? Exxon? The major oil companies spend more on alternative fuel R&D than damn near all "alternative fuel" companies combined)'

How exactly is this going to get me closer to retirement?

Why not invest in Monsanto? Without food we all die and they've been performing incredibly well over the last 5 years.

Why not invest in Exxon mobile? Without oil there's no plastics to make the electric cars and ipods AND we have a world-wide infrastrucutre build around burning oil for power. They've got a few years left, and their last 10 years have been pretty amazing.

For most of us, we buy stock to make money. While it's nice to support a pet cause or two most of us aren't willing to ignore things like "profitability" when planning our financial future.

just like the cell phone business back in the late 80's. imagine how much money you could have now if you bought motorola stock for $3 a share.

1987: $5.70/share. Since then there have been a pair of 2:1 splits, and one 3:1 split. You'd have 12 shares for everyone 1 you purchased, today's closing price was $5.70. You'd also have 80 quarterly dividends of roughly 2 cents over term ($1.60). That's roughly $82 per share profit.

Apple over the same time frame: $10.17/share. $0.72 (24 dividends of $0.03/share), and a pair of 2:1 splits. Closing price of $113. Total profit: $440 per share.

Walmart over the same time frame: $10.70/share. $9.60 (80 dividends averaging $0.12/share) and a 2:1 split. Closing price of $53.

Total profit: $113 per share.

Motorola has underperformed the NASDAQ for quiet some time and going back as far as 1970 it'd still be a bad investment compared to any of the current tech leaders (apple, microsoft, etc). Nokia would have been a better example, but they didn't get listed until '96

Likewise you could have just as easily bought Palm in 2001 and lost a fortune. From 1 share at $800 to 40 shares worth about $6.

The value of a stock is equal to the price people are willing to buy or sell them for. What a person willing to pay is almost exclusively determined by what personal profit they'll be able to make will be.

How do you make profit from stock:

1) dividends

2) selling them

Not necessarily. Stock is determined by the overall value of the company. If the company does good in accomplishing its goals, its stock goes up. Stock, however, is started by the investments of the people; who are then respectively owners of the company once they purchase shares.

Apple's stock is going down because of the problems they are having. Problems=less cash flow. Less cash flow=reduced stock value. Shares remain the same until shareholders withdraw their investments in the company; which I doubt anyone will do now since they will probably lose money.

Why not invest in Monsanto? Without food we all die and they've been performing incredibly well over the last 5 years.

Monsanto is slowly killing us all by tempting fate and continuing to use genetically modified products in most of their ventures. Thanks to Monsanto almost every human in a civilized nation has been exposed to genetically modified products due to monsanto using it in their refined items such as HFCS (High Fructose Corn Syrup)

I could go on and on about how Monsanto completely screws the average American farmer. Did you know that when you plant Monsanto seeds you don't own the seeds and you are not allowed to keep them? You only bought the "genetic pattern" for that year, and any remaining stock must be destroyed. Whats that? Some seeds blew onto your neighbors farm and he is a competitor of yours? Just call Monsanto, their lawyers will quickly shut down your neighbors farm for illegally growing their LICENSED genetic pattern even though the wind is the one that planted the seeds...

I'm not some crackpot who thinks genetically modified food is going to mutate us all, but I am smart enough to know that multiple trials have shown effects in animals and no long term studies have been done as to the effect of Monsanto's genetically modified products. Add in the fact that tests have shown frequently that GM food intended for animals is instead being diverted to the consumer market where that specific modification has not been tested as to what effects it may have on a human....well its playing with fire on a unimaginable scale.

/Rant

It's just adjusting itself. Stocks get overvalued on desirability, something like new products come out and the stocks seem worth more than they are. The market prices go up, but eventually they all go back down to where they are actually valued. This is the same with prices going up after they are unnaturally low, they will drop below the actual value line, and then adjust themselves. This is how a lot of people make long-term money in the market.

Apples stocks were simply over hyped and shot up over their actual value (this is based on many factors and calculated many different ways), now they are just adjusting back. They will probably shoot back up again. Of course, this isn't the case with all stocks and companies, but I believe it accurately reflects Apple's case.

Monsanto is slowly killing us all by tempting fate and continuing to use genetically modified products in most of their ventures. Thanks to Monsanto almost every human in a civilized nation has been exposed to genetically modified products due to monsanto using it in their refined items such as HFCS (High Fructose Corn Syrup)

I could go on and on about how Monsanto completely screws the average American farmer. Did you know that when you plant Monsanto seeds you don't own the seeds and you are not allowed to keep them? You only bought the "genetic pattern" for that year, and any remaining stock must be destroyed. Whats that? Some seeds blew onto your neighbors farm and he is a competitor of yours? Just call Monsanto, their lawyers will quickly shut down your neighbors farm for illegally growing their LICENSED genetic pattern even though the wind is the one that planted the seeds...

I'm not some crackpot who thinks genetically modified food is going to mutate us all, but I am smart enough to know that multiple trials have shown effects in animals and no long term studies have been done as to the effect of Monsanto's genetically modified products. Add in the fact that tests have shown frequently that GM food intended for animals is instead being diverted to the consumer market where that specific modification has not been tested as to what effects it may have on a human....well its playing with fire on a unimaginable scale.

/Rant

Don't believe everything you read without doing the requisite research. My parents (and myself, for a time) are farmers, so I have first-hand experience with Monsanto. None of what you said above is true, especially your middle paragraph. That's just absurd. The biggest concern about genetically modified seed is some companies and countries are paying less for the seed, and in some circumstances not accepting them at all. All because of the made-up junk you posted above.

Not necessarily. Stock is determined by the overall value of the company. If the company does good in accomplishing its goals, its stock goes up. Stock, however, is started by the investments of the people; who are then respectively owners of the company once they purchase shares.

The overall value has little to do with the stock price. While the end of quarter estimates do impact the stock, they don't make or break it.

Apple's stock is going down because of the problems they are having. Problems=less cash flow. Less cash flow=reduced stock value. Shares remain the same until shareholders withdraw their investments in the company; which I doubt anyone will do now since they will probably lose money.

No it isn't. None of Apple's "gaffes" have really impacted the stock. Nothing compared to the House voting down the bailout plan or the general state of the economy. They are making money hand over foot yet the stock is still dropping. Google's is stock, while higher, has also dropped a considerable amount.

Don't believe everything you read without doing the requisite research. My parents (and myself, for a time) are farmers, so I have first-hand experience with Monsanto. None of what you said above is true, especially your middle paragraph. That's just absurd. The biggest concern about genetically modified seed is some companies and countries are paying less for the seed, and in some circumstances not accepting them at all. All because of the made-up junk you posted above.

Actually, there have been court cases where Monsanto has sued people for that very reason. It was big news a few years ago. Here is one example taken from the Associated Press:

http://www.biotech-info.net/monsanto_drops.html

Schmeiser said he planted his 1997 crop with seed saved from 1996, and insists that any Roundup Ready growing on his land was spread by wind or by grain trucks travelling on roads adjacent to his fields.

In the statement of claim, Schmeiser says Monsanto has libeled him by publicly accusing him of committing illegal acts, trespassing on his land in order to obtain seed samples and improperly obtaining samples of his seed from a local seed plant.

Here's a Canadian example: http://www.percyschmeiser.com/conflict.htm

Not necessarily. Stock is determined by the overall value of the company. If the company does good in accomplishing its goals, its stock goes up. Stock, however, is started by the investments of the people; who are then respectively owners of the company once they purchase shares.

Apple's stock is going down because of the problems they are having. Problems=less cash flow. Less cash flow=reduced stock value. Shares remain the same until shareholders withdraw their investments in the company; which I doubt anyone will do now since they will probably lose money.

Stock price is based on speculation. It has little to do with actual earnings and "accomplishing its goals." Apple stock is going down because their outlook began slipping, based on speculation from "analysts." It has nothing to do with current "problems."

Stock price is based on speculation. It has little to do with actual earnings and "accomplishing its goals." Apple stock is going down because their outlook began slipping, based on speculation from "analysts." It has nothing to do with current "problems."

That outlook will continue to slip due to the current "problems". It has everything to do with it. No company is isolated from the effects. It was, however, a good day to purchase soup.

Not necessarily. Stock is determined by the overall value of the company. If the company does good in accomplishing its goals, its stock goes up.

No, it doesn't. By any reasonable measure Morgan Stanley was accomplishing their goals (strong earnings announced in the second week of Sept.) and a few hours later their stock dropped hard and within a week it was worth 25% of what it was. If people don't think your stock is going to make them money, they're not going to buy it. It's that simple. People see financial stocks as bad investments right now: the general feeling is that owning those companies puts you at extreme risk without an the chance for a proportional return.

Luxury goods companies are also risky investments during a recession/depression.

Apple's stock is going down because of the problems they are having. Problems=less cash flow. Less cash flow=reduced stock value.

Source? According to apples Q3 filings they've had the best third quarter in the companies history. Growth is above industry average, and they are rediculously profitable given their position in the market (~8% market-share with ~35% profit-share). Products are sitting in the channel for the same amount of time as they have for years, and they have no outstanding debt.

They have more money in the bank, more revenue, more physical assets, and have experienced strong growth for well over a decade. They're market leaders in some of the fields they compete in, and they have disproportionately high mind-share in the ones the markets that they don't lead.

What cash-flow problems are you talking about?

Shares remain the same until shareholders withdraw their investments in the company; which I doubt anyone will do now since they will probably lose money.

I'd make enough to buy a new motorcycle if I sold now, I'm not selling because I still think that $180 target is reasonable.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!