Installing Solaris Express (B98)


Recommended Posts

Do we have any Solaris Express experts in house at Neowin?

I downloaded the most recent release of Solaris Express (snv_98) on DVD .iso using Sun's download manager to ensure checksum of final download, burned the disc with Brasero in Ubuntu, and tossed it in the tray of a recently refurbished tower. The first time I booted the disk, it worked just fine and I was able to get into the GUI installation and got to around 80% of installation but had the system suddenly reboot. I tracked that to memory timings in BIOS, and after a few hours of Memtest was satisfied everything was good, I preceeded to install Windows 2000 on the first drive (160GB IDE). I wanted to go back later and reinstall Solaris on the second drive (74GB SATA) but the disk will no longer boot far enough to reach the GUI installer. I should mention it detected both drives and all my hardware fine the first time trying this. Instead, after the DVD's grub menu, the system freezes on the portion of the kernel boot...

"

Sun Release 5.11 Version snv_98 32-bit

Copyright 1983-2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.

Use is subject to license terms.

"

Installation hangs at this point and is non-responsive. I couldn't locate any relevant info to this problem, but it was strange the disk worked the first time, and does not boot any longer.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/674860-installing-solaris-express-b98/
Share on other sites

Likely more hardware issues. If it booted to the GUI installer the first time, anything short of a selfcombusting DVD-R should have it boot into it again and again. If you get the release info output and nothing else, it's likely hanging at device detection. I think if you add parameter -v to the kernel line of the GRUB entry, it should output verbose info. If you also want/need verbose info of services, add "-m verbose" after the -v.

See where it hangs and post it here.

Also, you should consider getting the OpenSolaris ISO. It's the same as Solaris Express, minus some licensed bits no one would really miss, plus ipkg. And does ZFS boot. And is a LiveCD. Get the ISO here: http://www.genunix.org/ (latest is snv_98)

After adding "-v" to the boot option, the last line to appear before the kernel hangs is "/pci@0,0/pci1849,5239@13,3 (ehci0): Unable to take control from BIOS. Failure is ignored."

Most of the changes I made to the BIOS were for memory timings, I may have made a few changes to disabling built-in ports and devices, I'll see about enabling some of those again and see what random combination works (high quality ASRock engineering).

Solved!

"Universal Serial Bus (USB*) EHCI Specification

The Enhanced Host Controller Interface (EHCI) specification describes the register-level interface for a Host Controller for the Universal Serial Bus (USB) Revision 2.0."

Going on this information, I disabled USB 2.0 support in the BIOS and the Solaris disk booted without incident.

Edited by Budious

Nice.

Still, you should consider going with OpenSolaris distro. It's the same system, but with a network package manager. Makes upgrading less of a pain. "pkg image-update", wait a bit and wham, you've an updated ZFS clone of your current system. If you're going with it, be sure to download an updated ISO, one past build snv_89, because snv_89 came with boot changes that actually require hands-on to make the updated clone bootable.

Can the opensolaris builds if downloaded by .iso be installed over a current installation of opensolaris, or solaris express to maintain current configurations and user settings? I'll probably do a reinstall at a later point, this was my first dive into a Solaris w/ Gnome environment. I tried a Solaris 10/06 w/ CDE a few years back but never got used to to it.

On another topic, I am trying to install the Sun Studio 12 package in Solaris Express to be a compiler for the netbeans IDE. I successfully installed the package, but I need to update the $PATH variable to represent the /usr/bin/version to be identify as "Sun Studio 12" when requested. I did not find consistent recommendations on how to do this, but I assuming that the changes should be made to ~/.profile to something along the lines of:

PATH={$PATH}:/usr/bin:/usr/bin/version:/usr/ucb:.

export $PATH

From the iPhone since I dont have DSL yet in my new apartment. Details only tomorrow.

You install OpenSolaris only once and then update it from the repository. Downliading newer ISOs is just to keep a current version on disc in case of a catastrophe.

Regarding SS12, I have to check it out...

  • 9 months later...
Nice.

Still, you should consider going with OpenSolaris distro. It's the same system, but with a network package manager. Makes upgrading less of a pain. "pkg image-update", wait a bit and wham, you've an updated ZFS clone of your current system. If you're going with it, be sure to download an updated ISO, one past build snv_89, because snv_89 came with boot changes that actually require hands-on to make the updated clone bootable.

True/+1

I upgraded from an early version of OpenSolaris to the current version (in fact, from snv_89), and there's a step-by-step method in the release notes for build 111b (the current version) on a terminal-based over-the-Internet upgrade (works from snv_89 or any earlier build (in fact, from any build that lacks the graphical version of the Update Manager)).

The big news for non-SPARC users is vastly-improved graphics drivers (including new drivers for a passel of nVidia and AMD-based cards, including every AMD HD-series card up to HD4890).

Do we have any Solaris Express experts in house at Neowin?

I downloaded the most recent release of Solaris Express (snv_98) on DVD .iso using Sun's download manager to ensure checksum of final download, burned the disc with Brasero in Ubuntu, and tossed it in the tray of a recently refurbished tower. The first time I booted the disk, it worked just fine and I was able to get into the GUI installation and got to around 80% of installation but had the system suddenly reboot. I tracked that to memory timings in BIOS, and after a few hours of Memtest was satisfied everything was good, I preceeded to install Windows 2000 on the first drive (160GB IDE). I wanted to go back later and reinstall Solaris on the second drive (74GB SATA) but the disk will no longer boot far enough to reach the GUI installer. I should mention it detected both drives and all my hardware fine the first time trying this. Instead, after the DVD's grub menu, the system freezes on the portion of the kernel boot...

"

Sun Release 5.11 Version snv_98 32-bit

Copyright 1983-2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.

Use is subject to license terms.

"

Installation hangs at this point and is non-responsive. I couldn't locate any relevant info to this problem, but it was strange the disk worked the first time, and does not boot any longer.

Actually, as opposed to SE, go with OpenSolaris (much further along). The current release is snv_111b (2009-06), with a current developer's build of 117.

Hardware support has vastly improved (over build 98), especially in terms of graphics card support. (I'm entering this from build 117, connected *wirelessly* to the household LAN; wireless because the onboard Ethernet isn't supported by OpenSolaris.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
    • Anyway to download these versions without being on the Experimental builds?
    • Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!