Downloading TV Shows Illegal?


Recommended Posts

There are legal precedents regarding using a home video recording device to record content you subscribe to and/or receive on TV for "time shifting" purposes. If you want the legal precedent, I believe it was involving Sony BetaMax and Universal.

Downloading TV shows from Youtube or other sources does not fall under the same category as time shifting a broadcast right from what you are already receiving. Currently, this runs afoul of copyright law - until such time a case is made that sets a precedent that it is OK to download whole episodes (say, downloading the entire Seinfeld 9 seasons or whatever, ripped from DVD).

Sure, you can catch Seinfeld daily on almost any channel these days (so it seems), but it does not give any individual the right to download them.

My understanding is that the law says it is illegal to share/distribute things for which you do not own the copyright or distribution permission.

Using bittorrent, you're sharing/distributing. That's against the law.

Thats not entirely it. Partly but it's also to do with licensing and rating.

The channels that carry the show are the only ones licensed to provide it, you aren't allowed to provide it (share/distribute) like you mentioned but you are also not allowed to obtain it from unlicensed sources.

Also they don't want people downloading it because they cannot keep track of that to count towards ratings. Official ratings with what determines how much they should/could charge for advertising. So more people downloading the show, less ratings, less revenue from their ad spots.

They also don't like downloads obviously because they don't have the commercials. Even though yes, you may pay for your cable and record it on a DVR/PVR and skip the commercials, they have been fighting about the use of technology used to bypass commercials with such ease, since TiVo came on the scene.

Illegal or not, if KXAN and NBC wont let timewarner broadcast their signal, ill keep downloading my shows to watch them. Im not making a profit, and the signal they broadcast is given to them free by the government, so watching the show in another way when the first way isnt available , i see it as being ok lol.

Illegal or not, if KXAN and NBC wont let timewarner broadcast their signal, ill keep downloading my shows to watch them. Im not making a profit, and the signal they broadcast is given to them free by the government, so watching the show in another way when the first way isnt available , i see it as being ok lol.
(N)

Along the same lines, one could say:

Illegal or not, if Microsoft and Adobe wont let The Pirate Bay torrent their software, I'll keep downloading Windows and Photoshop to install them. I'm not making a profit, and the software they torrent is given to them free by the government, so downloading the swoftware in another way when the first way isn't available , i see it as being ok lol.
Obviously not a perfect analogy, but the concept of some "right" to infringe copyright is still the same between the two.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

*boom headshot*

It does seem to be a touchy area. If I can record something that is given to me freely, whether I watch it on my DVR or on

my computer is my prerogative. The argument that the individual should be watching "time-shifted" material only on their

personal TV is a weak one. Is big brother watching everyone's tv set to make sure?

I often will forget or miss the half of a show, so I will find it online. Either a youtube-like site or download it, watch it, and dispose

of it. While some individuals out there will likely download shows to sell them as dvds, most people I think just want to catch

up on their show.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

This. One way or another they're getting their money out of me. I don't see what the huge issue is. If I don't watch it on TV, but buy it on DVD later. They still aren't getting money from commercials.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

Same here. There would be a lot of people who do just that, good luck taking legal action against millions of people.

To me its as simple as, TV programming is not going to rule my time. I watch what I want, when I want.

To me, there's a difference between whether something is illegal versus whether something is unethical.

1. Downloading TV shows available OTA: Illegal, but not unethical

2. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you subscribe to: Illegal, but not unethical

3. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you do not subscribe to: Illegal, somewhat unethical

At least, that's my opinion. For number 3, I feel that there's an exception if there is no way to purchase the show without purchasing the channel (e.g. True Blood episodes aren't available for purchase, so I'd have no problem downloading them).

Well not only that, I pay for cable each month. If I choose to watch my shows when they air or when I feel like it, that's my choice.

If I missed tonight's Stargate: Atlantis episode, I was "able" to watch it, but I was occupied playing GTA:IV. If it were to air again

as a repeat or I download, there is no difference. I still paid for that show to be available for me to watch.

By that logic all songs that have ever aired on the radio should also be free.

Oh, and if you're invited to a friends house to watch a movie, but decline, you should also be able to download that movie for free since you wouldn't have paid for it anyway, or you friend could have lent it to you.[/sarcasm]

Besides arn't there legal means to watch most shows you missed online? If you're only going to watch it once, why not watch the streaming version on the networks' website, and let them have their fair share of ad revenue? The economy is based on capitalism, if you don't support the companies that bring you the content, they'll just cancel the shows. And if you don't support capitalism, then you're a communist, and if you're a communist then the terrorists have won :shiftyninja:

Generalizing gets you nowhere. Simple because I stated my opinion doesn't in fact mean it applies to all situations.

Yes, a friend that owns Ironman and wants to watch it with me, yet I decline is a situation where I don't have the "right" to view it.

Same goes for internet radio. I can listen to free internet streams which are plentiful, however, I am not circumventing any measures

that are in place for subscription-based stations. I put up with the commercials on free internet radio and sit through the ads.

To me, there's a difference between whether something is illegal versus whether something is unethical.

1. Downloading TV shows available OTA: Illegal, but not unethical

2. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you subscribe to: Illegal, but not unethical

3. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you do not subscribe to: Illegal, somewhat unethical

At least, that's my opinion. For number 3, I feel that there's an exception if there is no way to purchase the show without purchasing the channel (e.g. True Blood episodes aren't available for purchase, so I'd have no problem downloading them).

There is no ethical police on the interwebz :p

btw, True Blood awesome. :cool:

I have no moral conviction downloading something like Heroes, Prison Break, or any other show that I would otherwise watch as it airs for the first time (for current seasons, not for past seasons). Almost every show I watch is available the next day on Hulu, so my only motivation to download the episodes would be to stream them to my 360 since PlayOn has been having Hulu issues for quite a while now, and I very likely won't be paying for the service once my trial has ended. Once I've watched the show, I no longer contain the file. Lost and The Office are an exception to that rule for differing reasons.

It's illegal plain and simple. Until recently in Australia it was illegal to even record a show off TV. I do it anyway because I want to see it now :p and waiting for it to air on Australian TV is just a waste of time (although Heroes Season 3 is airing here now so I'm just watching it on TV) and also I don't feel what I'm doing in stealing, as I plan to buy the DVD boxset away. It was what I've done in the past and what I will continue to do. However, the studios see it as revenue lose and treat those who do it as pirates....personally I don't see a problem, I buy it soon as it's released on DVD so it's not like they are losing a sale over it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!