Downloading TV Shows Illegal?


Recommended Posts

There are legal precedents regarding using a home video recording device to record content you subscribe to and/or receive on TV for "time shifting" purposes. If you want the legal precedent, I believe it was involving Sony BetaMax and Universal.

Downloading TV shows from Youtube or other sources does not fall under the same category as time shifting a broadcast right from what you are already receiving. Currently, this runs afoul of copyright law - until such time a case is made that sets a precedent that it is OK to download whole episodes (say, downloading the entire Seinfeld 9 seasons or whatever, ripped from DVD).

Sure, you can catch Seinfeld daily on almost any channel these days (so it seems), but it does not give any individual the right to download them.

My understanding is that the law says it is illegal to share/distribute things for which you do not own the copyright or distribution permission.

Using bittorrent, you're sharing/distributing. That's against the law.

Thats not entirely it. Partly but it's also to do with licensing and rating.

The channels that carry the show are the only ones licensed to provide it, you aren't allowed to provide it (share/distribute) like you mentioned but you are also not allowed to obtain it from unlicensed sources.

Also they don't want people downloading it because they cannot keep track of that to count towards ratings. Official ratings with what determines how much they should/could charge for advertising. So more people downloading the show, less ratings, less revenue from their ad spots.

They also don't like downloads obviously because they don't have the commercials. Even though yes, you may pay for your cable and record it on a DVR/PVR and skip the commercials, they have been fighting about the use of technology used to bypass commercials with such ease, since TiVo came on the scene.

Illegal or not, if KXAN and NBC wont let timewarner broadcast their signal, ill keep downloading my shows to watch them. Im not making a profit, and the signal they broadcast is given to them free by the government, so watching the show in another way when the first way isnt available , i see it as being ok lol.

Illegal or not, if KXAN and NBC wont let timewarner broadcast their signal, ill keep downloading my shows to watch them. Im not making a profit, and the signal they broadcast is given to them free by the government, so watching the show in another way when the first way isnt available , i see it as being ok lol.
(N)

Along the same lines, one could say:

Illegal or not, if Microsoft and Adobe wont let The Pirate Bay torrent their software, I'll keep downloading Windows and Photoshop to install them. I'm not making a profit, and the software they torrent is given to them free by the government, so downloading the swoftware in another way when the first way isn't available , i see it as being ok lol.
Obviously not a perfect analogy, but the concept of some "right" to infringe copyright is still the same between the two.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

*boom headshot*

It does seem to be a touchy area. If I can record something that is given to me freely, whether I watch it on my DVR or on

my computer is my prerogative. The argument that the individual should be watching "time-shifted" material only on their

personal TV is a weak one. Is big brother watching everyone's tv set to make sure?

I often will forget or miss the half of a show, so I will find it online. Either a youtube-like site or download it, watch it, and dispose

of it. While some individuals out there will likely download shows to sell them as dvds, most people I think just want to catch

up on their show.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

This. One way or another they're getting their money out of me. I don't see what the huge issue is. If I don't watch it on TV, but buy it on DVD later. They still aren't getting money from commercials.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

Same here. There would be a lot of people who do just that, good luck taking legal action against millions of people.

To me its as simple as, TV programming is not going to rule my time. I watch what I want, when I want.

To me, there's a difference between whether something is illegal versus whether something is unethical.

1. Downloading TV shows available OTA: Illegal, but not unethical

2. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you subscribe to: Illegal, but not unethical

3. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you do not subscribe to: Illegal, somewhat unethical

At least, that's my opinion. For number 3, I feel that there's an exception if there is no way to purchase the show without purchasing the channel (e.g. True Blood episodes aren't available for purchase, so I'd have no problem downloading them).

Well not only that, I pay for cable each month. If I choose to watch my shows when they air or when I feel like it, that's my choice.

If I missed tonight's Stargate: Atlantis episode, I was "able" to watch it, but I was occupied playing GTA:IV. If it were to air again

as a repeat or I download, there is no difference. I still paid for that show to be available for me to watch.

By that logic all songs that have ever aired on the radio should also be free.

Oh, and if you're invited to a friends house to watch a movie, but decline, you should also be able to download that movie for free since you wouldn't have paid for it anyway, or you friend could have lent it to you.[/sarcasm]

Besides arn't there legal means to watch most shows you missed online? If you're only going to watch it once, why not watch the streaming version on the networks' website, and let them have their fair share of ad revenue? The economy is based on capitalism, if you don't support the companies that bring you the content, they'll just cancel the shows. And if you don't support capitalism, then you're a communist, and if you're a communist then the terrorists have won :shiftyninja:

Generalizing gets you nowhere. Simple because I stated my opinion doesn't in fact mean it applies to all situations.

Yes, a friend that owns Ironman and wants to watch it with me, yet I decline is a situation where I don't have the "right" to view it.

Same goes for internet radio. I can listen to free internet streams which are plentiful, however, I am not circumventing any measures

that are in place for subscription-based stations. I put up with the commercials on free internet radio and sit through the ads.

To me, there's a difference between whether something is illegal versus whether something is unethical.

1. Downloading TV shows available OTA: Illegal, but not unethical

2. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you subscribe to: Illegal, but not unethical

3. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you do not subscribe to: Illegal, somewhat unethical

At least, that's my opinion. For number 3, I feel that there's an exception if there is no way to purchase the show without purchasing the channel (e.g. True Blood episodes aren't available for purchase, so I'd have no problem downloading them).

There is no ethical police on the interwebz :p

btw, True Blood awesome. :cool:

I have no moral conviction downloading something like Heroes, Prison Break, or any other show that I would otherwise watch as it airs for the first time (for current seasons, not for past seasons). Almost every show I watch is available the next day on Hulu, so my only motivation to download the episodes would be to stream them to my 360 since PlayOn has been having Hulu issues for quite a while now, and I very likely won't be paying for the service once my trial has ended. Once I've watched the show, I no longer contain the file. Lost and The Office are an exception to that rule for differing reasons.

It's illegal plain and simple. Until recently in Australia it was illegal to even record a show off TV. I do it anyway because I want to see it now :p and waiting for it to air on Australian TV is just a waste of time (although Heroes Season 3 is airing here now so I'm just watching it on TV) and also I don't feel what I'm doing in stealing, as I plan to buy the DVD boxset away. It was what I've done in the past and what I will continue to do. However, the studios see it as revenue lose and treat those who do it as pirates....personally I don't see a problem, I buy it soon as it's released on DVD so it's not like they are losing a sale over it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      558
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!