Your Worst Computer


Recommended Posts

Those are not "worst" computer.... All those spec had their time in the sun when they where all fresh and new. By today standard a PII/PIII and even some P4 would be very obsolete (same for AMD CPU and all GPU of the era).

I never had any worst computer in the way that for their time, they all did what they where build for. Never tried to install WinXP on a PII.... Never tried to run Vista on a PIII.... Would be stupid IMO.

By "worst computer" I would say I had a Compaq PC (Athlon64 3200+) that was allot of problem. Badly built, drivers problem, bad support.... That's what I call "worst".

The worst computer that's still in service in my house is actually one of my servers:

Dell Dimension XPS D333

Pentium II 333MHz (Deschutes core)

224MB PC100 RAM

40GB Western Digital + 80GB Maxtor + 8GB IBM/Hitachi hard drives (128GB total space)

8MB ATI Rage Pro graphics

Sound Blaster 16 PCI sound card

Dual 3Com 10/100 NICs

52x32x52 CD-RW drive

Windows 2000 Advanced Server

(in case you couldn't tell, I've modded it a bit...)

The worst (lowest spec'd) one I've ever had:

"Leading Edge" laptop PC:

80386SX 16MHz

640KB of RAM

20MB Hard drive

Floppy Drive

Monochrome display

No sound card

DOS 5.0 (eventually upgraded to 6.22)

The worst machine I've ever had:

Dell Latitude XP 4100C notebook

80486DX4 100MHz

16MB RAM

1.3GB Hard Drive

1MB Western Digital Graphics card

Floppy Drive (no optical drive)

10base-T NIC (on docking station)

Color display

Built-in trackball mouse

No sound card

This machine was terrible because I got it with Windows 98SE on it, and it was always freezing, BSODing and everything of the sort. It was also as slow as molasses in winter, but once I reloaded it with Windows 95 it was better, but then the problems continued, only they were hardware problems this time around. Not buying another Dell laptop anytime soon... I've known too many people that have had problems with them, not to mention proprietary everything (or approximately thereof)...

Sorry about the long post...

"Leading Edge" laptop PC:

80386SX 16MHz

640KB of RAM

20MB Hard drive

Floppy Drive

Monochrome display

No sound card

DOS 5.0 (eventually upgraded to 6.22)

wow, that is old... My friend had a big bulky "laptop" that had 2 external 5.25 drives, and took 6 discs to fully boot it up to Windows 3.1

you make the late 90's seem so long ago...to me they seem like yesterday.

FredEX, interesting story there, HP are pretty sad when it comes to quality control and after sales support.

and glad someone around here still has a working Atari ST...those 16 bits were built to last, for sure.

and glad someone around here still has a working Atari ST...those 16 bits were built to last, for sure.

I don't have it anymore, but I'll never call my Atari 520 ST my worst computer. At the time, I was the only one with colors and sound in my games. I remember playing Sierra Space Quest 3, in the introduction, when Roger wakes up in the shuttle and he say "Where Am I?", wow, digital sound coming out of my Atari!! Everybody else was playing in full CGA 4 colors/beeper or cutting edge guys had EGA/AdLib on their PC...

I remember using PC-Ditto that turned my ST into a very slow IBM-XT, or using GFA-Basic, Deluxe Paint in full colors.... Wow, good times....

I still have a IBM PC-XT 8088 with two 5 1/4" floppy drives and no HDD, and the thing is actually still working while my old Pentium 133 and Pentium 500 boxes have already died. It's just kinda hard to find working 5 1/4" floppy disks now, the only ones still working are a two disk set of Turbo C, so I can still do programming on it! :laugh:

Well, there's a Gateway Pentium II (can't remember how fast...er, slow it is) with 196 MBs (or so) RAM and a 8 GB hard drive sitting in the corner (running Windows XP, no less!). It isn't mine, mind you, but it does occupy the same breathing space as the Stormrider (*my* custom-built rig I put together last December after my old laptop died)...kinda sad. :( Then again, that old Gateway kinda reminds me of a slightly slower version of my first computer: a Dell Pentium II 400 MHz (I don't remember how much RAM it had). I played a *lot* of games online (like Rainbow Six/Rogue Spear and AvP) on that thing, with an equally crappy 28k dial-up connection. Ahhhh, memories. But that old Dell was put out to pasture a couple of years ago (my folks were using it after I got my laptop back in 2001). Actually, that laptop is the crappiest computer I personally own (a Pentium 3 Mobile 850MHz (I think) with 512 MBs of RAM and a 32MB GeForce2 Go video card), but I sure got my money's worth out of it! It lasted for nearly 6 years until the AC cable died on it a little more than a year ago (the laptop itself worked fine, except the batteries had long since bit the dust; it would only run on AC power...). One of these days, I'll have to get it a new cable...it would be nice to have it for trips again... :)

hey truckweb you don't want me to bring my old Amiga into this discussion. that'll show these youngsters how "new" the 360 vs PS3 debate is. Amiga...one of the best pieces of human-made tech i ever used. i can't remember a single time that slab failed me.

hey truckweb you don't want me to bring my old Amiga into this discussion. that'll show these youngsters how "new" the 360 vs PS3 debate is. Amiga...one of the best pieces of human-made tech i ever used. i can't remember a single time that slab failed me.

I only just recently packed my A500 up and put it in storage. :laugh:

GATEWAY mx6453 with 160GB hard drive ati radeon mobile 1150 ..200m chipset

2GB ram

160GB pata 4200 rpm hard drive

Broken hinges on both sides

its a pos really so is the customer support......

its 2 years old this december

edit: and the backlight is already acting up... its dimmer than usual at times

hey truckweb you don't want me to bring my old Amiga into this discussion. that'll show these youngsters how "new" the 360 vs PS3 debate is. Amiga...one of the best pieces of human-made tech i ever used. i can't remember a single time that slab failed me.

Yeap, the Amiga was about the only competition to the Atari at the time. I know that Amiga had better colors/sound than the Atari, but of all the friends that I had (at the time), only 1 had a A500. Everybody else was using a PC, or Tandy 1000SX computers... Even had a friend with a Mac, with the tiny 9" B/W CRT.... What a joke, my Atari could run circle around it. I cannot remember but I think that Sierra did not deliver as many games for the Amiga than they did for the Atari.... King Quest, Space Quest, Police Quest, Larry, ..... Wow, nice games, they don't do it like that anymore.

I have Amiga Forever 2008 Premium Edition here, love to play with it. Fond memory. And I play with PacifiST, to remember my time with the Atari. Got tons of disk images....

It's a real shame that Commodore and Atari could not keep up ( and make many awful mess ). Eventually, I had to trade my Atari for a Tandy 1000TL, it had a 286/8Mhz, 768K of ram and could run DOS and had more software, more games. Games where using the Tandy GFX and sound at that time, giving me 16 colors, 3 beepers and a digital channel...

God I feel old....

Edited by TruckWEB

crashgordon, that doesn't surprise me. you also probably had the West German-made A500, desiged to withstand legions of hardened Soviet armor and the occasional tactical nuke. The fact that most of the people on this forum never even heard of a West Germany should probably tell us something regarding lives and times...

truckweb, it is sad that both Commodore and Atari failed in the home computer market, but they were outmoded. There was no way to survive the PC onslaught. as for your friends not having Amigas, well can i say, glorious Quebec! j/k, both machines were actually not so popular in N America, they had many more of them in Europe.

I guess you can't call it my 'worst computer', but I got a used Dell Latitude c610 computer - and since it was my first laptop, I can't really complain. The screen hinge was loose (which I fixed), and the battery wasn't working, so it was a mobile desktop. Compared to my current laptop, that thing is old. Only problem now is the optical drive isn't working, but I'll see if I can borrow an optical drive from work to atleast reinstall Windows (or Linux)

I had to set up a wired connection for it. Not a problem, but for some reason, I have to wait a few minutes after booting up for the internet to come through.

So I'm not the only one that has this problem - From pressing the power button to desktop (including login time) is about 2 mins. Add another 5 onto that waiting for the NIC to come to life and restore balance!

My worst computer is a P4 2.6GHz, 1GB RAM, 40GB hard drive & GF3 Ti200. It operates as my test server with 2008 installed as a DC and Exchange 2007 atm. Thinking of blowing it away and putting a Citrix solution on there.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!