Does Anyone Else Miss the Good Ol' Days of Mac?


Recommended Posts

I have bin a Mac and Pc user and If you want to feel special again run Apples OS on "non Apple Hardware" and you will get the same looks of WoW. Apple has to set the Bar High to were people feel that they paid for the best and not have paid for the best looking.

Yeah, I've never owned a Mac but most people used to be so smug about their Apple computers and they used to think so highly of themselves when they would show any Apple product in class. Not anymore though and I'm pretty glad to be honest, lol.
I stopped reading right there....and i cant be bothered with a retort i will probably get a warning for.
Sometimes you just need to stand back and see how absurd you sound - for everyone talking about Macs as if they were something special and only certain people "deserve" to use them.

Macs are machines, built by Apple. They are one type of computer, among many. The people who use computers built by Apple are similar to the ones who use computers built by Dell, or HP. People who use Dell computers or HP computers can also use Apple computers, and vice versa. You are not a god because you use an Apple-built machine. You have not somehow elevated yourself above other people, who may use Windows or Linux. There is no Apple Fairy who goes around with her magic wand, bestowing the blessings of Apple to the deserving few.

If your choice of personal computer means so much to your perceived self, then maybe it is time to examine your priorities in life.

All QFTs.

Hey, Windows 98 was awesome.

Try using Windows ME. I unfortunately ran Windows ME.

Beats Windows 98 for me. That was an epic fail disaster. Windows 98 SE was another issue, but ME worked as well as 98 SE for me back in the PIII days. I don't see what's the hype with it with people using incompatible drivers and installing it on Pentium classics. In fact I used to run it on a VM on my Core 2 laptop without problems.

Of course I'm saying this in an Apple section, I'm prepared to be flamed.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own an ENIAC. It used to be that I'd be sitting infront of my office building on the side of the street and if I saw another ENIAC user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

And people would be like wow, you use an ENIAC? What the **** is that? (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, ENIAC fanatic, Colossus is better!!!!) I'd tell them all about the vacuum tubes, and the punchcard myth. (Some of you will know what I'm talking about right off the bat, I'm sure. We're the people who freaked out about the UNIVAC. ;) )

But now so many more people use ENIACS. And they use transistors, powerful, but nothing special. The mystique is kinda gone.

It was kinda elitist. And I was a stereotype in flesh. But I kinda miss it. -- Don't get me wrong, though. I still love my ENIAC.

Anyone else feel the same way?

"You people" was aimed at people who thought that way. Hence I didn't write "Also :rofl: at this perceived elitism you Mac users people hold." If any Mac users who do not share that mindset got offended by that, I am sorry. :)

I refuse to accept your apology.

:'(

:p

No. A computer is just a tool, nothing more.

I had quite a machine to be elitist and brag: Powermac G5 dual 2.0ghz and 8GB RAM but in the end its just a tool, a powerful one but a tool is nothing if not used well.

It doesn't feel as special anymore to own a Mac. It used to be that I'd be sitting in an airport terminal or coffee shop, or on the side of the street. And if I saw another Mac user we'd silently acknowledge each other. Maybe a nod, or smile, knowing we used a "better computer" :p .

So you are feeling unfortunate due to Apple's immense success with the newer Macs? That's kinda sad...

And people would be like wow, you use a Mac? What's it like. (Or. EW, you use a WHAT? Get away from me, Mac fanatic.) I'd tell them all about the G4 (Subsequently, the G5) processor, and the megahertz myth.

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. IBM should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass; aside from the Xbox's Xenon CPU. Apple moving from the PowerPC CPUs to the Intel CPUs was their greatest decision IMO.

Edited by Skulltrail
So you are feeling unfortunate due to Apple's immense success with the newer Macs? That's kinda sad...

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. Motorola should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass.

The G procs are (still) by IBM.

This is hilarious.

You don't feel special? or are you using some other OS on your Mac rather than OS X?

Better yet, why not install Windows (any version will do) and then realize why you chose a Mac in the first place.

Moving right along . . .

:rolleyes:

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Remind me when being unique in OS selection was more important than choosing the right platform to get what you want done. :rolleyes:

*And what do you imply by 'any version,' as if in your world Vista is as **** poor as XP and below :rolleyes:

edit: Good post there Relativity_17. (Y)

I stopped reading right there....and i cant be bothered with a retort i will probably get a warning for.

Heh...heh heh (chuckle). I see ya point there.

It used to be that Macs were better, but things have changed. Any "PC" can beat a Mac with the right hardware and Apple's ego is finally getting shoved back in thier face. Anyone who's smart will save themselves $5000 and build a PC with Intel/Nvidia hardware and just install OS X on it if they really need a Mac...

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Remind me when being unique in OS selection was more important than choosing the right platform to get what you want done. :rolleyes:

*And what do you imply by 'any version,' as if in your world Vista is as **** poor as XP and below :rolleyes:

edit: Good post there Relativity_17. (Y)

Erm, I don't know if you're pointing those comments at me or what. But I didn't say it was bad, I said I just don't understand the appeal. I didn't say XP or Vista is better. In -my- experience, I like my windows xp better. Using Adobe Illustrator CS3 at school, and here at home, it just works better for -me-. This may surprise some, but Illustrator runs smoother at home for me than it does on the Mac, it hasn't crashed once here at my house, but just about every class Illustrator has crashed for me on the Mac.

So yeah, my experience on Mac hasn't been that great, but I'm not saying it's bad.

Oh, and, I don't care about hardware, that to me is a non-issue. If the end result is that I see a picture on my screen then I don't really care what hardware is used to display it.

Erm, I don't know if you're pointing those comments at me or what. But I didn't say it was bad, I said I just don't understand the appeal. I didn't say XP or Vista is better. In -my- experience, I like my windows xp better. Using Adobe Illustrator CS3 at school, and here at home, it just works better for -me-. This may surprise some, but Illustrator runs smoother at home for me than it does on the Mac, it hasn't crashed once here at my house, but just about every class Illustrator has crashed for me on the Mac.

So yeah, my experience on Mac hasn't been that great, but I'm not saying it's bad.

Oh, and, I don't care about hardware, that to me is a non-issue. If the end result is that I see a picture on my screen then I don't really care what hardware is used to display it.

I aimed the post at LTD, you posted a bit before me. So much for not using the quote button. Sorry :pinch:

As for this post: I can understand your point of view, but school Macs aren't an ideal target for benchmarking experience with Apple machines. :p For instance, the G4 eMacs I worked with back in grade 11 drove me nuts: Office X was a bit clunky, iMovie had this incredibly stupid bug that sped up imported camcorder video (so our movie editing projects sounded like chipmunks :rofl:), the machines occasionally required a hard reboot, etc. Also, as a class with almost all of them fulltime Windows users, we weren't used to having floating toolbars and document windows. So in Photoshop, we frequently lost focus of our images by clicking behind the active document. :pinch: BTW the systems were running Jaguar or Panther.

But then again, the school had old P2 systems with Windows XP.... they were *slow.* Thankfully the era of crappy school computers is behind me now. :laugh:

Edited by rm20010

For a little while I got in to the looks of my case. Not the Apple style though, that stuff always looked like...uh...(gotta be nice)...sissy stuff to me. Not some serious great looking modded systems. Modding was a phase, I don't care about all that now. I am meticulous about neat wiring, that comes from years of electronics and control system wiring. I have an old In Win full tower that is built like a tank and is the good ole beige. I've had it for years, the other cases have come and gone. Once I get the system built, I don't need to hardly ever touch it except for a cleaning once in a while and that may be a thing of the past. I've gone silent with water cooling. My radiator with fans and the pump are remotely located. The case is insulated for sound so I don't hear the quiet Seagate hard drives. What I'm working on now is giving the case a positive air pressure using filtered air so no dust will enter the case. My friends think I'm crazy because I'll be using a K&N filter to clean up the air going in the case. That gets me back in touch with my old gearhead days. :)

As far as OS's, I can run Win, Linux or OSX on my AMD based system. Did the OSX thing just to try it, didn't see what the big deal is. Cutesy just doesn't do anything for me, except in my woman. I like a utilitarian desktop.

I aimed the post at LTD, you posted a bit before me. So much for not using the quote button. Sorry :pinch:

As for this post: I can understand your point of view, but school Macs aren't an ideal target for benchmarking experience with Apple machines. :p For instance, the G4 eMacs I worked with back in grade 11 drove me nuts: Office X was a bit clunky, iMovie had this incredibly stupid bug that sped up imported camcorder video (so our movie editing projects sounded like chipmunks :rofl:), the machines occasionally required a hard reboot, etc. Also, as a class with almost all of them fulltime Windows users, we weren't used to having floating toolbars and document windows. So in Photoshop, we frequently lost focus of our images by clicking behind the active document. :pinch: BTW the systems were running Jaguar or Panther.

But then again, the school had old P2 systems with Windows XP.... they were *slow.* Thankfully the era of crappy school computers is behind me now. :laugh:

As far as I know the Macs in my schools lab are all brand new as of two and a half weeks ago, I don't know what exactly their specs are. So it's not like the hardware is in any way outdated.

The hardest part of working on the Macs for me is the mouse, no right click. And the standard mouse that comes with Macs is just terrible. As far as the shape of the mouse goes anyways, I like the scroll ball.

Heh...heh heh (chuckle). I see ya point there.

It used to be that Macs were better, but things have changed. Any "PC" can beat a Mac with the right hardware and Apple's ego is finally getting shoved back in thier face. Anyone who's smart will save themselves $5000 and build a PC with Intel/Nvidia hardware and just install OS X on it if they really need a Mac...

I'm very curious as to what degree "Macs were better." I mean, how do you define "used to be?" Because for me, it "used to be" that Macs had to suffer with System 1-9, you know, the operating system that lacked things such as protected memory, true preemptive multi-tasking, etc. One of the biggest reasons Windows 3 became such a huge success was not only that it was available on the dominant hardware platform of the day, but that it also offered the things that simply weren't in the Mac OS.

Oddly enough, it really wasn't until Mac OS X that Mac users got the benefits of things such as protected memory. And if you consider that Mac OS X wasn't really a true Apple OS, that means that Apple was actually incapable of making their own OS that could compete with Windows.

...

The Gx CPUs sucked ass. IBM should and is sticking to basic processors because their computer processors suck teh ass; aside from the Xbox's Xenon CPU. Apple moving from the PowerPC CPUs to the Intel CPUs was their greatest decision IMO.

CELL's fairly good also.

^^^ Excuse me?

Some people like the hardware of Macs, styling and design, quality in manufacturing, take your pick - but don't care for its operating system. Any problem with that? They should be ashamed of purchasing a Mac to run Windows Vista* or a flavour of Linux?

Without the OS, basically you're saying that a computer with an Intel processor, Corsair RAM, Seagate hard drive, ATI video card, etc makes it special? Except for the fact that it costs twice as much for the same off the shelf hardware, I don't see what's so special. :p

Well, I think it all really started in 1984. Computers were more of a hobby until IBM, and Apple promised a computer that would defeat the IBM PC, and offered the Macintosh, a revolution in computing at that time. Ever since, Apple fanboys such as myself :p lol jk, have had this sort of bond with the original ideals of the company. Through thick and thin. Now, it seems kind of silly to be devoted to a product brand, but thats the way it was. People were very loyal to Apple, and still are.

Without the OS, basically you're saying that a computer with an Intel processor, Corsair RAM, Seagate hard drive, ATI video card, etc makes it special? Except for the fact that it costs twice as much for the same off the shelf hardware, I don't see what's so special. :p

While typing that post I was thinking more about their laptops. ;) I've seen a few of them running non-OS X operating systems. And, to be honest, there's a good deal of people who crave electronics with slim profiles and good performance. So the Macbook (Pro)s fit the bill.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!