[Rumor] High-DEF wii scheduled for 2011


Recommended Posts

I applaud you for having a clue.

Apparently some people feel bad because their ultra powerful console of choice is losing against what they call "last gen" hardware.

Losing what exactly? Hardware sales? Pfftt who really cares. All I know is theres about half a dozen games for my 360 I want coming out this Xmas and not a single one for my Wii (except Mad World if thats due by then). I could care less which one sells the more hardware, if anything software sales are more important to a platforms longevity IMHO.

The console COULD use some more powerful hardware. Pretty much all the big titles on the machine are Nintendos in house titles. They are really struggling to get anything big out of 3rd parties besides maybe Guitar Hero. If ports were a viable option for some of the more advanced games the Wii would be in an even better position than it is now. I mean, companies such as Epic, Valve, ID and I'm sure others have all said they think the Wii looks interesting yet none have committed to any development because it would require them developing the game specifically for the hardware. It's not totally unrelated to the criticisms the PS3 drew for being too complex to develop for.

Year 2008

Wii: Standard Definition

PS3: High Definition

Xbox 360: High Definition

Year 2011

Wii: High Definition

PS4(?): Ultra High Definition

Xbox 720(?): Ultra High Definition

:pacifier:

Considering the XBOX 360 and Playstation 3 (XBOX 360 more specifically) is struggling to get anything major running at 1080p @ 60FPS, and games like Far Cry 2 can't even reach 720p @ 60FPS (not that I'm bashing the game, it's just an example), I sincerely doubt they're going to up the resolution standard even higher again. Much the like the N64 (and I think the PS1) made 640x480 possible, the generation after that (PS2, GCN, XBOX) are going to make that the standard for every game (with the odd one or two pushing 720p). This, in combination with the overwhelming majority of TV sets not being able to do anything past 1080p, means 1080p will become the standard, much like 720p is right now for the HD consoles.

yeah there won't be an increase for the next generation. They would need TV's ect to be available and in most places HD is only just beginning to catch on. It's probably another half decade to a decade before we see another jump IMHO.

Losing what exactly? Hardware sales? Pfftt who really cares. All I know is theres about half a dozen games for my 360 I want coming out this Xmas and not a single one for my Wii (except Mad World if thats due by then). I could care less which one sells the more hardware, if anything software sales are more important to a platforms longevity IMHO.

Well, judging by some comments I read here, looks like a lot of people care. Nintendo is kicking ass when it comes to sales and it's also selling a lot of games, even with older hardware, and that seems to raise some hate around here.

So you don't want games for your Wii this Christmas, fine, but you're not everyone else I guess. I'm also not getting any games for the Wii this Christmas, but I'm sure many will and they'll be satisfied.

My main point to everyone is: let Nintendo be Nintendo. If you want powerful hardware, MS and Sony have your back, don't like it, don't buy it. Remember that games are about fun, not MHz.

Well, judging by some comments I read here, looks like a lot of people care. Nintendo is kicking ass when it comes to sales and it's also selling a lot of games, even with older hardware, and that seems to raise some hate around here.

So you don't want games for your Wii this Christmas, fine, but you're not everyone else I guess. I'm also not getting any games for the Wii this Christmas, but I'm sure many will and they'll be satisfied.

My main point to everyone is: let Nintendo be Nintendo. If you want powerful hardware, MS and Sony have your back, don't like it, don't buy it. Remember that games are about fun, not MHz.

Well at least acknowledge my output.

I said Nintendo don't need cutting edge expensive powerful hardware like Sony/MS.

What they do need IMO, is support for current TV's, in other words, support HD.

480p is not HD and looks pretty damn crappy on my 40" TV.

Outputting 1080p, or even just 720p, for simpler games in terms of textures/graphics clearly isn't as taxing. Hence why just about every PSN title/XBLA title can do native 1080p and usually 60FPS.

720p would be enough for Nintendo though, just support HD...

yeah there won't be an increase for the next generation. They would need TV's ect to be available and in most places HD is only just beginning to catch on. It's probably another half decade to a decade before we see another jump IMHO.

Um I think HDTVs are fairly common nowadays.

They do not cost a lot of money for a basic 24-32" TV.

Hardly anywhere, if anywhere, sells SDTVs now in large numbers.

But Nintendo used to have cutting edge hardware! NES, SNES, N64, were all great for their time, then it all went ###### up with the game cube, and they got left behind.

I feel let down by Nintendo, they haven't grown with me.

They do not cost a lot of money for a basic 24-32" TV.

Decent 32" HDTVs are hardly cheap. They're something like ?450+ (usually in the ?500 range). When I buy a TV, it's a big investment, I don't want to buy some knock off one only for it to die in a couple of years. Plus, I want one with a decent featureset, not something stupid like 1 HDMI port and 2 scart ports, which is ridiculous. Anyway, when you say output at 720p, do you think you'd be comfortable with the Wii having an upscaler (just like 360's HANA)? I'm just curious.

@DARKFiB3R - It actually all went ###### up with the N64, commercially speaking. The N64 was an amazing console, and hosts some of the greatest games of all time (Zelda: OoT, Goldeneye). The Gamecube, while a commercial failure, gave Nintendo a lot of money (which they needed) and still had it's fair share of gems (RE4, Twilight Princess, SSBM)

Decent 32" HDTVs are hardly cheap. They're something like ?450+ (usually in the ?500 range). When I buy a TV, it's a big investment, I don't want to buy some knock off one only for it to die in a couple of years. Plus, I want one with a decent featureset, not something stupid like 1 HDMI port and 2 scart ports, which is ridiculous. Anyway, when you say output at 720p, do you think you'd be comfortable with the Wii having an upscaler (just like 360's HANA)? I'm just curious.

@DARKFiB3R - It actually all went ###### up with the N64, commercially speaking. The N64 was an amazing console, and hosts some of the greatest games of all time (Zelda: OoT, Goldeneye). The Gamecube, while a commercial failure, gave Nintendo a lot of money (which they needed) and still had it's fair share of gems (RE4, Twilight Princess, SSBM)

Decent 32" HDTVs are hardly cheap. They're something like ?450+ (usually in the ?500 range).

No, taken from large retailers as that's who most casuals would buy from (I can get these TVs even cheaper on more "indie" electronics sites). I think you're a bit out on your pricing of TVs.

Around ?350

Sharp - http://www.dixons.co.uk/martprd/store/dix_...gory_oid=-21226

Samsung - http://www.dixons.co.uk/martprd/store/dix_...gory_oid=-21226[/uIndie sitess

Sony 32" TVs under/around ?350

Sony - http://www.digitaldirect.co.uk/sony/kdl32v4000.html

Sony - http://www.digitaldirect.co.uk/sony/kdl32p3000.html

If you go to less known brand name TV's, you can get 32" sets for like ?300, sometimes ?250-300.

Then you're not the type of person my comments made towards.

I'm talking about people who see HD, then buy a TV in Asda.

We can't bitch about HDTV prices, then categorise the whole UK population as people who will only buy top end HDTVs. That's not the way it's going to work.

People flock to prices primarily, if you can get HDTVs cheap at decent prices, people will buy before thinking "Ohhh I need two HDMI ports/This contrast ratio is lower/ect".

I'd have to see what the quality was like.

However for the next-gen Wii, definitely not.

I expect HD support.

I'd of been happier with 720p upscaling THIS generation.

Um I think HDTVs are fairly common nowadays.

They do not cost a lot of money for a basic 24-32" TV.

Hardly anywhere, if anywhere, sells SDTVs now in large numbers.

Yeah they are now but it's only a recent thing and the cheaper ones are still only 720p. Theres plenty of non HD sets out there still and then the low end of the market is being filled with 720p sets so I dont see us going to something beyond 1080p for some time. Nor do I think we need to. 1900x1200/1080p like resolutions is still for many intents a bit of a performance barrier not only for consoles but PC's too. I wouldnt be surprised if higher res computer displays became more common than they are now before we see something above 1080p given computer specifications are a bit more flexible in those regards.

Yeah they are now but it's only a recent thing and the cheaper ones are still only 720p. Theres plenty of non HD sets out there still and then the low end of the market is being filled with 720p sets so I dont see us going to something beyond 1080p for some time. Nor do I think we need to. 1900x1200/1080p like resolutions is still for many intents a bit of a performance barrier not only for consoles but PC's too. I wouldnt be surprised if higher res computer displays became more common than they are now before we see something above 1080p given computer specifications are a bit more flexible in those regards.

A Wii doing 720p is fine for me.

I just strive for basic HD support, that's all.

Makes menus/games much crisper and easier to read/play when you're playing on a 40" HDTV set.

Majority of TVs on the market will be 720p for like, AGES. Most living rooms will probably snatch a 32" set. Those going to 40/42" will probably buy cheap (and end up with 720p) before they buy more expensive 1080p 40/42" sets.

No, taken from large retailers as that's who most casuals would buy from (I can get these TVs even cheaper on more "indie" electronics sites). I think you're a bit out on your pricing of TVs.

Around ?350

Sharp - http://www.dixons.co.uk/martprd/store/dix_...gory_oid=-21226

Samsung - http://www.dixons.co.uk/martprd/store/dix_...gory_oid=-21226

Indie sites>

Sony 32" TVs under/around ?350

Sony - http://www.digitaldirect.co.uk/sony/kdl32v4000.html

Sony - http://www.digitaldirect.co.uk/sony/kdl32p3000.html

If you go to less known brand name TV's, you can get 32" sets for like ?300, sometimes ?250-300.

I hate to sound nitpicky (and it's not because I'm trying to be awkward), but to be honest, if I was getting an HD set I'd definitely want Full HD 1080p, 720p will only last me a couple of years and then it'll feel outdated. Thanks for searching for these, though, much appreciated. I wasn't aware HDTVs were this cheap.

Then you're not the type of person my comments made towards.

I'm talking about people who see HD, then buy a TV in Asda.

We can't bitch about HDTV prices, then categorise the whole UK population as people who will only buy top end HDTVs. That's not the way it's going to work.

People flock to prices primarily, if you can get HDTVs cheap at decent prices, people will buy before thinking "Ohhh I need two HDMI ports/This contrast ratio is lower/ect".

Ah, sorry, I guess I kind of took your post out of context t:pn :p The majority of people do, yes, flock to prices primarily. The problem there is, these are the same people that will see stuff like "Wii can do HD!" and then feel they need an HDTV to get anything out of it, which while is untrue, it's a mindset. It's a mindset that may detract some people away from the Wii, or confuse them. Considering this is the casual audience and not the hardcore crowd, this is possible. You could counter argue that you simply do not market this feature, or people who don't understand won't care, but I honestly don't feel this is the case. I've had quite a few people ask me "So do you need an HDTV to play the XBOX 360 then?" simply because it's marketed as an HD console. If this is going to confuse some 360 potential buyers, it's definitely going to confuse some Wii potential buyers. It's a double edged sword.

I'd have to see what the quality was like.

However for the next-gen Wii, definitely not.

I expect HD support.

I'd of been happier with 720p upscaling THIS generation.

Oh yeah, I was talking about this generation. There's no way an upscaler chip and let people do 480p next generation is acceptable. That's not on. If Wii doesn't do 1080p natively, that is taking the mickey. I understand what the Wii philosophy is, but come on, even phones with TV out can bloody output 640x480. I do believe Reggie said the next Nintendo console will do HD, though, so hopefully they stick to that.

I hate to sound nitpicky (and it's not because I'm trying to be awkward), but to be honest, if I was getting an HD set I'd definitely want Full HD 1080p, 720p will only last me a couple of years and then it'll feel outdated. Thanks for searching for these, though, much appreciated. I wasn't aware HDTVs were this cheap.

You are joking right? ...

I bet you also want those glories 1080p in a nifty 26" package?

I hate to sound nitpicky (and it's not because I'm trying to be awkward), but to be honest, if I was getting an HD set I'd definitely want Full HD 1080p, 720p will only last me a couple of years and then it'll feel outdated. Thanks for searching for these, though, much appreciated. I wasn't aware HDTVs were this cheap.

Ah, sorry, I guess I kind of took your post out of context then :p The majority of people do, yes, flock to prices primarily. The problem there is, these are the same people that will see stuff like "Wii can do HD!" and then feel they need an HDTV to get anything out of it, which while is untrue, it's a mindset. It's a mindset that may detract some people away from the Wii, or confuse them. Considering this is the casual audience and not the hardcore crowd, this is possible. You could counter argue that you simply do not market this feature, or people who don't understand won't care, but I honestly don't feel this is the case. I've had quite a few people ask me "So do you need an HDTV to play the XBOX 360 then?" simply because it's marketed as an HD console. If this is going to confuse some 360 potential buyers, it's definitely going to confuse some Wii potential buyers. It's a double edged sword.

Oh yeah, I was talking about this generation. There's no way an upscaler chip and let people do 480p next generation is acceptable. That's not on. If Wii doesn't do 1080p natively, that is taking the mickey. I understand what the Wii philosophy is, but come on, even phones with TV out can bloody output 640x480. I do believe Reggie said the next Nintendo console will do HD, though, so hopefully they stick to that.

You don't really need 1080p for a 32" set... so yeah, that is quite nitpicky :p

I still think a 720p Wii for next-gen would be fine.

I think unless we're using cutting edge technology 1080p might still be requiring a good effort on hardware/developers next-gen, and I don't see Nintendo going all horse power with the next Wii.

Maybe not but, we're starting to hear of more 1080p native games hitting this generation.

Sadly, if it matters to you, I think Nintendo will continue this trend of delivering under powered hardware that's cheaper out the door.

Unless of course things take a tidal wave of a change this generation, it's still only 2/3 years in, you'd be mighty adventurous to say this generations all wrapped up yet :whistle:

The 360/PS3 have the longevity in hardware power/future proof-ness (excluding BR on the 360), so will things be different for the Wii in 5-6 years time? Would this cause Nintendo to power up the next Wii a little more than a Gamecube 1.25? Who knows yet...

All I know is HD support is a must in some fashion (Y)

A Wii doing 720p is fine for me.

I just strive for basic HD support, that's all.

Ohh I agree they should have 720/1080. I was replying to the post before mine in regards to the "super high definition" which I assume was supposed to be something beyond 1080. I think the next Wii will be 1080p mind you and it shouldnt be too expensive to produce one if the 360 and PS3 can do it now and they are a couple of years old currently so by 2011 I can't see it being a huge issue.

You are joking right? ...

I bet you also want those glories 1080p in a nifty 26" package?

I don't see why me demanding 1080p on a 32" set is so out of order when people are playing @ 1680x1050 on 22" PC monitors. To be honest though, I'd probably go for a 36" TV now that they're all flatscreen (and yes, I'd want that to be 1080p).

I don't see why me demanding 1080p on a 32" set is so out of order when people are playing @ 1680x1050 on 22" PC monitors. To be honest though, I'd probably go for a 36" TV now that they're all flatscreen (and yes, I'd want that to be 1080p).

Difference being scalers in TVs are better than those in monitors in most cases.

Hence why monitors look like **** if ran under their native res, where as a 40" 1080p TV, if ran in 720p, still looks sharp/crisp.

Difference being scalers in TVs are better than those in monitors in most cases.

Hence why monitors look like **** if ran under their native res, where as a 40" 1080p TV, if ran in 720p, still looks sharp/crisp.

Ok, fair point. But still, I don't see why I'm being frowned upon so badly just for wanting a 1080p set on a 32" TV (which like I said, to be honest, I'd probably go for a 36" instead).

Ok, fair point. But still, I don't see why I'm being frowned upon so badly just for wanting a 1080p set on a 32" TV (which like I said, to be honest, I'd probably go for a 36" instead).

Not frowned upon, I'm just giving some advice.

Buying a high end 720p 32" set is money better spent than going after 1080p support at that size.

36" would start making more sense for 1080p, although the general "rule of thumb" people kick about is 1080p for 40"+.

Ok, fair point. But still, I don't see why I'm being frowned upon so badly just for wanting a 1080p set on a 32" TV (which like I said, to be honest, I'd probably go for a 36" instead).

Because 1080p is not a technological advancement over 720p, it's just to 'compensate' for the bigger TV. You can barely see the difference between 1080p and 720p on a sub-40" TV.

This discussion always comes up every time there is talk about flatscreen TVs. So stop seeing 1080p as superior over 720p like its a hardware upgrade.

Oh and Full HD is not a quality stamp either.

Bit like saying your new Ferrari is obsolete because it can't use 24" rims, just a matter of size!

Because 1080p is not a technological advancement over 720p, it's just to 'compensate' for the bigger TV. You can barely see the difference between 1080p and 720p on a sub-40" TV.

This discussion always comes up every time there is talk about flatscreen TVs. So stop seeing 1080p as superior over 720p like its a hardware upgrade.

Oh and Full HD is not a quality stamp either.

Bit like saying your new Ferrari is obsolete because it can't use 24" rims, just a matter of size!

But it is a technological advancement?

It's outputting more pixels, therefore better quality.

Not really compensating for the real estate, as the TV scaler will happily do that for you scaling 720p/any other input to fit the screen.

However on sub-40" TVs, having your eyes try to notice the difference would be a task, therefore making it near pointless investing in a TV that size that outputs at that resolution.

Well at least acknowledge my output.

I said Nintendo don't need cutting edge expensive powerful hardware like Sony/MS.

What they do need IMO, is support for current TV's, in other words, support HD.

480p is not HD and looks pretty damn crappy on my 40" TV.

I see your point, and I somewhat agree with it. This is a problem you get between technology transitions (SD->HD in this case), Nintendo opted for SD this gen... HD support would be nice indeed, and I have no doubt it'll be in Nintendo's next console.

The only thing that bugs me Audio, is people wishing the Wii to be something it's certainly not.

In my point of view, Nintendo segmented the Wii very clearly from the beginning. It was an entry level, party-oriented console. You can clearly see that from the games available, the "waggle" control schemes and the low price.

It's not supposed to be competing in horse power with the other consoles, it certainly wasn't designed to be a media do-it-all, it's merely an entry level console system for the masses, so asking for the Wii to be like a PS3/360 is like asking Peugeot to make the 107 with a 300HP engine and leather seats.

One could say that MS made a smart move by providing different models of the 360, so that it would cater to both "low end" and "high end" markets. Sony opted as we know for the high-end market alone and Nintendo stuck with the low end. Can we really blame them for that? Personally I don't think so, because I believe there's a console for everyone between these 3 brands.

To sum it up, I think in a few years HD sets will be widely available, with HD support being mandatory at least. Right now the Wii is just a "low end" home console and I think it does its job very well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!