Which Service Pack of Windows XP do you use?  

277 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Service Pack of Windows XP do you use?

    • Windows XP SP1
      1
    • Windows XP SP2
      24
    • Windows XP SP3
      252


Recommended Posts

It's a load of bollocks imo. I've upgraded countless computers to SP3, and i'm yet to see any trouble with any of them.

The only issue I struck was the Compaq/HP BSOD caused by their faulty image. A quick reg-tweak, and the problem is solved.

I can't see what people are getting worked up about. SP3 brings a lot of enhancements to the table, why wouldn't you want to install it :s

i agree with +Raa

I found SP3 to be great for windows xp and even found on some instances the speed of programs opening to be a slight bit quicker than when i had SP2. There isnt any noticable differences with SP3 compared to 2 but its got all the latest security and a few system modifications (i guess which is why its made it quicker)

Go ahead with installed sp3 :)

for some reason i thought title was why Pps say PS3 sucks, lawl, and i was like, yay another flamefest to be in.

oh no matter.

i use SP3 ( well i downgraded twice to SP2 for comaptibility for some stuff, some stuff i use are made for SP2, and didnt work on SP3, not much more then that)

adding to the 'go with sp3' bandwagon.

on a side note, only thing i've personally noticed is that if the tooltips get hidden behind the task bar, till sp2, you could right click -> sort by name twice in the start menu to fix it (i know it sounds ridiculous, but it did work) - that's the only thing that doesnt work in sp3 - which brings it to 2003 sp2 behaviour.

however, a workaround for this is available - google for tooltipfixer (.net 2.0 required)

those people will also tell you never to upgrade anything to vista and won't give you a good reason for it. they will just tell you because it sucks....

Amen! Everytime I boot up my laptop at school I get this "uh, vista sucks dude", it gets kinda annoying to be honest, especially since they can't explain as to why it would suck. Hence, some people in my class didn't even install it, they are just bashing on it.

Just like SP3, installed it on my brother's PC and on my parents their PC, nothing wrong with it. Both (completely different machines) are running fine. Not that I expected it any differently... :)

Just go with SP3 and tell everyone who says it sucks to shove it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!