Does Anyone Else Miss the Good Ol' Days of Mac?


Recommended Posts

I have bin a Mac and Pc user and If you want to feel special again run Apples OS on "non Apple Hardware" and you will get the same looks of WoW. Apple has to set the Bar High to were people feel that they paid for the best and not have paid for the best looking.

Yeah, I've never owned a Mac but most people used to be so smug about their Apple computers and they used to think so highly of themselves when they would show any Apple product in class. Not anymore though and I'm pretty glad to be honest, lol.
I stopped reading right there....and i cant be bothered with a retort i will probably get a warning for.
Sometimes you just need to stand back and see how absurd you sound - for everyone talking about Macs as if they were something special and only certain people "deserve" to use them.

Macs are machines, built by Apple. They are one type of computer, among many. The people who use computers built by Apple are similar to the ones who use computers built by Dell, or HP. People who use Dell computers or HP computers can also use Apple computers, and vice versa. You are not a god because you use an Apple-built machine. You have not somehow elevated yourself above other people, who may use Windows or Linux. There is no Apple Fairy who goes around with her magic wand, bestowing the blessings of Apple to the deserving few.

If your choice of personal computer means so much to your perceived self, then maybe it is time to examine your priorities in life.

All QFTs.

Hey, Windows 98 was awesome.

Try using Windows ME. I unfortunately ran Windows ME.

Beats Windows 98 for me. That was an epic fail disaster. Windows 98 SE was another issue, but ME worked as well as 98 SE for me back in the PIII days. I don't see what's the hype with it with people using incompatible drivers and installing it on Pentium classics. In fact I used to run it on a VM on my Core 2 laptop without problems.

Of course I'm saying this in an Apple section, I'm prepared to be flamed.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own an ENIAC. It used to be that I'd be sitting infront of my office building on the side of the street and if I saw another ENIAC user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

And people would be like wow, you use an ENIAC? What the **** is that? (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, ENIAC fanatic, Colossus is better!!!!) I'd tell them all about the vacuum tubes, and the punchcard myth. (Some of you will know what I'm talking about right off the bat, I'm sure. We're the people who freaked out about the UNIVAC. ;) )

But now so many more people use ENIACS. And they use transistors, powerful, but nothing special. The mystique is kinda gone.

It was kinda elitist. And I was a stereotype in flesh. But I kinda miss it. -- Don't get me wrong, though. I still love my ENIAC.

Anyone else feel the same way?

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

I refuse to accept your apology.

:'(

:p

No. A computer is just a tool, nothing more.

I had quite a machine to be elitist and brag: Powermac G5 dual 2.0ghz and 8GB RAM but in the end its just a tool, a powerful one but a tool is nothing if not used well.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

So you are feeling unfortunate due to Apple's immense success with the newer Macs? That's kinda sad...

And people would be like wow, you use a Mac? What's it like. (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, Mac fanatic.) I'd tell them all about the G4 (Subsequently, the G5) processor, and the megahertz myth.

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. IBM should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass; aside from the Xbox's Xenon CPU. Apple moving from the PowerPC CPUs to the Intel CPUs was their greatest decision IMO.

Edited by Skulltrail
So you are feeling unfortunate due to Apple's immense success with the newer Macs? That's kinda sad...

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. Motorola should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass.

The G procs are (still) by IBM.

This is hilarious.

You don't feel special? or are you using some other OS on your Mac rather than OS X?

Better yet, why not install Windows (any version will do) and then realize why you chose a Mac in the first place.

Moving right along . . .

:rolleyes:

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Remind me when being unique in OS selection was more important than choosing the right platform to get what you want done. :rolleyes:

*And what do you imply by 'any version,' as if in your world Vista is as **** poor as XP and below :rolleyes:

edit: Good post there Relativity_17. (Y)

I stopped reading right there....and i cant be bothered with a retort i will probably get a warning for.

Heh...heh heh (chuckle). I see ya point there.

It used to be that Macs were better, but things have changed. Any "PC" can beat a Mac with the right hardware and Apple's ego is finally getting shoved back in thier face. Anyone who's smart will save themselves $5000 and build a PC with Intel/Nvidia hardware and just install OS X on it if they really need a Mac...

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Remind me when being unique in OS selection was more important than choosing the right platform to get what you want done. :rolleyes:

*And what do you imply by 'any version,' as if in your world Vista is as **** poor as XP and below :rolleyes:

edit: Good post there Relativity_17. (Y)

Erm, I don't know if you're pointing those comments at me or what. But I didn't say it was bad, I said I just don't understand the appeal. I didn't say XP or Vista is better. In -my- experience, I like my windows xp better. Using Adobe Illustrator CS3 at school, and here at home, it just works better for -me-. This may surprise some, but Illustrator runs smoother at home for me than it does on the Mac, it hasn't crashed once here at my house, but just about every class Illustrator has crashed for me on the Mac.

So yeah, my experience on Mac hasn't been that great, but I'm not saying it's bad.

Oh, and, I don't care about hardware, that to me is a non-issue. If the end result is that I see a picture on my screen then I don't really care what hardware is used to display it.

Erm, I don't know if you're pointing those comments at me or what. But I didn't say it was bad, I said I just don't understand the appeal. I didn't say XP or Vista is better. In -my- experience, I like my windows xp better. Using Adobe Illustrator CS3 at school, and here at home, it just works better for -me-. This may surprise some, but Illustrator runs smoother at home for me than it does on the Mac, it hasn't crashed once here at my house, but just about every class Illustrator has crashed for me on the Mac.

So yeah, my experience on Mac hasn't been that great, but I'm not saying it's bad.

Oh, and, I don't care about hardware, that to me is a non-issue. If the end result is that I see a picture on my screen then I don't really care what hardware is used to display it.

I aimed the post at LTD, you posted a bit before me. So much for not using the quote button. Sorry :pinch:

As for this post: I can understand your point of view, but school Macs aren't an ideal target for benchmarking experience with Apple machines. :p For instance, the G4 eMacs I worked with back in grade 11 drove me nuts: Office X was a bit clunky, iMovie had this incredibly stupid bug that sped up imported camcorder video (so our movie editing projects sounded like chipmunks :rofl:), the machines occasionally required a hard reboot, etc. Also, as a class with almost all of them fulltime Windows users, we weren't used to having floating toolbars and document windows. So in Photoshop, we frequently lost focus of our images by clicking behind the active document. :pinch: BTW the systems were running Jaguar or Panther.

But then again, the school had old P2 systems with Windows XP.... they were *slow.* Thankfully the era of crappy school computers is behind me now. :laugh:

Edited by rm20010

For a little while I got in to the looks of my case. Not the Apple style though, that stuff always looked like...uh...(gotta be nice)...sissy stuff to me. Not some serious great looking modded systems. Modding was a phase, I don't care about all that now. I am meticulous about neat wiring, that comes from years of electronics and control system wiring. I have an old In Win full tower that is built like a tank and is the good ole beige. I've had it for years, the other cases have come and gone. Once I get the system built, I don't need to hardly ever touch it except for a cleaning once in a while and that may be a thing of the past. I've gone silent with water cooling. My radiator with fans and the pump are remotely located. The case is insulated for sound so I don't hear the quiet Seagate hard drives. What I'm working on now is giving the case a positive air pressure using filtered air so no dust will enter the case. My friends think I'm crazy because I'll be using a K&N filter to clean up the air going in the case. That gets me back in touch with my old gearhead days. :)

As far as OS's, I can run Win, Linux or OSX on my AMD based system. Did the OSX thing just to try it, didn't see what the big deal is. Cutesy just doesn't do anything for me, except in my woman. I like a utilitarian desktop.

I aimed the post at LTD, you posted a bit before me. So much for not using the quote button. Sorry :pinch:

As for this post: I can understand your point of view, but school Macs aren't an ideal target for benchmarking experience with Apple machines. :p For instance, the G4 eMacs I worked with back in grade 11 drove me nuts: Office X was a bit clunky, iMovie had this incredibly stupid bug that sped up imported camcorder video (so our movie editing projects sounded like chipmunks :rofl:), the machines occasionally required a hard reboot, etc. Also, as a class with almost all of them fulltime Windows users, we weren't used to having floating toolbars and document windows. So in Photoshop, we frequently lost focus of our images by clicking behind the active document. :pinch: BTW the systems were running Jaguar or Panther.

But then again, the school had old P2 systems with Windows XP.... they were *slow.* Thankfully the era of crappy school computers is behind me now. :laugh:

As far as I know the Macs in my schools lab are all brand new as of two and a half weeks ago, I don't know what exactly their specs are. So it's not like the hardware is in any way outdated.

The hardest part of working on the Macs for me is the mouse, no right click. And the standard mouse that comes with Macs is just terrible. As far as the shape of the mouse goes anyways, I like the scroll ball.

Heh...heh heh (chuckle). I see ya point there.

It used to be that Macs were better, but things have changed. Any "PC" can beat a Mac with the right hardware and Apple's ego is finally getting shoved back in thier face. Anyone who's smart will save themselves $5000 and build a PC with Intel/Nvidia hardware and just install OS X on it if they really need a Mac...

I'm very curious as to what degree "Macs were better." I mean, how do you define "used to be?" Because for me, it "used to be" that Macs had to suffer with System 1-9, you know, the operating system that lacked things such as protected memory, true preemptive multi-tasking, etc. One of the biggest reasons Windows 3 became such a huge success was not only that it was available on the dominant hardware platform of the day, but that it also offered the things that simply weren't in the Mac OS.

Oddly enough, it really wasn't until Mac OS X that Mac users got the benefits of things such as protected memory. And if you consider that Mac OS X wasn't really a true Apple OS, that means that Apple was actually incapable of making their own OS that could compete with Windows.

...

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. IBM should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass; aside from the Xbox's Xenon CPU. Apple moving from the PowerPC CPUs to the Intel CPUs was their greatest decision IMO.

CELL's fairly good also.

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Without the OS, basically you're saying that a computer with an Intel processor, Corsair RAM, Seagate hard drive, ATI video card, etc makes it special? Except for the fact that it costs twice as much for the same off the shelf hardware, I don't see what's so special. :p

Well, I think it all really started in 1984. Computers were more of a hobby until IBM, and Apple promised a computer that would defeat the IBM PC, and offered the Macintosh, a revolution in computing at that time. Ever since, Apple fanboys such as myself :p lol jk, have had this sort of bond with the original ideals of the company. Through thick and thin. Now, it seems kind of silly to be devoted to a product brand, but thats the way it was. People were very loyal to Apple, and still are.

Without the OS, basically you're saying that a computer with an Intel processor, Corsair RAM, Seagate hard drive, ATI video card, etc makes it special? Except for the fact that it costs twice as much for the same off the shelf hardware, I don't see what's so special. :p

While typing that post I was thinking more about their laptops. ;) I've seen a few of them running non-OS X operating systems. And, to be honest, there's a good deal of people who crave electronics with slim profiles and good performance. So the Macbook (Pro)s fit the bill.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.
    • Decentralized search result anonymization...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!