Does Anyone Else Miss the Good Ol' Days of Mac?


Recommended Posts

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer"

People with Smart cars do that too =/

Hey, I own 3 Macs, and i'm proud to own them.

I've never been a Mac owner, let alone liking Macs.

Since they became "Real pcs" (Reads: has an Intel cpu), I've come to like them as an innovative computer, very reliable, stylish, fast and quite easy to use.

I'd never trade my main pc in for a Mac, but that doesn't stop me liking the new Macs.

(Side note: 2 of my 3 macs run on Windows alone, so no flaming :p)

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

On a somewhat related note, I remember wearing Euro metal band shirts ten years ago - when they were impossible to find and needed to be imported. On occasion, somebody would come up to me and give me a smile or an approving nod. It was a nice ego boost; but times change and those shirts are now available in Hot Topic. I got over my musical elitism and began to embrace mainstream homogenization of something that once made me unique.

Posted from my MacBook Pro :)

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

On a somewhat related note, I remember wearing Euro metal band shirts ten years ago - when they were impossible to find and needed to be imported. On occasion, somebody would come up to me and give me a smile or an approving nod. It was a nice ego boost; but times change and those shirts are now available in Hot Topic. I got over my musical elitism and began to embrace mainstream homogenization of something that once made me unique.

Posted from my MacBook Pro :)

You obviusly should have stopped listening to the music you lighten and found another suitably crap music genre noone else lsiten to just so you could continue being a musical elitist, damn sellout :p

the unique-ness is going away because...more and more people are owning Macs.

I don't see a problem...unless you like being Elitist.

I'm happy to see more Macs out there....and the switch to Intel has made a drastic change in the market gains.

The Mac was a "better computer" in the old days? I assume you mean pre-OS X times? Yes...I, too, loved those extension conflicts and an OS with the multitasking performance of Windows 3.1. Truly an enlightened platform. Granted, the early days of OS X were arguably worse.

...

Why does nobody remember this, Pre OS X MacOS sucked, and so did early OS X.

I am very glad that Apple switched to Intel Processors because now is where they can really get the quality standard that for years Apple never meet, for example in the G4 era, it was so common to see how these computer die or have defect in the motherboard. Now Apple have a more superior support from Intel to design high quality products, I believe Apple today have a more better stand than anytime in the past.

You obviusly should have stopped listening to the music you lighten and found another suitably crap music genre noone else lsiten to just so you could continue being a musical elitist, damn sellout :p

I'm listening to nothing but Miley Cyrus and The Jonas Brothers these days. It's the ultimate act of ironic rebellion.

If it weren't for Apple switching to x86 processors, there would be no way in hell I'd consider an Apple machine. Being stuck with OS X and the few odd *nix distros compiled for PPC is not an option.

Now, why not? Just a matter of waiting until ... this laptop's due for a replacement.

Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you people hold.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

And people would be like wow, you use a Mac? What's it like. (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, Mac fanatic.) I'd tell them all about the G4 (Subsequently, the G5) processor, and the megahertz myth. (Some of you will know what I'm talking about right off the bat, I'm sure. We're the people who freaked out about the Cube. ;) )

As a owner of multiple Macintosh systems over the years, including a very expensive 1.467 GHz G4 system, I'm pretty sure there is no MHz myth. Well, there was a misconception regarding Apple's hyping of the G4 chip. The first home PC super-computer is what they called it I belive. Capable of doing like a billion whatever-the-hecks-a-second or something.

But how did that translate into real-world apps? Photoshop benchmarks are nice. But do most Mac users just sit at their desk using that all day?

If something is optimized for G4/AltiVec, then it's pretty quick. However, for MOST of the stuff I've ran, that isn't the case.

A lot of what I've tried to run is x86 ports of stuff. PowerPC-compatible games, Flash, and other stuff just runs so freaking slow.

Games and apps that played fine on a Pentium 3 would be be a slideshow on my 1.467 GHz G4.

Obviously, that is the fault of the programmer. But something like Firefox and Flash gets used almost daily by me, and knowing that my "faster" and certainly more expensive Mac gets its butt handed to it by an old "throw-away" P3 system is sad.

And a big issue now: Even Apple has abandoned PowerPC. Hardly any companies optimized for G4 before, and the chance of that happening now is even less.

a mac pc is one of the olderst pc's that i've ever used in my life...

they were pretty good, which has lots of multimedia features (for an old pc about a decade ago).

quite a simple interface, most things were straight forward. :)

performance was fine, not too slow, but it hangs after using quite sometime.

overall, it was a good experience with it.

1996? You mean the years we use to have macs in the library in high school and they use to crash once every 5 mins and would always have to be restarted.

The Mac OS was just about as bad as windows 98 before OSX.

I miss the good ol' days of DOS and the games that were made in the 90's...

Ahh THANK YOU! Now that's something worth missing. DOS... the best gaming platform ever made. Of course, it's a coincidence that the 90's were also the era of the best PC Games ever. Today it's just clone after clone after clone.

And, yes, when most people think about Macs of the 90's they think of the System Bomb "An error has occurred... restart" screens and that's about it. Paying more for a computer that crashed constantly is no reason to feel special.

you know I know exactly what you are talking about, I mean there are alot of things that people own that are like that, like owning a JEEP used to be, now everyone and there brother has a cherokee or a Liberty, so no more flashing the headlights at each other, or sticking your hand out to wave at each other when you pass by.

I mean its good because at least you know more people are using mac's now, which is great for those of you who want it to continue to grow and make great products... But at the same time it sucks because you aren't special anymore ;)

Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you people hold.

I wouldn't say "you people" since not every Mac user thinks that way. I mean, its just a computer, albeit a considerably more expensive one, that does pretty much the same thing a Windows PC does. It's just a little different in some ways.

I wouldn't say "you people" since not every Mac user thinks that way. I mean, its just a computer, albeit a considerably more expensive one, that does pretty much the same thing a Windows PC does. It's just a little different in some ways.

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

Oh I wasn't offended, and I don't see how people could perceive your statement as offensive. I was just quoting that part to help make my point - that some Mac users just see it as another kind of computer, and nothing to be elitist about. :)

Why does nobody remember this, Pre OS X MacOS sucked, and so did early OS X.

Maybe because a 9500/200 running 9.1 was the only computer at the time that could two streams of uncompressed 720x480 video at the same time (utilizing an 18GB SCSI-2 ARRAY for $4k).

Ahh THANK YOU! Now that's something worth missing. DOS... the best gaming platform ever made. Of course, it's a coincidence that the 90's were also the era of the best PC Games ever. Today it's just clone after clone after clone.

Ah, yes, the endless editions of Config.sys and autoexec.bat because some games required extended memory and other required expanded memory.

The hours passed trying to move the TSRs out of the conventional memory elsewhere to milk the last bytes of the 640KB limit to make the game start.

And for each and every single of the games, the little prayer Port 220, IRQ 5, DMA 1 to have the Sound Blaster recognized and you could not get your friend to help because he had a Gravis ultrasound ....

Three hours spend dealing in the arcane of himem.sys and emm386.exe before playing ....

SET SARCASM=Off

The games might have been good (I have very fond memories of Origin Systems Game) but DOS was like whipping yourself with a leather belt

1996? You mean the years we use to have macs in the library in high school and they use to crash once every 5 mins and would always have to be restarted.

The Mac OS was just about as bad as windows 98 before OSX.

Hey, Windows 98 was awesome.

Try using Windows ME. I unfortunately ran Windows ME.

Ah, yes, the endless editions of Config.sys and autoexec.bat because some games required extended memory and other required expanded memory.

The hours passed trying to move the TSRs out of the conventional memory elsewhere to milk the last bytes of the 640KB limit to make the game start.

And for each and every single of the games, the little prayer Port 220, IRQ 5, DMA 1 to have the Sound Blaster recognized and you could not get your friend to help because he had a Gravis ultrasound ....

Three hours spend dealing in the arcane of himem.sys and emm386.exe before playing ....

SET SARCASM=Off

The games might have been good (I have very fond memories of Origin Systems Game) but DOS was like whipping yourself with a leather belt

Wow, I remember it taking 5 hours to get Commanche to run on my 486DX. Good times. That is when building a PC took skill.

It's no different than the acknowledgement that you get from the guy using the machine you want at the gym,

or the other guy stopped in a BMW at the traffic light.

While it might be the first time you've noticed it's got nothing on, the sense of community you encounter

from photographers, and that has nothing on what you get when you ride a motorcycle.

My computer choice never made me a unique snowflake so, not only do I not miss it, I'm glad for other people

because it means that more people are using 'better' computers and having the same experience I do.

If you really think owning a mac is better, why wouldn't you want everyone to experience that? I don't

subscribe to the idea that others have to be unhappy or less productive for me to be successful, happy, etc.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

It was kinda elitist. And I was a stereotype in flesh. But I kinda miss it. -- Don't get me wrong, though. I still love my Mac.

and that's the kind of stupid, smug attitude that is associated with apple users. thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!