Does Anyone Else Miss the Good Ol' Days of Mac?


Recommended Posts

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer"

People with Smart cars do that too =/

Hey, I own 3 Macs, and i'm proud to own them.

I've never been a Mac owner, let alone liking Macs.

Since they became "Real pcs" (Reads: has an Intel cpu), I've come to like them as an innovative computer, very reliable, stylish, fast and quite easy to use.

I'd never trade my main pc in for a Mac, but that doesn't stop me liking the new Macs.

(Side note: 2 of my 3 macs run on Windows alone, so no flaming :p)

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

On a somewhat related note, I remember wearing Euro metal band shirts ten years ago - when they were impossible to find and needed to be imported. On occasion, somebody would come up to me and give me a smile or an approving nod. It was a nice ego boost; but times change and those shirts are now available in Hot Topic. I got over my musical elitism and began to embrace mainstream homogenization of something that once made me unique.

Posted from my MacBook Pro :)

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

On a somewhat related note, I remember wearing Euro metal band shirts ten years ago - when they were impossible to find and needed to be imported. On occasion, somebody would come up to me and give me a smile or an approving nod. It was a nice ego boost; but times change and those shirts are now available in Hot Topic. I got over my musical elitism and began to embrace mainstream homogenization of something that once made me unique.

Posted from my MacBook Pro :)

You obviusly should have stopped listening to the music you lighten and found another suitably crap music genre noone else lsiten to just so you could continue being a musical elitist, damn sellout :p

the unique-ness is going away because...more and more people are owning Macs.

I don't see a problem...unless you like being Elitist.

I'm happy to see more Macs out there....and the switch to Intel has made a drastic change in the market gains.

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

...

Why does nobody remember this, Pre OS X MacOS sucked, and so did early OS X.

I am very glad that Apple switched to Intel Processors because now is where they can really get the quality standard that for years Apple never meet, for example in the G4 era, it was so common to see how these computer die or have defect in the motherboard. Now Apple have a more superior support from Intel to design high quality products, I believe Apple today have a more better stand than anytime in the past.

You obviusly should have stopped listening to the music you lighten and found another suitably crap music genre noone else lsiten to just so you could continue being a musical elitist, damn sellout :p

I'm listening to nothing but Miley Cyrus and The Jonas Brothers these days. It's the ultimate act of ironic rebellion.

If it weren't for Apple switching to x86 processors, there would be no way in hell I'd consider an Apple machine. Being stuck with OS X and the few odd *nix distros compiled for PPC is not an option.

Now, why not? Just a matter of waiting until ... this laptop's due for a replacement.

Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you people hold.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

And people would be like wow, you use a Mac? What's it like. (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, Mac fanatic.) I'd tell them all about the G4 (Subsequently, the G5) processor, and the megahertz myth. (Some of you will know what I'm talking about right off the bat, I'm sure. We're the people who freaked out about the Cube. ;) )

As a owner of multiple Macintosh systems over the years, including a very expensive 1.467 GHz G4 system, I'm pretty sure there is no MHz myth. Well, there was a misconception regarding Apple's hyping of the G4 chip. The first home PC super-computer is what they called it I belive. Capable of doing like a billion whatever-the-hecks-a-second or something.

But how did that translate into real-world apps? Photoshop benchmarks are nice. But do most Mac users just sit at their desk using that all day?

If something is optimized for G4/AltiVec, then it's pretty quick. However, for MOST of the stuff I've ran, that isn't the case.

A lot of what I've tried to run is x86 ports of stuff. PowerPC-compatible games, Flash, and other stuff just runs so freaking slow.

Games and apps that played fine on a Pentium 3 would be be a slideshow on my 1.467 GHz G4.

Obviously, that is the fault of the programmer. But something like Firefox and Flash gets used almost daily by me, and knowing that my "faster" and certainly more expensive Mac gets its butt handed to it by an old "throw-away" P3 system is sad.

And a big issue now: Even Apple has abandoned PowerPC. Hardly any companies optimized for G4 before, and the chance of that happening now is even less.

a mac pc is one of the olderst pc's that i've ever used in my life...

they were pretty good, which has lots of multimedia features (for an old pc about a decade ago).

quite a simple interface, most things were straight forward. :)

performance was fine, not too slow, but it hangs after using quite sometime.

overall, it was a good experience with it.

1996? You mean the years we use to have macs in the library in high school and they use to crash once every 5 mins and would always have to be restarted.

The Mac OS was just about as bad as windows 98 before OSX.

I miss the good ol' days of DOS and the games that were made in the 90's...

Ahh THANK YOU! Now that's something worth missing. DOS... the best gaming platform ever made. Of course, it's a coincidence that the 90's were also the era of the best PC Games ever. Today it's just clone after clone after clone.

And, yes, when most people think about Macs of the 90's they think of the System Bomb "An error has occurred... restart" screens and that's about it. Paying more for a computer that crashed constantly is no reason to feel special.

you know I know exactly what you are talking about, I mean there are alot of things that people own that are like that, like owning a JEEP used to be, now everyone and there brother has a cherokee or a Liberty, so no more flashing the headlights at each other, or sticking your hand out to wave at each other when you pass by.

I mean its good because at least you know more people are using mac's now, which is great for those of you who want it to continue to grow and make great products... But at the same time it sucks because you aren't special anymore ;)

Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you people hold.

I wouldn't say "you people" since not every Mac user thinks that way. I mean, its just a computer, albeit a considerably more expensive one, that does pretty much the same thing a Windows PC does. It's just a little different in some ways.

I wouldn't say "you people" since not every Mac user thinks that way. I mean, its just a computer, albeit a considerably more expensive one, that does pretty much the same thing a Windows PC does. It's just a little different in some ways.

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

Oh I wasn't offended, and I don't see how people could perceive your statement as offensive. I was just quoting that part to help make my point - that some Mac users just see it as another kind of computer, and nothing to be elitist about. :)

Why does nobody remember this, Pre OS X MacOS sucked, and so did early OS X.

Maybe because a 9500/200 running 9.1 was the only computer at the time that could two streams of uncompressed 720x480 video at the same time (utilizing an 18GB SCSI-2 ARRAY for $4k).

Ahh THANK YOU! Now that's something worth missing. DOS... the best gaming platform ever made. Of course, it's a coincidence that the 90's were also the era of the best PC Games ever. Today it's just clone after clone after clone.

Ah, yes, the endless editions of Config.sys and autoexec.bat because some games required extended memory and other required expanded memory.

The hours passed trying to move the TSRs out of the conventional memory elsewhere to milk the last bytes of the 640KB limit to make the game start.

And for each and every single of the games, the little prayer Port 220, IRQ 5, DMA 1 to have the Sound Blaster recognized and you could not get your friend to help because he had a Gravis ultrasound ....

Three hours spend dealing in the arcane of himem.sys and emm386.exe before playing ....

SET SARCASM=Off

The games might have been good (I have very fond memories of Origin Systems Game) but DOS was like whipping yourself with a leather belt

1996? You mean the years we use to have macs in the library in high school and they use to crash once every 5 mins and would always have to be restarted.

The Mac OS was just about as bad as windows 98 before OSX.

Hey, Windows 98 was awesome.

Try using Windows ME. I unfortunately ran Windows ME.

Ah, yes, the endless editions of Config.sys and autoexec.bat because some games required extended memory and other required expanded memory.

The hours passed trying to move the TSRs out of the conventional memory elsewhere to milk the last bytes of the 640KB limit to make the game start.

And for each and every single of the games, the little prayer Port 220, IRQ 5, DMA 1 to have the Sound Blaster recognized and you could not get your friend to help because he had a Gravis ultrasound ....

Three hours spend dealing in the arcane of himem.sys and emm386.exe before playing ....

SET SARCASM=Off

The games might have been good (I have very fond memories of Origin Systems Game) but DOS was like whipping yourself with a leather belt

Wow, I remember it taking 5 hours to get Commanche to run on my 486DX. Good times. That is when building a PC took skill.

It's no different than the acknowledgement that you get from the guy using the machine you want at the gym,

or the other guy stopped in a BMW at the traffic light.

While it might be the first time you've noticed it's got nothing on, the sense of community you encounter

from photographers, and that has nothing on what you get when you ride a motorcycle.

My computer choice never made me a unique snowflake so, not only do I not miss it, I'm glad for other people

because it means that more people are using 'better' computers and having the same experience I do.

If you really think owning a mac is better, why wouldn't you want everyone to experience that? I don't

subscribe to the idea that others have to be unhappy or less productive for me to be successful, happy, etc.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

It was kinda elitist. And I was a stereotype in flesh. But I kinda miss it. -- Don't get me wrong, though. I still love my Mac.

and that's the kind of stupid, smug attitude that is associated with apple users. thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!