Cars set to get parental controls


Recommended Posts

Cars could soon come with parental controls that limit what younger drivers can do with a vehicle.

Developed by Ford, the MyKey system limits a car's top speed, how loud its stereo can be :huh: and sounds warnings if seatbelts are not being worn.

Ford will introduce the controls on some US makes of car that are due to debut in 2009 but go on sale in 2010.

The Ford Focus will be the first to have MyKey, but the car maker said it would become a standard feature.

The main element of the MyKey system is to limit the top speed of a car to 80mph.

Ford says other options allow parents to limit the volume on the car stereo and make the car sound a continuous alert if drivers and passengers are not wearing a seatbelt.

Other options will let parents decide if warning tones should sound if a car goes faster than 45, 55 or 65 mph.

The car giant said the system built on the ID chips it already used in car keys to hamper car theft.

"It's making use of existing technology, and through the magic of software, we're able to build features on top of the features we already have," sad Jim Buczkowski, Ford's director of electronic and electrical systems engineering.

Ford's compact version of the Focus, which is due to go on sale in 2010, will be the first to sport MyKey. But a spokesman said it would spread to all cars in the Ford, Lincoln and Mercury range as models are updated.

"Research we've done has shown that speeding is a major factor in teen crashes, especially novice teen drivers," Anne McCartt, senior vice president for research at the US Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, told the AP news agency.

"So I think a system that tries to correct the speeding behaviour has the potential to improve safety," she added.

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/679004-cars-set-to-get-parental-controls/
Share on other sites

I agree with it.

As long as it doesn't limit acceleration.

But, who the **** buys a new car for their kids first? They're either gonna crash it, and get more massive insurance premiums, or they're not, inc which case they could have saved money with a cheap POS van (which is what I'm getting) and not claiming on ins anyway, if they get a hole in the side. If I crash/dent my van, it's going to look very Mad-Max style when I'm done with it.

"I AM THE ROAD WARRIOR!"

Good idea. Definately.

I know how I used to treat my dads car when I passed my test.. and it's not like I was some loser kid - it's just something you have to get out of your system I think when you're a young man as you don't know what the limits are, and how far you can push it.

On the negative side, with this feature, kids may never get the 'scare' they need to make them drive a bit more responsibly. Mine was locking up the brakes trying to race a friend as we headed down towards a busy junction (no ABS on the car) - skidded what must have been like 50ft before stopping inches from the junction.. needless to say my driving style changed at that point.

i agree with it....

true it should be PART of the solution, like exercise as part of a controlled diet...

If you can afford to buy your kids nice things, then you will.......

not all parents think like that, but alot do....

thats why kids have the ps3 etc, its not really required, but you can afford it and your kids want it

If it drives down the cost of my car insurance im all for it, Ive never sped in a car since ive been driving and yet im still paying ?1000+ on my insurance

i agree with you man ... i like the idea but then again there are pros and cons ... actually i wish they had this when i was a teenager (about 8 years ago) so i could drive the car without being hassled by insurance and parents ... actually they should implement a breathalyzer test ... if you drank , no car for you ...

Parked at an intersection, suddenly the responsible teen sees a truck careening right at them. They stomp on the gas to move out of the way. "I'm sorry Dave, but I can't allow you to do that" says the car, right before the teen is killed in the collision.

Ok maybe I'm exaggerating just a bit but I hate BS like this. This sounds like something for people who suck as parents.

Right, because this will make things safer, riiiiight :rolleyes:

Why is it Ford though? Those who claim that it would be too expensive to build the Euro Focus for their home market in North America? These same guys are spending money which they don't have to make quality cars on technologies that won't make driving that much safer for teens.

Even the most well behaved teen will speed. I'm all for this system really

That's a pretty gross generalization that frankly, I take offence to. I remember being a teenager (not that long ago) and I didn't speed. I don't speed today either; I have no speeding fines because I don't speed.

That being said, I have to a stand against any system that limits driver control. I can understand things like ABS, ESC, and Powered Steering, because they improve driver control (for most drivers anyway), but limiting the speed of the car can have dangerous repurcussions. People need to be taught how to drive, and how to do so responsibly. Education is the key, not restriction.

That's a pretty gross generalization that frankly, I take offence to. I remember being a teenager (not that long ago) and I didn't speed. I don't speed today either; I have no speeding fines because I don't speed.

That being said, I have to a stand against any system that limits driver control. I can understand things like ABS, ESC, and Powered Steering, because they improve driver control (for most drivers anyway), but limiting the speed of the car can have dangerous repurcussions. People need to be taught how to drive, and how to do so responsibly. Education is the key, not restriction.

I'm glad you take offense, but really, quite frankly you are in the vast minority. Limiting the speed to 80 MPH isn't going to limit somebody's learning.

To respond to the idiot who posted the scenario about a kid being at a traffic light and having to accelerate: Seriously, if you're at a stop light you won't need to go up higher than 80MPH, and if they did, they would take too long to get to that speed and would be in an accident anyways. Your scenario is bogus.

It might stop some of the small offenders but for ones who can afford to hot up their car and have a tendency to hoon, this will be a minor distraction which they will easily hack or remove. Plus they are relying on the parents to do the right thing, what about the parents who don't care? Personally this isn't a solution. They should be teaching young people how to drive responsibly, not just how to pass the license test, THAT is the problem. Sure not all young drivers are bad drivers, but it only takes one ******** to ruin it everyone.

How would they implement the seatbelt thing? How can the car tell if there's people in the backseat? I can understand maybe a weight pressure system, but what if they just have boxes or something, heh. I suppose they could just plug in the seatbelt anyway.

How would they implement the seatbelt thing? How can the car tell if there's people in the backseat? I can understand maybe a weight pressure system, but what if they just have boxes or something, heh. I suppose they could just plug in the seatbelt anyway.

Interesting point. Every morning I throw my 15-20 pound backpack (Where like 10 pounds is probably my laptop and AC adapter :x ) into my passenger side seat. The indicator shows that the airbag is off for that side but the seatbelt alarm never comes on. I guess it has something to do with the whole weight thing -- if the airbag is off, the seatbelt warning may be off as well.

Parked at an intersection, suddenly the responsible teen sees a truck careening right at them. They stomp on the gas to move out of the way. "I'm sorry Dave, but I can't allow you to do that" says the car, right before the teen is killed in the collision.

Ok maybe I'm exaggerating just a bit but I hate BS like this. This sounds like something for people who suck as parents.

they are limiting the top speed, not the acceleration.

Bad idea. It's no use saying to a potentially good driver "well, you're only 18, so you can only go at this speed", but then to say to an older person who may frequently drive dangerously that it's okay because he/she is older.

Drivers need to take responsibility for themselves and how they drive. Young or old.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!