Does Anyone Else Miss the Good Ol' Days of Mac?


Recommended Posts

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer"

People with Smart cars do that too =/

Hey, I own 3 Macs, and i'm proud to own them.

I've never been a Mac owner, let alone liking Macs.

Since they became "Real pcs" (Reads: has an Intel cpu), I've come to like them as an innovative computer, very reliable, stylish, fast and quite easy to use.

I'd never trade my main pc in for a Mac, but that doesn't stop me liking the new Macs.

(Side note: 2 of my 3 macs run on Windows alone, so no flaming :p)

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

On a somewhat related note, I remember wearing Euro metal band shirts ten years ago - when they were impossible to find and needed to be imported. On occasion, somebody would come up to me and give me a smile or an approving nod. It was a nice ego boost; but times change and those shirts are now available in Hot Topic. I got over my musical elitism and began to embrace mainstream homogenization of something that once made me unique.

Posted from my MacBook Pro :)

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

On a somewhat related note, I remember wearing Euro metal band shirts ten years ago - when they were impossible to find and needed to be imported. On occasion, somebody would come up to me and give me a smile or an approving nod. It was a nice ego boost; but times change and those shirts are now available in Hot Topic. I got over my musical elitism and began to embrace mainstream homogenization of something that once made me unique.

Posted from my MacBook Pro :)

You obviusly should have stopped listening to the music you lighten and found another suitably crap music genre noone else lsiten to just so you could continue being a musical elitist, damn sellout :p

the unique-ness is going away because...more and more people are owning Macs.

I don't see a problem...unless you like being Elitist.

I'm happy to see more Macs out there....and the switch to Intel has made a drastic change in the market gains.

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

...

Why does nobody remember this, Pre OS X MacOS sucked, and so did early OS X.

I am very glad that Apple switched to Intel Processors because now is where they can really get the quality standard that for years Apple never meet, for example in the G4 era, it was so common to see how these computer die or have defect in the motherboard. Now Apple have a more superior support from Intel to design high quality products, I believe Apple today have a more better stand than anytime in the past.

You obviusly should have stopped listening to the music you lighten and found another suitably crap music genre noone else lsiten to just so you could continue being a musical elitist, damn sellout :p

I'm listening to nothing but Miley Cyrus and The Jonas Brothers these days. It's the ultimate act of ironic rebellion.

If it weren't for Apple switching to x86 processors, there would be no way in hell I'd consider an Apple machine. Being stuck with OS X and the few odd *nix distros compiled for PPC is not an option.

Now, why not? Just a matter of waiting until ... this laptop's due for a replacement.

Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you people hold.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

And people would be like wow, you use a Mac? What's it like. (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, Mac fanatic.) I'd tell them all about the G4 (Subsequently, the G5) processor, and the megahertz myth. (Some of you will know what I'm talking about right off the bat, I'm sure. We're the people who freaked out about the Cube. ;) )

As a owner of multiple Macintosh systems over the years, including a very expensive 1.467 GHz G4 system, I'm pretty sure there is no MHz myth. Well, there was a misconception regarding Apple's hyping of the G4 chip. The first home PC super-computer is what they called it I belive. Capable of doing like a billion whatever-the-hecks-a-second or something.

But how did that translate into real-world apps? Photoshop benchmarks are nice. But do most Mac users just sit at their desk using that all day?

If something is optimized for G4/AltiVec, then it's pretty quick. However, for MOST of the stuff I've ran, that isn't the case.

A lot of what I've tried to run is x86 ports of stuff. PowerPC-compatible games, Flash, and other stuff just runs so freaking slow.

Games and apps that played fine on a Pentium 3 would be be a slideshow on my 1.467 GHz G4.

Obviously, that is the fault of the programmer. But something like Firefox and Flash gets used almost daily by me, and knowing that my "faster" and certainly more expensive Mac gets its butt handed to it by an old "throw-away" P3 system is sad.

And a big issue now: Even Apple has abandoned PowerPC. Hardly any companies optimized for G4 before, and the chance of that happening now is even less.

a mac pc is one of the olderst pc's that i've ever used in my life...

they were pretty good, which has lots of multimedia features (for an old pc about a decade ago).

quite a simple interface, most things were straight forward. :)

performance was fine, not too slow, but it hangs after using quite sometime.

overall, it was a good experience with it.

1996? You mean the years we use to have macs in the library in high school and they use to crash once every 5 mins and would always have to be restarted.

The Mac OS was just about as bad as windows 98 before OSX.

I miss the good ol' days of DOS and the games that were made in the 90's...

Ahh THANK YOU! Now that's something worth missing. DOS... the best gaming platform ever made. Of course, it's a coincidence that the 90's were also the era of the best PC Games ever. Today it's just clone after clone after clone.

And, yes, when most people think about Macs of the 90's they think of the System Bomb "An error has occurred... restart" screens and that's about it. Paying more for a computer that crashed constantly is no reason to feel special.

you know I know exactly what you are talking about, I mean there are alot of things that people own that are like that, like owning a JEEP used to be, now everyone and there brother has a cherokee or a Liberty, so no more flashing the headlights at each other, or sticking your hand out to wave at each other when you pass by.

I mean its good because at least you know more people are using mac's now, which is great for those of you who want it to continue to grow and make great products... But at the same time it sucks because you aren't special anymore ;)

Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you people hold.

I wouldn't say "you people" since not every Mac user thinks that way. I mean, its just a computer, albeit a considerably more expensive one, that does pretty much the same thing a Windows PC does. It's just a little different in some ways.

I wouldn't say "you people" since not every Mac user thinks that way. I mean, its just a computer, albeit a considerably more expensive one, that does pretty much the same thing a Windows PC does. It's just a little different in some ways.

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

Oh I wasn't offended, and I don't see how people could perceive your statement as offensive. I was just quoting that part to help make my point - that some Mac users just see it as another kind of computer, and nothing to be elitist about. :)

Why does nobody remember this, Pre OS X MacOS sucked, and so did early OS X.

Maybe because a 9500/200 running 9.1 was the only computer at the time that could two streams of uncompressed 720x480 video at the same time (utilizing an 18GB SCSI-2 ARRAY for $4k).

Ahh THANK YOU! Now that's something worth missing. DOS... the best gaming platform ever made. Of course, it's a coincidence that the 90's were also the era of the best PC Games ever. Today it's just clone after clone after clone.

Ah, yes, the endless editions of Config.sys and autoexec.bat because some games required extended memory and other required expanded memory.

The hours passed trying to move the TSRs out of the conventional memory elsewhere to milk the last bytes of the 640KB limit to make the game start.

And for each and every single of the games, the little prayer Port 220, IRQ 5, DMA 1 to have the Sound Blaster recognized and you could not get your friend to help because he had a Gravis ultrasound ....

Three hours spend dealing in the arcane of himem.sys and emm386.exe before playing ....

SET SARCASM=Off

The games might have been good (I have very fond memories of Origin Systems Game) but DOS was like whipping yourself with a leather belt

1996? You mean the years we use to have macs in the library in high school and they use to crash once every 5 mins and would always have to be restarted.

The Mac OS was just about as bad as windows 98 before OSX.

Hey, Windows 98 was awesome.

Try using Windows ME. I unfortunately ran Windows ME.

Ah, yes, the endless editions of Config.sys and autoexec.bat because some games required extended memory and other required expanded memory.

The hours passed trying to move the TSRs out of the conventional memory elsewhere to milk the last bytes of the 640KB limit to make the game start.

And for each and every single of the games, the little prayer Port 220, IRQ 5, DMA 1 to have the Sound Blaster recognized and you could not get your friend to help because he had a Gravis ultrasound ....

Three hours spend dealing in the arcane of himem.sys and emm386.exe before playing ....

SET SARCASM=Off

The games might have been good (I have very fond memories of Origin Systems Game) but DOS was like whipping yourself with a leather belt

Wow, I remember it taking 5 hours to get Commanche to run on my 486DX. Good times. That is when building a PC took skill.

It's no different than the acknowledgement that you get from the guy using the machine you want at the gym,

or the other guy stopped in a BMW at the traffic light.

While it might be the first time you've noticed it's got nothing on, the sense of community you encounter

from photographers, and that has nothing on what you get when you ride a motorcycle.

My computer choice never made me a unique snowflake so, not only do I not miss it, I'm glad for other people

because it means that more people are using 'better' computers and having the same experience I do.

If you really think owning a mac is better, why wouldn't you want everyone to experience that? I don't

subscribe to the idea that others have to be unhappy or less productive for me to be successful, happy, etc.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

It was kinda elitist. And I was a stereotype in flesh. But I kinda miss it. -- Don't get me wrong, though. I still love my Mac.

and that's the kind of stupid, smug attitude that is associated with apple users. thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!