Does Anyone Else Miss the Good Ol' Days of Mac?


Recommended Posts

I have bin a Mac and Pc user and If you want to feel special again run Apples OS on "non Apple Hardware" and you will get the same looks of WoW. Apple has to set the Bar High to were people feel that they paid for the best and not have paid for the best looking.

Yeah, I've never owned a Mac but most people used to be so smug about their Apple computers and they used to think so highly of themselves when they would show any Apple product in class. Not anymore though and I'm pretty glad to be honest, lol.
I stopped reading right there....and i cant be bothered with a retort i will probably get a warning for.
Sometimes you just need to stand back and see how absurd you sound - for everyone talking about Macs as if they were something special and only certain people "deserve" to use them.

Macs are machines, built by Apple. They are one type of computer, among many. The people who use computers built by Apple are similar to the ones who use computers built by Dell, or HP. People who use Dell computers or HP computers can also use Apple computers, and vice versa. You are not a god because you use an Apple-built machine. You have not somehow elevated yourself above other people, who may use Windows or Linux. There is no Apple Fairy who goes around with her magic wand, bestowing the blessings of Apple to the deserving few.

If your choice of personal computer means so much to your perceived self, then maybe it is time to examine your priorities in life.

All QFTs.

Hey, Windows 98 was awesome.

Try using Windows ME. I unfortunately ran Windows ME.

Beats Windows 98 for me. That was an epic fail disaster. Windows 98 SE was another issue, but ME worked as well as 98 SE for me back in the PIII days. I don't see what's the hype with it with people using incompatible drivers and installing it on Pentium classics. In fact I used to run it on a VM on my Core 2 laptop without problems.

Of course I'm saying this in an Apple section, I'm prepared to be flamed.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own an ENIAC. It used to be that I'd be sitting infront of my office building on the side of the street and if I saw another ENIAC user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

And people would be like wow, you use an ENIAC? What the **** is that? (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, ENIAC fanatic, Colossus is better!!!!) I'd tell them all about the vacuum tubes, and the punchcard myth. (Some of you will know what I'm talking about right off the bat, I'm sure. We're the people who freaked out about the UNIVAC. ;) )

But now so many more people use ENIACS. And they use transistors, powerful, but nothing special. The mystique is kinda gone.

It was kinda elitist. And I was a stereotype in flesh. But I kinda miss it. -- Don't get me wrong, though. I still love my ENIAC.

Anyone else feel the same way?

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

I refuse to accept your apology.

:'(

:p

No. A computer is just a tool, nothing more.

I had quite a machine to be elitist and brag: Powermac G5 dual 2.0ghz and 8GB RAM but in the end its just a tool, a powerful one but a tool is nothing if not used well.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

So you are feeling unfortunate due to Apple's immense success with the newer Macs? That's kinda sad...

And people would be like wow, you use a Mac? What's it like. (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, Mac fanatic.) I'd tell them all about the G4 (Subsequently, the G5) processor, and the megahertz myth.

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. IBM should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass; aside from the Xbox's Xenon CPU. Apple moving from the PowerPC CPUs to the Intel CPUs was their greatest decision IMO.

Edited by Skulltrail
So you are feeling unfortunate due to Apple's immense success with the newer Macs? That's kinda sad...

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. Motorola should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass.

The G procs are (still) by IBM.

This is hilarious.

You don't feel special? or are you using some other OS on your Mac rather than OS X?

Better yet, why not install Windows (any version will do) and then realize why you chose a Mac in the first place.

Moving right along . . .

:rolleyes:

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Remind me when being unique in OS selection was more important than choosing the right platform to get what you want done. :rolleyes:

*And what do you imply by 'any version,' as if in your world Vista is as **** poor as XP and below :rolleyes:

edit: Good post there Relativity_17. (Y)

I stopped reading right there....and i cant be bothered with a retort i will probably get a warning for.

Heh...heh heh (chuckle). I see ya point there.

It used to be that Macs were better, but things have changed. Any "PC" can beat a Mac with the right hardware and Apple's ego is finally getting shoved back in thier face. Anyone who's smart will save themselves $5000 and build a PC with Intel/Nvidia hardware and just install OS X on it if they really need a Mac...

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Remind me when being unique in OS selection was more important than choosing the right platform to get what you want done. :rolleyes:

*And what do you imply by 'any version,' as if in your world Vista is as **** poor as XP and below :rolleyes:

edit: Good post there Relativity_17. (Y)

Erm, I don't know if you're pointing those comments at me or what. But I didn't say it was bad, I said I just don't understand the appeal. I didn't say XP or Vista is better. In -my- experience, I like my windows xp better. Using Adobe Illustrator CS3 at school, and here at home, it just works better for -me-. This may surprise some, but Illustrator runs smoother at home for me than it does on the Mac, it hasn't crashed once here at my house, but just about every class Illustrator has crashed for me on the Mac.

So yeah, my experience on Mac hasn't been that great, but I'm not saying it's bad.

Oh, and, I don't care about hardware, that to me is a non-issue. If the end result is that I see a picture on my screen then I don't really care what hardware is used to display it.

Erm, I don't know if you're pointing those comments at me or what. But I didn't say it was bad, I said I just don't understand the appeal. I didn't say XP or Vista is better. In -my- experience, I like my windows xp better. Using Adobe Illustrator CS3 at school, and here at home, it just works better for -me-. This may surprise some, but Illustrator runs smoother at home for me than it does on the Mac, it hasn't crashed once here at my house, but just about every class Illustrator has crashed for me on the Mac.

So yeah, my experience on Mac hasn't been that great, but I'm not saying it's bad.

Oh, and, I don't care about hardware, that to me is a non-issue. If the end result is that I see a picture on my screen then I don't really care what hardware is used to display it.

I aimed the post at LTD, you posted a bit before me. So much for not using the quote button. Sorry :pinch:

As for this post: I can understand your point of view, but school Macs aren't an ideal target for benchmarking experience with Apple machines. :p For instance, the G4 eMacs I worked with back in grade 11 drove me nuts: Office X was a bit clunky, iMovie had this incredibly stupid bug that sped up imported camcorder video (so our movie editing projects sounded like chipmunks :rofl:), the machines occasionally required a hard reboot, etc. Also, as a class with almost all of them fulltime Windows users, we weren't used to having floating toolbars and document windows. So in Photoshop, we frequently lost focus of our images by clicking behind the active document. :pinch: BTW the systems were running Jaguar or Panther.

But then again, the school had old P2 systems with Windows XP.... they were *slow.* Thankfully the era of crappy school computers is behind me now. :laugh:

Edited by rm20010

For a little while I got in to the looks of my case. Not the Apple style though, that stuff always looked like...uh...(gotta be nice)...sissy stuff to me. Not some serious great looking modded systems. Modding was a phase, I don't care about all that now. I am meticulous about neat wiring, that comes from years of electronics and control system wiring. I have an old In Win full tower that is built like a tank and is the good ole beige. I've had it for years, the other cases have come and gone. Once I get the system built, I don't need to hardly ever touch it except for a cleaning once in a while and that may be a thing of the past. I've gone silent with water cooling. My radiator with fans and the pump are remotely located. The case is insulated for sound so I don't hear the quiet Seagate hard drives. What I'm working on now is giving the case a positive air pressure using filtered air so no dust will enter the case. My friends think I'm crazy because I'll be using a K&N filter to clean up the air going in the case. That gets me back in touch with my old gearhead days. :)

As far as OS's, I can run Win, Linux or OSX on my AMD based system. Did the OSX thing just to try it, didn't see what the big deal is. Cutesy just doesn't do anything for me, except in my woman. I like a utilitarian desktop.

I aimed the post at LTD, you posted a bit before me. So much for not using the quote button. Sorry :pinch:

As for this post: I can understand your point of view, but school Macs aren't an ideal target for benchmarking experience with Apple machines. :p For instance, the G4 eMacs I worked with back in grade 11 drove me nuts: Office X was a bit clunky, iMovie had this incredibly stupid bug that sped up imported camcorder video (so our movie editing projects sounded like chipmunks :rofl:), the machines occasionally required a hard reboot, etc. Also, as a class with almost all of them fulltime Windows users, we weren't used to having floating toolbars and document windows. So in Photoshop, we frequently lost focus of our images by clicking behind the active document. :pinch: BTW the systems were running Jaguar or Panther.

But then again, the school had old P2 systems with Windows XP.... they were *slow.* Thankfully the era of crappy school computers is behind me now. :laugh:

As far as I know the Macs in my schools lab are all brand new as of two and a half weeks ago, I don't know what exactly their specs are. So it's not like the hardware is in any way outdated.

The hardest part of working on the Macs for me is the mouse, no right click. And the standard mouse that comes with Macs is just terrible. As far as the shape of the mouse goes anyways, I like the scroll ball.

Heh...heh heh (chuckle). I see ya point there.

It used to be that Macs were better, but things have changed. Any "PC" can beat a Mac with the right hardware and Apple's ego is finally getting shoved back in thier face. Anyone who's smart will save themselves $5000 and build a PC with Intel/Nvidia hardware and just install OS X on it if they really need a Mac...

I'm very curious as to what degree "Macs were better." I mean, how do you define "used to be?" Because for me, it "used to be" that Macs had to suffer with System 1-9, you know, the operating system that lacked things such as protected memory, true preemptive multi-tasking, etc. One of the biggest reasons Windows 3 became such a huge success was not only that it was available on the dominant hardware platform of the day, but that it also offered the things that simply weren't in the Mac OS.

Oddly enough, it really wasn't until Mac OS X that Mac users got the benefits of things such as protected memory. And if you consider that Mac OS X wasn't really a true Apple OS, that means that Apple was actually incapable of making their own OS that could compete with Windows.

...

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. IBM should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass; aside from the Xbox's Xenon CPU. Apple moving from the PowerPC CPUs to the Intel CPUs was their greatest decision IMO.

CELL's fairly good also.

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Without the OS, basically you're saying that a computer with an Intel processor, Corsair RAM, Seagate hard drive, ATI video card, etc makes it special? Except for the fact that it costs twice as much for the same off the shelf hardware, I don't see what's so special. :p

Well, I think it all really started in 1984. Computers were more of a hobby until IBM, and Apple promised a computer that would defeat the IBM PC, and offered the Macintosh, a revolution in computing at that time. Ever since, Apple fanboys such as myself :p lol jk, have had this sort of bond with the original ideals of the company. Through thick and thin. Now, it seems kind of silly to be devoted to a product brand, but thats the way it was. People were very loyal to Apple, and still are.

Without the OS, basically you're saying that a computer with an Intel processor, Corsair RAM, Seagate hard drive, ATI video card, etc makes it special? Except for the fact that it costs twice as much for the same off the shelf hardware, I don't see what's so special. :p

While typing that post I was thinking more about their laptops. ;) I've seen a few of them running non-OS X operating systems. And, to be honest, there's a good deal of people who crave electronics with slim profiles and good performance. So the Macbook (Pro)s fit the bill.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
    • Sparkle 2.20.1 by Razvan Serea Sparkle is a free, open-source Windows optimization tool designed to make your PC faster, cleaner, and more private. With Sparkle, you can easily debloat Windows by removing unnecessary apps and services, disable Microsoft tracking to enhance privacy, and apply performance tweaks to boost speed. Its cleaner removes junk and temporary files, while every change is safe and fully reversible. Sparkle also features a modern, user-friendly interface with automatic updates, making system maintenance simple. Explore over 39 tweaks, from disabling telemetry and hibernation to optimizing network and game settings, all aimed at customizing and enhancing your Windows experience. Sparkle supports Windows 10 and 11. Sparkle 2.20.1 changelog: You can now change the Animation Direction from Up, Left, or Off. Added configurable animation direction (Up, Left, Off) for improved accessibility Added TTL caching to the system info backend Refactored tweak application flow to await NvidiaProfileInspector Improved IPC listener cleanup to correctly remove specific listeners Fixed online status not updating after successful network requests Updated system info tests to support backend caching Removed electron-toolkit utils dependency in favor of internal is.dev helper Fixed unwanted files and folders being included in application bundles Download: Sparkle 2.20.1 | Portable | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Sparkle Website | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Never used the G7 Pro, but I've never had a good experience with that style of d-pad and fighting games.
    • And I just bought a seat cushion for my mesh chair. The chair feels nice but the first time I sat in it with boxers, I realized I don't like the feel of mesh on my legs. 😂
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      250
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!