Brothers in arms hells highway sucks!


Recommended Posts

Oh guys, i posted this in the general games bit cause its out for ps3/x360 and pc

I dont get it? it looks terrible, lacks any "next gen" game dynamics, the animation is terrible, the textures are rubbish, the grass looks fake.

the voice acting doesnt match with the lips, and not to mention its crap gameplay.

when did this game become so bad after looking so good quite recently?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/681382-brothers-in-arms-hells-highway-sucks/
Share on other sites

So they just decided to ruin the game completely in those 2 years :laugh: ?

Yeah even if it did come out in 2006 it would still be a bad game!

you would think that when working on a game for 3-4 years would produce a great end product.

But no, obviously UBI decided to spend all their money on taking their employees to social paintballing events and forgot about making a good game.

Posted this in the PC section.

Check this out http://www.gamershell.com/news_32449.html ( Watch the stream in case you don't want to download ).

Back then the game looked great, everything had a very authentic feel and the game looked great. Today the game still 'looks' like that but everything is so scaled back! Special effects look like crap, towns consist of a broken house, a shed and 2 ft of fence. Every cutscene has horrible animations and as you said the lipsyncing is off. Doesn't feel like the built the game to look good and have great performance, feels more like they built the game to really good and just cut away things to get the performance on par.

Some of you will not like this but it's due to PS3 :huh:

?In previous ?Brothers in Arms,? we had farmed out the PlayStation versions to other developers who were PlayStation experts,? he stated. ?So we had to build up all that expertise in-house to understand that platform."

Creating a title for three platforms also appeared to take its toll, Cooke continued. "There?s just major hardware differences; you don?t know if your Xbox guy has a hard drive but your PlayStation guy does, and you?ve got 8 cores on this machine and 4 and a half on this machine and some PC users have?who knows how many??

MTV Multiplayer

Some of you will not like this but it's due to PS3 :huh:

Sounds like a blame game of bad management. If development is really being set back that much due to PS3, it's going to be far more cost effective to drop the PS3 version, or to finish it after the PC and 360 version is complete.

Some of you will not like this but it's due to PS3 :huh:

I don't see a single thing there pointing to the PS3 being a problem.

If they couldn't handle working on a Playstation system they shouldn't have tried. They should have outsourced like they've done before rather than bring the quality down for everybody. It's nothing to do with the PS3, it's everything to do with poor management and poor development choices.

well thats what you get when you don't follow the other games and buy this one you'll be disappointed. no it's not perfect but it's a massive improvement on the others. this games not supposed to be a next gen benchmarking game it supposed to continue telling the story of baker i'd say it doesn't suck but what were you expecting you should have looked at preview movies first and screen shots.

I enjoyed it and found it good and fine to follow the story with besides minor graphics glitch i ran into. I'm looking forward to the next game too.

btw it's made on unreal 3 engine so for anyone else expecting this to be some far cry 2 / crysis game it isn't and never will be a hardware pushing game it's always been an unreal engine game focused on the story and gameplay more then the graphics.

I loved it and will play through it again! Its not a straight shooter like COD or MOH and is not to be played in a run and gun style. Its probably got more in common with the likes of R6V. I'm disappointed there is no single player skirmish mode though. I doubt the PS3 was the problem, as we all know full well it handles UE3 superbly. Just a case of bad development, and delay after delay meaning it looked "dated" on release. I really enjoyed the squad controls and the game comes into its own when you play it on Authentic.

I'm currently renting this game. Never played the old BIA.

Honestly I hated this game when I first got it. The controls really ****ed me off (ex left trigger is for squad commands and clicking the right stick is to aim). But the game really grew on me, and I say I'm into it.

My biggest complaint is that you can't command your squads using the tactical map and only can command your squad using the first person view. If this was a truly tactical game, I would think you can command your squad using the map, right? that would make it a great combination of RTS and FPS.

But they did a pretty good job in the tactical aspect. There were many times I had to replay a mission because my squad placement was just wrong.

I do agree that the place-and-flank gameplay does get old. And there were many solo missions, which I would think they wouldn't pay attention to so much if they market this game as a tactical shooter.

Also, I don't mind the graphics so much. It doesn't take away from the game IMHO.

I downloaded the demo expecting a crap game from what was said here, but it really wasn't all that bad. Pretty well polished, interesting mechanics, and a good game if you're into the style of FPS it is. It's personally not for me -- I don't care for that type of FPS and I hate the WW2 setting, but it wasn't bad.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!