Macbook Pro vs ...


Recommended Posts

I have been thinking about getting a Macbook for a while now. With the Macbook Pro announcement today, I was expecting to finally go out and get one, but I'm having a hard time justifying the price. I had hoped that the Pro would come with a much heftier graphics card, but I guess they opted for the mainstream. This is my issue, the 2.5ghz Macbook Pro is $2500. I speced out a HP laptop with similar and sometimes better specs and it came out to be almost $800 less.

Here is the HP laptop I speced out, Macbook Pro Equivalent

Am I missing something? I know Mac laptops are usually more expensive, but is it usually this much of a difference?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/
Share on other sites

I would have, but I want to be able to play Warhammer Online at decent settings and have it be playable in heavy RvR.

Decisions.. Decisions..

If you feel your online games are going to be a crucial deal to your computer selection then just go for the more "PC" category.

IMO you pay what you get for, Macbook Pro.

fyi (if you didn't know hp is using DDR2, shouldn't make a big difference but just as a reminder)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589969906
Share on other sites

Personally, I'll never understand the point of gaming on a notebook--especially on ones as thin as the Macbooks.

But the main differences are: sturdier aluminum construction, backlit keyboard, led lcd, dual gpu, ddr3, weight/dimensions, multi-touch trackpad.

I'd rather go with a Macbook as well and run a second display.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589969938
Share on other sites

Mainstream? So the dual gfx cards aren't high-end?

It's not SLI, the dual gfx cards are for battery life. The integrated card handles most day to day activities, then the higher powered card kicks in for gaming/video. They have a similar feature in the new Alienware laptops.

Personally, I'll never understand the point of gaming on a notebook--especially on ones as thin as the Macbooks.

But the main differences are: sturdier aluminum construction, backlit keyboard, led lcd, dual gpu, ddr3, weight/dimensions, multi-touch trackpad.

I'd rather go with a Macbook as well and run a second display.

the weight/dimensions are fairly close and the benefit of ddr3 is negligible. I don't know how huge a difference LED is vs traditional LCD, I'd have to see them side by side.

Gota give it to you tho, the case itself is going to be much sturdier and I love the idea of a backlit keyboard.

The reason I want this thing to play Warhammer is so I can have some entertainment when I'm away from my desktop. It is also nice to lounge around with a laptop and do some casual gaming.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589970026
Share on other sites

but then again, Mac products probably last longer than HP?

Not quite... at least not like they used to (the old PowerPC Macs). Mind you that I have 3 Dell desktops, one from 1999, one from 2002, and one from early 2006 and they are all going strong. I also have a Dell XPS M1530 and the build quality is solid as a rock.

To the original poster: in terms of the bang:buck ratio, you'd get the most value out of the HP. It includes a GeForce 9600M GT 512MB video card and a 64-bit operating system with 4 GB of RAM, which is quite powerful, and for a lot less than the MacBook Pro. If you can, take a look to see what other manufacturers are shipping, like Dell or Lenovo.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589971656
Share on other sites

I run a HP Compaq Business notebook and those are just awesome. Real sturdy.

However .. the consumer line notebooks (which you picked out) aren't as top-notch.

The new Macbook Pro rocks the HP you've chosen.

You could consider the 8530p or 8530w. Both new sturdy HP Compaq notebooks with sturdy build and awesome performance for a reasonable price.

Also they both also have a metallic casing (I believe).

Tough .. I like the look of the new mbp. If only it had a HP keyboard and not have a mirror for a screen.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589974802
Share on other sites

Not quite... at least not like they used to (the old PowerPC Macs).

How so? :huh:

Still, any electronic device, with the proper care, can last years and years. I know many people with 10+ years machines still working strong.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589980952
Share on other sites

Go for dell...I got my m1530 relatively cheap after discounts, etc. It runs really well, and I don't understand the people who have problem with dell, I have eight dells (not all mine, in my extended family that I regularly visit), and they are ALL running great with one exception that was easily fixed, bought from various points in the last 8 years.

We also have a good 5 more other laptops floating around, and none are as sturdy or problem-free as our dells.

Edit: not trying to start a flame war about which company is better, just saying my experience has been very good with Dell.

Edited by quadz0
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589981008
Share on other sites

Well obviously the answer is the MacBook Pro, the gaming part isn't an issue as you can just dual boot with Windows if you really need to. It's all down to personal preference though, a few months back I was out looking for a laptop, I was seriously considering getting a MacBook Pro. However, I found a slightly better spec'ed Windows PC for considerably less money and in the end I went with the Windows PC, as I just couldn't justify paying more (about ~AU$1,000 more and if I wanted Apple Care and Windows on it, it would been even more...) money for a laptop with less features (and as I recently found out, much better built [the Mac that is] :p) but that is just me.

The Mac is the better computer no doubt, but are you willing to burden the extra cost? for me that was the deal breaker (considering the substantial price difference between the PC and similarly spec MacBook Pro).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589981026
Share on other sites

It's not SLI, the dual gfx cards are for battery life. The integrated card handles most day to day activities, then the higher powered card kicks in for gaming/video. They have a similar feature in the new Alienware laptops.

It's actually speculated that it has HybridSLI just because of how similar the performance to other machines that run HybridSLI. I'm not saying it is for sure though.

Edited by Elliott
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589981314
Share on other sites

warhammer has been tested with the new MB (sorry as I don't remember which website) and it runs pretty well.

Edit: see on tuaw

It's nice to see that the Macbook can handle running the game in PvE areas, but it's really the heavy RvR areas that put a lot of stress on the system.

It's actually speculated that it has HybridSLI just because of how similar the performance to other machines that run HybridSLI. I'm not saying it is for sure though.

Yah, after seeing a benchmark of the MBP running Crysis, it looks like the Hybrid SLI is in fact kicking in.

People seem to think that the 9600M GT and 9400M won't work in Hybrid SLI because the 9600M is marked as not supporting Geforce Boost. It is true the card does not support Geforce Boost, but all that means is that it cannot be used to increase the performance of a more powerful Geforce card. In the case of the MBP, the 9600M GT is the primary card and the 9400M takes on part of the load to boost the overall performance.

Nvidia Hybrid SLI

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589983308
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • VS Code 1.123 introduces massive upgrades for persistent AI developer workflows by Paul Hill Microsoft has just released Visual Studio Code 1.123 alongside its annual developer conference, Build 2026. This release, as always, has a heavy focus on advanced AI agent integration and making the built-in browser more robust. Notably, this update brings big sync changes that keep your AI agents persistent across sessions. With this update, VS Code now supports cross-machine syncing for chat histories, touched files, repository contexts, and related PRs via GitHub accounts, tying users even more into Microsoft’s developer ecosystem. This update also introduces the new /chronicle command that allows you to query past sessions using natural language, generate instant standup reports, and get personal productivity insights. Microsoft has also made some improvements to network-dependent operations, it explains: “When a terminal command that is run by a local agent requires access to domains that are not configured as allowed domains, the command is automatically retried inside the sandbox with unrestricted network access. After that, if it still fails, it falls back to unsandboxed execution. This allows network-dependent operations such as git fetch to finish, while keeping filesystem protections in place.” Microsoft has not stopped there; in this update, it also allows developers to drag, drop, and pin multiple agent sessions side-by-side for easy code comparisons in real-time. It also introduces the Research Agent, accessible via /research. This is a read-only, depth-optimized tool that gets data from the web, local codebase, and GitHub to give you a Markdown report on complex APIs or unfamiliar code. Now, let’s talk about the integrated browser and some security enhancements. VS Code 1.123 features enhanced screenshot capture tools that allow for targeted Area Screenshots and Full Page Screenshots to send layout context instantly to AI chat. The address bar has also been revamped, supporting favorite pages and tab management. Finally, on the security front, this update introduces a safety-first two-hour delay on third-party extension auto-updates to safeguard against compromised or buggy releases. This release is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. If you have VS Code, keep an eye out for the update availability notification. If you still don’t have VS Code, you can get it here.
    • I'm hoping with the Surface Pro 12, I can use either USB-C for my Xreal One Pro glasses. With my Surface Pro 11 OLED X Elite, I have to plug them into the top port. The bottom port will power it, but nothing shows on the screen. Maybe it's my setting. When I plug in the glasses, I have it output only to the glasses. So maybe I need to turn on both displays with it in the top port, then switch the glasses to the bottom port and set it to output only to the glasses. And then hopefully Windows remembers the settings for either the top port and bottom port (one of the awesome features of Windows where it remembers the exact configuration when plugging in external monitors.
    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      227
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      60
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!