How to enlighten ignorant friends?


Recommended Posts

LOL , i thoguht this is some big issue where ur friend is ignorant in some funny way or i thought it would be some windows/linux thread but games?

Come on, if he doesn't like multiplayer games, that's the same as him saying I dont like first person shooters but i enjoy racing games. Who cares? Theres no need for "enlightement" He has his view you have yours, play multiplayer gmaes with him, and if you want to play mass effect on ur own go ahead, dont need him in it.

Grab a hold of yourself and learn to appericiate that people have their own reasons and opinions and likings, or "preference"

LOL , i thoguht this is some big issue where ur friend is ignorant in some funny way or i thought it would be some windows/linux thread but games?

Come on, if he doesn't like multiplayer games, that's the same as him saying I dont like first person shooters but i enjoy racing games. Who cares? Theres no need for "enlightement" He has his view you have yours, play multiplayer gmaes with him, and if you want to play mass effect on ur own go ahead, dont need him in it.

Grab a hold of yourself and learn to appericiate that people have their own reasons and opinions and likings, or "preference"

Uh no not totally.

Take this scenario.

You love racing games, your favourite genre. Two amazing racing games come out, the one with online gets 8/10, the one without 9/10.

Then you apply the logic in post 1

"a game without multi-player should not even be considered for game of the year."
will never play a game without multi-player (and a game can not be good without it.)

:blink:

People have different tastes in games, thats why there's so much veriety. Its not ignorant to dislike certain games due to missing out on things they like, its more ignorant to try and convince them otherwise.

Some people like Multiplayer FPS's.

Some people like Singleplayer FPS's.

Some people like Multiplayer RPG's.

Some people like Singleplayer RPG's.

Some people like Multiplayer RTS's.

Some people like Singleplayer RTS's.

etc.

You get your entertainment from story/lure, he gets his entertainment from playing with other people online (and prob killing them :p).

Uh no not totally.

Take this scenario.

You love racing games, your favourite genre. Two amazing racing games come out, the one with online gets 8/10, the one without 9/10.

Then you apply the logic in post 1

If i love racing games and i absolutly love playing racing games online.. I'd get the online racing game.

Also why are you bringing reviews into it, they are just people's opinions.. just like his.

Why should multiplayer be tacked on even if it doesn't fit the game itself? How would you add multiplayer to a game like Bioshock, Assassin's Creed, Uncharted, Mass Effect, Oblivion, etc., and not have it end up like Metal Gear Online?

+1

People have different tastes in games, thats why there's so much veriety. Its not ignorant to dislike certain games due to missing out on things they like, its more ignorant to try and convince them otherwise.

Some people like Multiplayer FPS's.

Some people like Singleplayer FPS's.

Some people like Multiplayer RPG's.

Some people like Singleplayer RPG's.

Some people like Multiplayer RTS's.

Some people like Singleplayer RTS's.

etc.

You get your entertainment from story/lure, he gets his entertainment from playing with other people online (and prob killing them :p).

If i love racing games and i absolutly love playing racing games online.. I'd get the online racing game.

Also why are you bringing reviews into it, they are just people's opinions.. just like his.

Which is what it seems like the guy discussed in post 1 is doing.

Telling us games without multiplayer can't be good, and that none of them deserve to be ever considered for GOTY...

If i love racing games and i absolutly love playing racing games online.. I'd get the online racing game.

Also why are you bringing reviews into it, they are just people's opinions.. just like his.

Yes you may get that game (as an online fan), but I seriously doubt as a racer genre fan you're going to mouth off the more critically acclaimed title of the two as rubbish and not worthy of GOTY :laugh:

The review scores are relevant as we brought GOTY labeling into this topic - Good games, score well, get noticed, get awards.

But anyway, I'm gonna shutup now - I've discussed this is far too much depth :laugh:

Just one gamers views on things, that's all...

Edited by Audioboxer

while your friend's comment on titles without MP being automatically disqualified from GOTY consideration is a bit over the top, it is a valid assertion. I don't agree with him, but these days MP is certainly expected, and many do consider its omission a major minus.

therefore he's not ignorant, at best he's vehement to the point of being slightly obnoxious. but it's not like he said Mass Effect and Bioshock sucked eggs, he just said they're not good games because they lack MP. this sounds reasonable even to me, and i really don't agree with him.

If you want this kid to shut up, tell him this. He is wrong.

Why, because you cannot judge a game beyond what it contains. If he feels a game shouldn't be judged merely for not having online then he is admitting he cannot appreciate games for what they are.

The instant you tell him he is doing something he believes he is not doing, then he will try to prove you wrong and perhaps actually change if he has any intelligence. If he still needs convincing, then ask him to tell you which games is better of these two.

Super Smash Brothers (original) or Super Mario 64. This will probably be a very hard question to answer considering both were outstanding games. If he answers SM64, then hit with the "But it doesn't have multiplayer" line.

The way I see it is something like Call of Duty 4/Fable/Fallout/Bioshock/Mass Effect doesn't need multi-player as they are story driven.

However something like Street Fighter/Tekken/Mario Kart/Gran Turismo etc. are worthless without multiplayer...

As for myself, I have a hatred of multiplayer games and won't play them online, the only ones I'll play are at a friends house when there is a bunch of us, online they are far too many tw@'s for my taste (in my view about 99.99%) and as a misanthropic person I'd rather not have anything to do with them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This is about the already discredited 2025 announcement. Not the current one, which I've heard nothing negative about in the academic literature.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!