OpenBSD cannot get an IP with DHCP


Recommended Posts

I have installed OpenBSD on VirtualBox this evening, everything seems fine, except the networking.

I have enabled networking in VirtualBox to use "Host interface" as network connection of the virtual machine. This configuration does work for Windows Vista on another virtual machine. I then, in OpenBSD, checked /etc/hostname.em0, there is only a word dhcp, which suppose to make OpenBSD to get a private IP from DHCP server. I also checked /etc/resolv.conf, I leave a line, 192.168.1.1, which points to the router in my home. I then ifconfig em0 down and then ifconfig em0 up. However, after these steps, OpenBSD still cannot find host 192.168.1.1.

I wonder if it is problem of OpenBSD or I missed something? I tried to use static IP for my OpenBSD too, but that didn't help.

Thanks for any input.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/680934-openbsd-cannot-get-an-ip-with-dhcp/
Share on other sites

  Gundamdriver said:
I have installed OpenBSD on VirtualBox this evening, everything seems fine, except the networking.

I have enabled networking in VirtualBox to use "Host interface" as network connection of the virtual machine. This configuration does work for Windows Vista on another virtual machine. I then, in OpenBSD, checked /etc/hostname.em0, there is only a word dhcp, which suppose to make OpenBSD to get a private IP from DHCP server. I also checked /etc/resolv.conf, I leave a line, 192.168.1.1, which points to the router in my home. I then ifconfig em0 down and then ifconfig em0 up. However, after these steps, OpenBSD still cannot find host 192.168.1.1.

I wonder if it is problem of OpenBSD or I missed something? I tried to use static IP for my OpenBSD too, but that didn't help.

Thanks for any input.

I know in Linux just doing a ifconfig <interface> up/down does not reinitiate a request to the DHCP server for an IP address. It either takes the interface down or up.

Using some sort of DHCP client is what gets the IP address from a dhcp server, as someone above has just mentioned. try outputting the results of ifconfig. Do you see a private IP address listed there for that interface?

This afternoon I tried dhclient, DHCPDISCOVER still couldn't get a private IP from my router, perhaps there are some problems with the configuration of utility?

I also made a search on Google, and I found this:

http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/ne...ure_network.php

The command ifconfig <IP> netmask <subnet mask> and route add default <gateway IP> helped me to get replies from ping google.com. The network is fine now, but it is using static IP (I want it to use DHCP).

Perhaps I need to spend sometime on dhclient and /etc/dhclient.conf.

Thanks everyone.

  markjensen said:
And Hurd, and Solaris, and ...?

1) Linux/BSD/Unix Installation, Hardware, and OS Configuration Help

2) Linux/BSD/Unix Server Services Configuration and Help

I think those two sub-forums would get posts categorized to be a lot more helpful in topic management.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I too have worked with pro gear for decades and so I found the interface to be unintuitive from both the pro and casual side (a rare "accomplishment" by what are obviously otherwise skilled coders, hehe). I eventually got it to work, thanks for offering, but I found other compatibility issues with my own use case, so I just dropped it entirely. Right now, I just use an analog line out/line in approach which works as expected across all usage scenarios. With both machines on the same power block/outlet, I'm not getting any analog hum or hiss. My next step will be to try the updated Multiplicity 4 when a bug, addressing this very issue unfortunately, is resolved. Knowing Stardock, that could be tomorrow or five years from now, so I check back every few months to see it it's fixed and I want to upgrade. Again, thanks for offering to help.
    • We recognize that performance can use some improvements, and we continue to work on improving it. However, it's worth noting that massive performance improvements don't happen overnight, they take a lot of work and effort, and in most cases, the improvements are more noticeable when you compare across several updates. That said, Files is open-source and everyone is invited to help with these efforts 🙂
    • A lot of effort has gone into improving stability and Files Preview now has a 99% crash free rate. These improvements will make their way to Files Stable when v4 is released later this year. If you're still experiencing issues, please report them on GitHub or Discord so we can track them properly.
    • In addition to the political nature of Elon musk aside. AI Chat bots still have issues that is still a bit of a black box they are still trying to figure and are still not trust worthy to do what they say at this time. This is an area of “go fast and break things” mantra with tech is a very bad idea.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Snake Doc went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      nobody9 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Ricky Chan earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      leoniDAM earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Ian_ earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      203
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      198
    4. 4
      Xenon
      137
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      116
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!