[Rumor] High-DEF wii scheduled for 2011


Recommended Posts

2898917731_7f8f1a33ab.jpg?v=0

news source: what they play also:

Gamedev.net

Article in full:

What They Play has heard from multiple sources in the game development and publishing community that Nintendo is currently showing early presentations of its next home console hardware. Apparently set to hit the market ?by 2011? the new device is said to be the true ?next generation? Nintendo console, and far more than a simple refresh of the current hardware. Unlike previous console transitions from Nintendo, the new system will be presented as a true successor to the Wii, and is being dubbed by those that have seen the presentation as ?Wii HD.? There is no indication if this will be its eventual name, but the nature of the transition has been characterized as similar to ?the shift from Game Boy to Game Boy Advance,? where familiar, key elements were left intact while the core hardware was made more powerful. It is expected by all those that we have spoken to on the subject that the new device will retain the Wii name in part.

While our sources are reluctant to be too specific about ?Wii HD,? they have been able to divulge some (albeit predictable) generalizations. High definition visuals are assured, as is a greater emphasis on digitally distributed and backwardly compatible content, indicating that the new system will feature some form of local storage medium such as a hard drive or large flash memory solution. It has also been indicated that Nintendo?s emphasis is again on what the consumer will hold in their hands and interact with, rather than the ?console? itself.

Nintendo has proven it can be extremely successful by leveraging processor technology that is not on the bleeding edge, and be more profitable and more innovative as a result. In a 2006 interview with Business Week, Nintendo visionary Shigeru Miyamoto stated, ?The consensus [at Nintendo] was that power isn't everything for a console. Too many powerful consoles can't coexist. It's like having only ferocious dinosaurs. They might fight and hasten their own extinction.? Based on our conversations about ?Wii HD? this attitude would seem to still prevail.

But why should you believe this? Everything stated so far could easily have been the result of educated guesswork or speculation. While a Nintendo representative provided the expected response that, ?Nintendo does not comment on speculation or rumor,? there is additional evidence, outside this commentary, to suggest that something is going on.

In 2003, Nintendo declared that $34 million was spent on R&D. This figure steadily climbed to $103 million in 2006 and the following year bumped dramatically to $370 million.

Based on figures from Nintendo?s annual financial reports, the company is currently spending more than ten times as much on research and development as it was five years ago, and since the Wii was launched in 2006, R&D spending has more than tripled. While this could be attributed to any number of additional projects, the level of spending suggests that a large project is in the works. In 2003, Nintendo declared that $34 million was spent on R&D. This figure steadily climbed to $103 million in 2006 (the year that the Wii launched) and the following year bumped dramatically to $370 million. When asked to explain the escalated spending, Nintendo representatives were unable to provide comment.

The current Wii hardware is based upon processors and graphics technology supplied by IBM and AMD. These two companies have a joint development agreement together, which is described by AMD as being focused ?on delivering a range of integrated platforms to serve key markets, including ? gaming and media computing.?

The joint development agreement between IBM and AMD expires on December 31, 2011 but ?may be extended further by the mutual agreement of the parties.? This suggests that Nintendo will be leveraging research and development from the partnership in time to ensure that it?s new hardware will be compatible with the Wii?s current ?Hollywood? and ?Broadway? processors. As Microsoft learned in the transition from Xbox to Xbox 360, switching hardware vendors can make running older games on a new system a much more difficult proposition.

The dramatic bump in spending at Nintendo may also be reflective of Nintendo?s work on a rumored new DS, said to feature a camera and music player. Iterating on the DS in 2009 would certainly shake up the market, though given the incredible monthly sales of the device it hardly needs reinvigorating for the time being. When the Nintendo DS was launched in 2004, the worldwide installed base of the Game Boy Advance was 53 million (on top of the Game Boy?s incredibly huge 118 million.) So far, 80 million Nintendo DS units have been sold worldwide, and demand shows no sign of slowing.

It is unlikely that any official acknowledgement of Nintendo?s new hardware will come until at least 2009, however company president Satoru Iwata will be delivering his annual fall presentation this Wednesday.

UPDATE: Nintendo has now announced it's brand new NIntendo DSi, which features a 3 megapixel camera. We have more news about it here.

Somehow I expected responses like this. Funny how people clamour so loudly for "Give us HD, Nintendo!" and then, when their pleas are answered, proceed to lambaste the company for being too slow.

The impression I get is that "Not HD" was just an excuse to disparage Nintendo for being "Not Microsoft" and "Not Sony." That Gears of War 3, Halo 4, Uncharted 2 and Metal Gear Solid 5 could all come out on the next Wii in full 1080p/60 with the most advanced online play imaginable and people would just say "LOL, waggle! Waggle waggle waggle LOL LOL!"

Wake up. If this news is true, Nintendo plans on giving you what you asked for. Either people will be satisfied or further confirm my suspicions that they're only happy when they're bitching about something.

(Disclaimer: I do not own a Nintendo Wii. I am only an observer who is sick and tired of the one-sidedness, as well as the inherent absurdity, of game console allegiances on Neowin.)

Rubbish. They are selling loads of Wii's at the moment. Who are all these people who are not buying the Wii because there is no HD? Is this market really worth that much more?

Also it's going to be announced in 2009 but not available till 2011. That will knacker sales for 2 years.

Does this remind anyone of the DVD playing Gamecube I'm still waiting for. (Yes I'm aware of the Panasonic Q but that was only in Japan and wasn't a Nintendo product.) That was on the cards right up to the point the Wii came out.

Um, just s you know, the Wii may be able to output HD, but it isn't natively HD. Even if you got MGS5 and Halo 4 on the Wii, it would still only be upscaled. Then we have to worry about the graphical capabilites of the machine, which are really no better than the PS2 or Original X-Box, maybe even less. The games would still be stripped down because they werent designed for such lower end parts.

Now, I don't mind getting HD, I just don't see the point in it being in 2011.

Um, just s you know, the Wii may be able to output HD, but it isn't natively HD. Even if you got MGS5 and Halo 4 on the Wii, it would still only be upscaled. Then we have to worry about the graphical capabilites of the machine, which are really no better than the PS2 or Original X-Box, maybe even less. The games would still be stripped down because they werent designed for such lower end parts.

Now, I don't mind getting HD, I just don't see the point in it being in 2011.

The Gamecube was arguably on par with the XBOX (some even argue more so), so the Wii is more powerful then an XBOX.

2011? Six years after the first HD console first arrived? Talk about wow Nintendo...

exactly what i was thinking.. they better call it past-gen when it comes out cuz the new next-gen will blow it out of the water, just as the current gen blows the current Wii (read: last-gen) out of the water.

too little, way too late Nintendo.

at least they are moving in the right direction, just more than a half decade behind (assuming this article is in any way accurate, for which i will hold some reservation)

Somehow I expected responses like this. Funny how people clamour so loudly for "Give us HD, Nintendo!" and then, when their pleas are answered, proceed to lambaste the company for being too slow.

The impression I get is that "Not HD" was just an excuse to disparage Nintendo for being "Not Microsoft" and "Not Sony." That Gears of War 3, Halo 4, Uncharted 2 and Metal Gear Solid 5 could all come out on the next Wii in full 1080p/60 with the most advanced online play imaginable and people would just say "LOL, waggle! Waggle waggle waggle LOL LOL!"

Wake up. If this news is true, Nintendo plans on giving you what you asked for. Either people will be satisfied or further confirm my suspicions that they're only happy when they're bitching about something.

(Disclaimer: I do not own a Nintendo Wii. I am only an observer who is sick and tired of the one-sidedness, as well as the inherent absurdity, of game console allegiances on Neowin.)

I'm sorry: why should the company not be lambasted for being too slow to the HD game? They're praised for creating the Wii's unique motion ability, so we should just forget about everything else?

2011 is three years from now when you consider they'll likely launch around holiday time if this is true -- and that's a big if. And then we don't even know if this next console of theirs will be able to compete with the next consoles from Microsoft and Sony or if it'll just be comparable to a 360 or PS3.

If you're always one step behind, why should you not be criticized? You say people are demanding HD, well yeah... so if they launch this next console, miss a major feature and say "but our next console will have it!" they shouldn't be criticized? (N)

The Gamecube was arguably on par with the XBOX (some even argue more so), so the Wii is more powerful then an XBOX.

The Wii at the end of its life was on par with the X-Box at the very, very beginning of its lifespan graphically. That does not make them the same, it just means that they found more ways to optimize the software. No matter how hard you try, you would never get Halo 2 to run on a Gamecube and look the same and/or run as smooth.

Even if what you said was true, the 360 vs Wii is two completely different animals. The 360 has Triple Core Process with two virtual cores and a GPU at least two series higher than the Wii. Thats even a different league than the original XBox, its a monster in comparison. The Wii just would not be able to handle the games the 360 is dishing out, as it was shown by Force Unleashed (looked like Jedi Knights: Jedi Acadamy).

[edit] - I take that comparison back, Force Unleashed looks WORSE than Jedi Academy

Jedi Academy

star-wars-jedi-knight-jedi-academy-4.jpg

Force Unleashed on Wii

jedi_screen001.jpg

Edited by Emn1ty

Fine, here you go, a similar screen at an equal size. And I am not comparing the games so much as the technology they run on. It is obvious that Force Unleashed, a new game running on a newer console, does not look as good as Jedi Academy, an older game on an older console.

914575_20031120_screen018.jpg

Edited by Emn1ty
I honestly don't see why Nintendo would be showing off new hardware to developers this early. it doesn't make much sense IMO.

To get developer feedback. I doubt they have much up and running but itd be a good idea to talk to your 3rd party developers and ask them what they would like to develop for. I mean it's infamous now that Epic supposedly convinced MS to increase the ram in the console. I'd imagine alot of companies are doing research or even starting development of engines designed to be used in 2 or so years from now and if you can be given some indication of where the hardware will be that makes your jon a hell of alot easier.

I mean look at Crysis. For an industry that supposedly releases faster cards every 6 months they arrived at the very end of an extremly slow period in the GPU market that saw the 8800GTX being the market leader for something like 18 months or so. Had graphics cards kept improving like they had rather than that drought then the reception and audience that could have played that game would have been drastically different from what it was. Knowing where hardware is going in 2, 3 or more years is pretty vital to development.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!