Downloading TV Shows Illegal?


Recommended Posts

There are legal precedents regarding using a home video recording device to record content you subscribe to and/or receive on TV for "time shifting" purposes. If you want the legal precedent, I believe it was involving Sony BetaMax and Universal.

Downloading TV shows from Youtube or other sources does not fall under the same category as time shifting a broadcast right from what you are already receiving. Currently, this runs afoul of copyright law - until such time a case is made that sets a precedent that it is OK to download whole episodes (say, downloading the entire Seinfeld 9 seasons or whatever, ripped from DVD).

Sure, you can catch Seinfeld daily on almost any channel these days (so it seems), but it does not give any individual the right to download them.

My understanding is that the law says it is illegal to share/distribute things for which you do not own the copyright or distribution permission.

Using bittorrent, you're sharing/distributing. That's against the law.

Thats not entirely it. Partly but it's also to do with licensing and rating.

The channels that carry the show are the only ones licensed to provide it, you aren't allowed to provide it (share/distribute) like you mentioned but you are also not allowed to obtain it from unlicensed sources.

Also they don't want people downloading it because they cannot keep track of that to count towards ratings. Official ratings with what determines how much they should/could charge for advertising. So more people downloading the show, less ratings, less revenue from their ad spots.

They also don't like downloads obviously because they don't have the commercials. Even though yes, you may pay for your cable and record it on a DVR/PVR and skip the commercials, they have been fighting about the use of technology used to bypass commercials with such ease, since TiVo came on the scene.

Illegal or not, if KXAN and NBC wont let timewarner broadcast their signal, ill keep downloading my shows to watch them. Im not making a profit, and the signal they broadcast is given to them free by the government, so watching the show in another way when the first way isnt available , i see it as being ok lol.

Illegal or not, if KXAN and NBC wont let timewarner broadcast their signal, ill keep downloading my shows to watch them. Im not making a profit, and the signal they broadcast is given to them free by the government, so watching the show in another way when the first way isnt available , i see it as being ok lol.
(N)

Along the same lines, one could say:

Illegal or not, if Microsoft and Adobe wont let The Pirate Bay torrent their software, I'll keep downloading Windows and Photoshop to install them. I'm not making a profit, and the software they torrent is given to them free by the government, so downloading the swoftware in another way when the first way isn't available , i see it as being ok lol.
Obviously not a perfect analogy, but the concept of some "right" to infringe copyright is still the same between the two.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

*boom headshot*

It does seem to be a touchy area. If I can record something that is given to me freely, whether I watch it on my DVR or on

my computer is my prerogative. The argument that the individual should be watching "time-shifted" material only on their

personal TV is a weak one. Is big brother watching everyone's tv set to make sure?

I often will forget or miss the half of a show, so I will find it online. Either a youtube-like site or download it, watch it, and dispose

of it. While some individuals out there will likely download shows to sell them as dvds, most people I think just want to catch

up on their show.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

This. One way or another they're getting their money out of me. I don't see what the huge issue is. If I don't watch it on TV, but buy it on DVD later. They still aren't getting money from commercials.

Well, I download a few shows to rewatch them.

I often toss them out then.

It's not for personal profit.

As for the ads, I either buy the product already or have no use for it.

If it's illegal to watch a a TV show that was once aired for 'free', then shoot me. :s

Same here. There would be a lot of people who do just that, good luck taking legal action against millions of people.

To me its as simple as, TV programming is not going to rule my time. I watch what I want, when I want.

To me, there's a difference between whether something is illegal versus whether something is unethical.

1. Downloading TV shows available OTA: Illegal, but not unethical

2. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you subscribe to: Illegal, but not unethical

3. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you do not subscribe to: Illegal, somewhat unethical

At least, that's my opinion. For number 3, I feel that there's an exception if there is no way to purchase the show without purchasing the channel (e.g. True Blood episodes aren't available for purchase, so I'd have no problem downloading them).

Well not only that, I pay for cable each month. If I choose to watch my shows when they air or when I feel like it, that's my choice.

If I missed tonight's Stargate: Atlantis episode, I was "able" to watch it, but I was occupied playing GTA:IV. If it were to air again

as a repeat or I download, there is no difference. I still paid for that show to be available for me to watch.

By that logic all songs that have ever aired on the radio should also be free.

Oh, and if you're invited to a friends house to watch a movie, but decline, you should also be able to download that movie for free since you wouldn't have paid for it anyway, or you friend could have lent it to you.[/sarcasm]

Besides arn't there legal means to watch most shows you missed online? If you're only going to watch it once, why not watch the streaming version on the networks' website, and let them have their fair share of ad revenue? The economy is based on capitalism, if you don't support the companies that bring you the content, they'll just cancel the shows. And if you don't support capitalism, then you're a communist, and if you're a communist then the terrorists have won :shiftyninja:

Generalizing gets you nowhere. Simple because I stated my opinion doesn't in fact mean it applies to all situations.

Yes, a friend that owns Ironman and wants to watch it with me, yet I decline is a situation where I don't have the "right" to view it.

Same goes for internet radio. I can listen to free internet streams which are plentiful, however, I am not circumventing any measures

that are in place for subscription-based stations. I put up with the commercials on free internet radio and sit through the ads.

To me, there's a difference between whether something is illegal versus whether something is unethical.

1. Downloading TV shows available OTA: Illegal, but not unethical

2. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you subscribe to: Illegal, but not unethical

3. Downloading TV shows available on cable channels you do not subscribe to: Illegal, somewhat unethical

At least, that's my opinion. For number 3, I feel that there's an exception if there is no way to purchase the show without purchasing the channel (e.g. True Blood episodes aren't available for purchase, so I'd have no problem downloading them).

There is no ethical police on the interwebz :p

btw, True Blood awesome. :cool:

I have no moral conviction downloading something like Heroes, Prison Break, or any other show that I would otherwise watch as it airs for the first time (for current seasons, not for past seasons). Almost every show I watch is available the next day on Hulu, so my only motivation to download the episodes would be to stream them to my 360 since PlayOn has been having Hulu issues for quite a while now, and I very likely won't be paying for the service once my trial has ended. Once I've watched the show, I no longer contain the file. Lost and The Office are an exception to that rule for differing reasons.

It's illegal plain and simple. Until recently in Australia it was illegal to even record a show off TV. I do it anyway because I want to see it now :p and waiting for it to air on Australian TV is just a waste of time (although Heroes Season 3 is airing here now so I'm just watching it on TV) and also I don't feel what I'm doing in stealing, as I plan to buy the DVD boxset away. It was what I've done in the past and what I will continue to do. However, the studios see it as revenue lose and treat those who do it as pirates....personally I don't see a problem, I buy it soon as it's released on DVD so it's not like they are losing a sale over it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!