[Rumor] High-DEF wii scheduled for 2011


Recommended Posts

My list of features that I would like to see on the "Wii HD"

  • At the very least, the graphics/sound/overall power, must be on a par with the 360/PS3, if not a giant leap forward.
  • All games must run at 1080p by default
  • Standard, user upgradable HDD
  • Blu-ray?
  • Much more precise motion controls
  • That 3D head tracking thing - http://gizmodo.com/337068/wii-headtracking...-window-display
  • A "standard" control pad for "normal" games
  • Vastly improved on-line experience. 16 digit codes? Seriously?
  • Stop being such kiddie fiddlers, and look after you old die hard fans (that got you to where you are) with some mature content. Link has got to nail Zelda one of these days, right?
    And probably a few other thinks that I can't think of right now.

Reggie has put the "kibosh" on all this anyway, but then they would say that at this point. http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/07/reggie-...s-wii-hd-rumor/

Edited by DARKFiB3R
My list of features that I would like to see on the "Wii HD"

  • At the very least, the graphics/sound/overall power, must be on a par with the 360/PS3, if not a giant leap forward.
  • All games must run at 1080p by default
  • Blu-ray?

gotta agree

they are related wii HD

they should d make it on par with PS3/X360

and blu-ray at least after two year from now will become mature unless somewho a new format came by and rendered blu-ray obsolete i dont see them not including it

I may be completely off-topic here, but SERIOUSLY?

I don't understand why people are asking for a wii to be something it's not. I don't know if people ever disillusioned themselves about the wii or what, but I know I got everything I expected out of this $250 console. For its games (currently) the 480p widescreen presentation on a 1080p TV looks absolutely fine.

But that's the thing. I never got the wii to play Grand Theft Auto or Gears of War. My mom just bought herself a wii the other week, and plays wii fit on a daily basis. Everytime my parents come over they want to play tennis or bowling with me.

When I have friends over they want to start downing beers and play Mario Kart or Mario Party or Super Smash Bros.

The concept of the wii is simple... Just have fun. I know that's a simple concept to grasp on to, but it's there. And it's easy for anyone else to play. No control scheme to memorize, no over-the-top graphics to get in the way...it's just fun. Similar to the same fun all of you had when you played Super Mario Bros for the first time, or flew with a racoon tail, or found your way out of the Lost Woods, or figured out that kneeling with a white crystal made a tornado appear, or making a hockey team full of fat guys to beat up the skinny team, or beating someone up for the first time in blades of steel, or killing 20 people at one time with a spread gun, or killing enemies in the air with a screw attack.

There's a reason why the wii and ds are the #1 selling consoles in the world... and both of them don't rely on 60fps/1080p/M-Rated games to succeed.

edit: Sorry, I know I'm rambling here off topic, but I guess I'm one of the only people out there that observes the wii succeed in my own household where my other consoles could not. The only reason people would want to turn on my 360 when I have people over is to play Rockband and that's it.

Rubbish. They are selling loads of Wii's at the moment. Who are all these people who are not buying the Wii because there is no HD? Is this market really worth that much more?

Also it's going to be announced in 2009 but not available till 2011. That will knacker sales for 2 years.

Does this remind anyone of the DVD playing Gamecube I'm still waiting for. (Yes I'm aware of the Panasonic Q but that was only in Japan and wasn't a Nintendo product.) That was on the cards right up to the point the Wii came out.

The general population didn't seem to care a whole lot about DVD playback on a Nintendo console, and judging by the Wii's sales they still don't. The Xbox's playback looked like butt anyway. I'll stick with a real DVD player.

are you serious :blink:

Why not? Since the Gamecube was better than the Xbox and the Wii is improved over the Gamecube, wouldn't it be logical to assume the Wii is better than the Xbox was as well?

I may be completely off-topic here, but SERIOUSLY?

Snip

We're not talking about the Wii here.

EDIT: And anyway, when my friends come over and have 10 beers, we wanna play something that you can just pick up and play too. The 360 and PS3 offer that right now, so I don't get you point.

EDIT 2: Mario Party? PMSL

Edited by DARKFiB3R
Why not? Since the Gamecube was better than the Xbox and the Wii is improved over the Gamecube, wouldn't it be logical to assume the Wii is better than the Xbox was as well?

And that is where you are completely wrong...

X-Box

CPU - Custom 733 MHz Intel Pentium III-based Mobile Celeron

GPU - 233 MHz nVidia NV2A

Storage - 8 or 10GB Internal HDD (Both formatted to 8 GB), 8 MB memory card

GameCube

CPU - PowerPC Gekko, 485 MHz

GPU - ATI Technologies, 162 MHz

Storage - GameCube Memory Card

Look at that. The X-Box originally had a 50% faster CPU and GPU that was faster as well. The original XB also had an internal HDD, which means it was much more flexible than the Gamecube was.

The Wii's current processor runs at 729mhz, still slower than the original XBox (surprisingly) and the GPU has a mere 64MB internal RAM while the 360 has at minimum 256MB or 512MB. That is a worlds difference.

Look at that. The X-Box originally had a 50% faster CPU and GPU that was faster as well.

Well, not necessarily. But I'm not sure it makes that much difference. Everyone knows the Wii is a beefed-up GameCube.

CelticWhisper, I see what you're saying, but the sort of people who want HD in a Wii are the sort of people that post on Neowin.

And that is where you are completely wrong...

X-Box

CPU - Custom 733 MHz Intel Pentium III-based Mobile Celeron

GPU - 233 MHz nVidia NV2A

Storage - 8 or 10GB Internal HDD (Both formatted to 8 GB), 8 MB memory card

GameCube

CPU - PowerPC Gekko, 485 MHz

GPU - ATI Technologies, 162 MHz

Storage - GameCube Memory Card

Look at that. The X-Box originally had a 50% faster CPU and GPU that was faster as well. The original XB also had an internal HDD, which means it was much more flexible than the Gamecube was.

The Wii's current processor runs at 729mhz, still slower than the original XBox (surprisingly) and the GPU has a mere 64MB internal RAM while the 360 has at minimum 256MB or 512MB. That is a worlds difference.

Well gee, look at that, someone looked at the numbers and not the architecture. PPC architecture is almost always faster then x86 (especially P3), which is why it always arguable. Also, I don't know where you get off saying it's 50% faster, when it's clearly not.

damn did anybody read the article, it's just a rumor right now guys. nothing is official. and saying that it's going to be 6 years late is uninformed since we don't even know what the specs of Nintendo's next system will be. It could be the exact specs as the next xbox/ps but you can't say until it comes out.

the topic should really be changed to rumor.

We're not talking about the Wii here.

EDIT: And anyway, when my friends come over and have 10 beers, we wanna play something that you can just pick up and play too. The 360 and PS3 offer that right now, so I don't get you point.

EDIT 2: Mario Party? PMSL

What's wrong with Mario Party? It's one of the most fun multiplayer games I've ever played. And I'm not sure what you're talking about when you say, "We're not talking about the Wii here." That's exactly what this topic is about. :)

Year 2008

Wii: Standard Definition

PS3: High Definition

Xbox 360: High Definition

Year 2011

Wii: High Definition

PS4(?): Ultra High Definition

Xbox 720(?): Ultra High Definition

:pacifier:

Do you know something about the HD market nobody else does? Many people are just now buying HD sets... They're not going to want to upgrade to an "Ultra" HD in another two years...

Year 2008

Wii: Standard Definition

PS3: High Definition

Xbox 360: High Definition

Year 2011

Wii: High Definition

PS4(?): Ultra High Definition

Xbox 720(?): Ultra High Definition

:pacifier:

:rofl:

it is 4380P i believe

have a look

7680x4320 ?

edit :

ultra-hdtv.gif

edit 2 :

one last thing

Ultra HDTV, or Super Hi-Vision, is an experimental video format conceptualized by the Japanese public broadcasting network, NHK.

Unlike standard HDTV, Ultra HDTV is four times as wide and four times as high, producing an astonishing 7,680 ? 4,320 pixel resolution. Ultra HDTV is 16 times the pixel resolution of standard HDTV. Some believe that this new technology raises Ultra HDTV health concerns.

In addition to the significant upgrade in video quality, sound quality is also significantly increased with Ultra HDTV. 24 channels of audio can be used with 24 speakers, producing a difference comparable to the video resolution.

Currently, only 2 cameras are able to capture video in Ultra HDTV format, and can only capture about 20 minutes in a single day. Needless to say, our current infrastructure is not designed to meet the Ultra HDTV requirements.

Several sources suggest that Super Hi-Vision technology will be available within the next 15 years.

Ultra HDTV

source

Edited by Skynetfuture
What's wrong with Mario Party? It's one of the most fun multiplayer games I've ever played. And I'm not sure what you're talking about when you say, "We're not talking about the Wii here." That's exactly what this topic is about. :)

It's just not my cup of tea. My gf makes me play it with her some times, (20 go's each) and it bores me to death. But each to their own.

We are not talking about the Wii here, we are talking about Nintendo's next home console, currently dubbed "Wii HD" lol. Whether it has Wii in the title or not, has nothing to do with it.

Well gee, look at that, someone looked at the numbers and not the architecture. PPC architecture is almost always faster then x86 (especially P3), which is why it always arguable. Also, I don't know where you get off saying it's 50% faster, when it's clearly not.

Than explain the GPU. While the processor line might be represented deceivingly, the GPU power is still clear. They rely on one another. Then we have the screenshots showing exactly my point. The Jedi Outcast Game, released in 2003 on the original X-Box at least has aliasing, where the Wii version of Force Unleashed does not. The game itself also looks remarkably worse than the original X-Box game, as well as incredibly worse than the 360 and PS3 versions of Force Unleashed. And this doesn't change the fact that the Wii is still far less than the other consoles today. If I fail in numbers, I succeeded in actual visual representation. The game just doesn't look as good, so saying the Wii is anywhere close to being capable of displaying games such as Halo 3 and MGS4 in an HD format without needing to downgrade the graphics is really wishful thinking.

Again: you cannot compare different games. How is that any kind of even remotely accurate comparison? I don't care if they're from the same Star Wars universe, it's not a fair comparison at all. The games aren't even being made by the same developer and likely aren't using the same engine.

I believe you meant to say that game had anti-aliasing. Aliasing is jaggies, basically, and anti-aliasing removes these. The original Xbox did not have any sort of anti-aliasing mechanism standard. It was an option available to developers. It was not used by almost any because of the massive hit required.

Is the Wii capable of Halo 3 or Metal Gear Solid 4? Absolutely not. I don't think anyone's argued that. But your statements that the original Xbox are more powerful than it are erroneous.

And your visual "evidence"? Screenshots at GameSpot -- which uses a direct capture card to get its screens -- shows it has aliasing and it really doesn't look any better. It looks worse.

Xbox:

914575_20031120_screen015.jpg

Wii:

939633_20080912_screen007.jpg

But again: this isn't a valid comparison. Different developers, graphics engines, games, etc.

And that is where you are completely wrong...

X-Box

CPU - Custom 733 MHz Intel Pentium III-based Mobile Celeron

GPU - 233 MHz nVidia NV2A

Storage - 8 or 10GB Internal HDD (Both formatted to 8 GB), 8 MB memory card

GameCube

CPU - PowerPC Gekko, 485 MHz

GPU - ATI Technologies, 162 MHz

Storage - GameCube Memory Card

Look at that. The X-Box originally had a 50% faster CPU and GPU that was faster as well. The original XB also had an internal HDD, which means it was much more flexible than the Gamecube was.

The Wii's current processor runs at 729mhz, still slower than the original XBox (surprisingly) and the GPU has a mere 64MB internal RAM while the 360 has at minimum 256MB or 512MB. That is a worlds difference.

Bravo, you just regurgitated some numbers. You conveniently avoided the reality of the 2 systems, which was there GC games that looked far better than anything that ever came out on the Xbox. And they played better, too.

I may be completely off-topic here, but SERIOUSLY?

I don't understand why people are asking for a wii to be something it's not. I don't know if people ever disillusioned themselves about the wii or what, but I know I got everything I expected out of this $250 console. For its games (currently) the 480p widescreen presentation on a 1080p TV looks absolutely fine

....

The concept of the wii is simple... Just have fun. I know that's a simple concept to grasp on to, but it's there. And it's easy for anyone else to play. No control scheme to memorize, no over-the-top graphics to get in the way...it's just fun. ....

Well firstly I don't think anyones asking the Wii to be what it isn't, but they do want to see progress made next time. Anyway IMHO I want a far more powerful system, not because it allows for better graphics as much as it allows for more options for developers to code certain types of games. I mean have we really seen any games that compare to say Oblivion or far cry 2 on the Wii which uses large open outdoor areas and isn't a cartoonish game? To me the biggest problem when they limited the powerof the Wii wasn't that games ceased to look good but certain types of games became pretty infeasible to develop. A more powerful system means alot more than a prettier image, it means better physics, more characters ect on screen and all of that too which are more gameplay related than they are graphics related.

I dont think it has to be as powerful as an XBox 720 or whatever, but it would be nice if it wasn't stuck at a last generation of hardware. Something between say a 360 and the followup would be perfectly acceptable. It also might get some more mainstream titles on the console because god knows the Wii couldnt do with some ports of AAA titles on other consoles right now.

As for the GameCube vs XBox. I think Joels right in that the two were pretty close. Ok maybe the XBox did slightly better but for the most part the titles that were done well on the GC tended to compare well to those on the XBox. Titles like Mario Sunshine or Resident Evil. Yes there are exceptions and it's hardly worth using a poorly coded port of a star wars game as any measure between the consoles. We all know the hardware between the Wii and GC is pretty similar so obviously some games will look worse than the GC counterparts if they are developed poorly.

I would like to see some of those games that you are claiming look better on the gamecube. It could all be narrowed down to personal preference considering games such as Forza Motorsport, Burnout 3: Takedown and Halo 2 all looked phenominal on the system. Even Halo CE still looks fantastic IMO, of course not exactly better than anything on the Gamecube.

Aside from that, the whole point of the argument was really about the claim that the Wii could handle MGS5 and Halo 4 just because it can suddenly output HD, which was bogus.

This is actually a double post :p

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=677816

Aside from that, the whole point of the argument was really about the claim that the Wii could handle MGS5 and Halo 4 just because it can suddenly output HD, which was bogus.

Who said that? :laugh:

Anyway, I'd welcome a Wii HD tomorrow.

I hate looking at 480p on a 1080p set.

Don't care if it has PS3/360 graphics, just properly supporting HD with a decent level of graphics would be (Y)

I may be completely off-topic here, but SERIOUSLY?

I don't understand why people are asking for a wii to be something it's not. I don't know if people ever disillusioned themselves about the wii or what, but I know I got everything I expected out of this $250 console. For its games (currently) the 480p widescreen presentation on a 1080p TV looks absolutely fine.

But that's the thing. I never got the wii to play Grand Theft Auto or Gears of War. My mom just bought herself a wii the other week, and plays wii fit on a daily basis. Everytime my parents come over they want to play tennis or bowling with me.

When I have friends over they want to start downing beers and play Mario Kart or Mario Party or Super Smash Bros.

The concept of the wii is simple... Just have fun. I know that's a simple concept to grasp on to, but it's there. And it's easy for anyone else to play. No control scheme to memorize, no over-the-top graphics to get in the way...it's just fun. Similar to the same fun all of you had when you played Super Mario Bros for the first time, or flew with a racoon tail, or found your way out of the Lost Woods, or figured out that kneeling with a white crystal made a tornado appear, or making a hockey team full of fat guys to beat up the skinny team, or beating someone up for the first time in blades of steel, or killing 20 people at one time with a spread gun, or killing enemies in the air with a screw attack.

There's a reason why the wii and ds are the #1 selling consoles in the world... and both of them don't rely on 60fps/1080p/M-Rated games to succeed.

edit: Sorry, I know I'm rambling here off topic, but I guess I'm one of the only people out there that observes the wii succeed in my own household where my other consoles could not. The only reason people would want to turn on my 360 when I have people over is to play Rockband and that's it.

I applaud you for having a clue.

Apparently some people feel bad because their ultra powerful console of choice is losing against what they call "last gen" hardware.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!