Brand New to Vista


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I was a long time XP user and finally made the jump to Vista. I'm about 48 hours in and I really love it! With my hardware it is silky smooth.

Anyway, I plan to dig around this forum for little nuggets, but I thought I'd create this post. What kind of recommendations do you have for a first time user? I know the first thing I did was disabled the UAC. What else should I know?

BTW, Vista Home Premium. Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/679696-brand-new-to-vista/
Share on other sites

You need to disable some services to make it even more smooth the experience:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=513758

bad idea as you won't gain much if anything and turning off UAC is silly, use Tweak UAC instead if the prompts bother you and the best thing is to let let do it's thing and install what you need and vista will do the rest. also install service pack 1 if you have not done so.also what are your specs?

Best site for information on disabling services and their effects is Black Vipers site

As mentioned above, it is beneficial to keep UAC enabled, I have never understood people who say turn it off, but that is your choice really. But let's not turn this into another UAC debate please.

Why are people suggesting disabling any services? You get NO benefit from doing so. If anything, you would negatively impact your already smooth experience. Another suggestion is to LEAVE UAC ON, and not mess with its settings. Also, if you let Vista do its thing, you will learn that your system will get better over time. People feel the need to disable things in Vista due to how they used to be in XP. In Vista, that is not the case.

There are a few suggestions that can give an even better experience without doing any harm. What I do first thing on a new install is enable "Launch folder windows in a separate process" under the View tab in Folder Options. (While in the Folder Options, you can also enable "Use check box to select items" which can be quite handy at times.) The second is to disable "Highlight newly installed programs" in your Start Menu options. You'll find that option if you type "Taskbar and Start Menu" in the Start Menu search, then click on the Customize button on the Start Menu tab.

uac stops software from making system wide changes without your knowledge. people perceive this as annoying when they're doing things they know they can trust but its great for stopping things from happening that you wouldn't otherwise know about (spyware/malware/virus/etc)

What is the point of UAC?

You already know the prescribed answer to this - you have "contributed" in threads where this has been discussed to death. I suggest you are trolling.

However, just in case you missed it all those times before (by missed - I mean "ignored" as it doesn't suit your agenda):

UAC stops applications from making major system alterations without you knowing. As such, it put's the onus on you to allow these changes.

Unless you sit altering your system on a daily basis - it would be hard to argue that UAC was truly annoying.

You already know the prescribed answer to this - you have "contributed" in threads where this has been discussed to death. I suggest you are trolling.

However, just in case you missed it all those times before (by missed - I mean "ignored" as it doesn't suit your agenda):

UAC stops applications from making major system alterations without you knowing. As such, it put's the onus on you to allow these changes.

Unless you sit altering your system on a daily basis - it would be hard to argue that UAC was truly annoying.

First of all, if I knew the answer, I would not be asking the question.

Second, I am NOT "trolling".

Third, the next time you are going to answer someone's question, do it without the unnecessary smart comments since they serve no purpose. Just because you think you know everything and all things on Windows Vista doesn't mean everyone else does.

And finally, I do not read every post concerning Vista so yes I probably did missed the UAC arguments.

i like hte idea of going back to xp.... but since you aren't gonna do that. just be patient with vista. it looks really nice at first and everything is slick. but then you start getting annoyed with little stuff and before you know it you are frustrated to the point of turning back.... that's exactly what you shouldn't do. because with vista once you figure out how to get ride of the things that frustrate you, it's a rather nice experience.

given that you have a nice set of hardware. keep all the services so you avoid any complications... as you get more familiar with the system, you can start making those changes.

UAC does MUCH more than "annoy" you with prompts. even if you use tweak UAC and put it in "silent mode" (uac enabled but no prompts) it is MUCH more secure than xp. There is almost NO point in disabling it when you can put it in silent mode.

With UAC enabled every process runs at the lowest integrity level. It also uses file and registry Virtualization among other things and is one of the best features of vista imo. Every vista exploit I have seen is foiled with uac enabled.

http://www.tweak-uac.com/home/

except emon nobody hardly contributed anything useful, stop the UAC flaming please.

anyway, look into services you need and dont urself, before disabling something, even if its by a guide, think if you'll need it first.

isn't daemon tools bundled with crap?

Edited by Matan Mates
except emon nobody hardly contributed anything useful, stop the UAC flaming please.

anyway, look into services you need and dont urself, before disabling something, even if its by a guide, think if you'll need it first.

isn't daemon tools bundled with crap?

Yes, daemon tools wants to install a spyware but just uncheck that option when you are installing it.

For the best Vista experience, do a clean install on any new computer you get (to get rid of all the OEM crap) and don't disable anything. That includes UAC and indexing services. Leave them alone. They are built into the OS and enabled for a reason.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!