Macbook Pro vs ...


Recommended Posts

I have been thinking about getting a Macbook for a while now. With the Macbook Pro announcement today, I was expecting to finally go out and get one, but I'm having a hard time justifying the price. I had hoped that the Pro would come with a much heftier graphics card, but I guess they opted for the mainstream. This is my issue, the 2.5ghz Macbook Pro is $2500. I speced out a HP laptop with similar and sometimes better specs and it came out to be almost $800 less.

Here is the HP laptop I speced out, Macbook Pro Equivalent

Am I missing something? I know Mac laptops are usually more expensive, but is it usually this much of a difference?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/
Share on other sites

I would have, but I want to be able to play Warhammer Online at decent settings and have it be playable in heavy RvR.

Decisions.. Decisions..

If you feel your online games are going to be a crucial deal to your computer selection then just go for the more "PC" category.

IMO you pay what you get for, Macbook Pro.

fyi (if you didn't know hp is using DDR2, shouldn't make a big difference but just as a reminder)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589969906
Share on other sites

Personally, I'll never understand the point of gaming on a notebook--especially on ones as thin as the Macbooks.

But the main differences are: sturdier aluminum construction, backlit keyboard, led lcd, dual gpu, ddr3, weight/dimensions, multi-touch trackpad.

I'd rather go with a Macbook as well and run a second display.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589969938
Share on other sites

Mainstream? So the dual gfx cards aren't high-end?

It's not SLI, the dual gfx cards are for battery life. The integrated card handles most day to day activities, then the higher powered card kicks in for gaming/video. They have a similar feature in the new Alienware laptops.

Personally, I'll never understand the point of gaming on a notebook--especially on ones as thin as the Macbooks.

But the main differences are: sturdier aluminum construction, backlit keyboard, led lcd, dual gpu, ddr3, weight/dimensions, multi-touch trackpad.

I'd rather go with a Macbook as well and run a second display.

the weight/dimensions are fairly close and the benefit of ddr3 is negligible. I don't know how huge a difference LED is vs traditional LCD, I'd have to see them side by side.

Gota give it to you tho, the case itself is going to be much sturdier and I love the idea of a backlit keyboard.

The reason I want this thing to play Warhammer is so I can have some entertainment when I'm away from my desktop. It is also nice to lounge around with a laptop and do some casual gaming.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589970026
Share on other sites

but then again, Mac products probably last longer than HP?

Not quite... at least not like they used to (the old PowerPC Macs). Mind you that I have 3 Dell desktops, one from 1999, one from 2002, and one from early 2006 and they are all going strong. I also have a Dell XPS M1530 and the build quality is solid as a rock.

To the original poster: in terms of the bang:buck ratio, you'd get the most value out of the HP. It includes a GeForce 9600M GT 512MB video card and a 64-bit operating system with 4 GB of RAM, which is quite powerful, and for a lot less than the MacBook Pro. If you can, take a look to see what other manufacturers are shipping, like Dell or Lenovo.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589971656
Share on other sites

I run a HP Compaq Business notebook and those are just awesome. Real sturdy.

However .. the consumer line notebooks (which you picked out) aren't as top-notch.

The new Macbook Pro rocks the HP you've chosen.

You could consider the 8530p or 8530w. Both new sturdy HP Compaq notebooks with sturdy build and awesome performance for a reasonable price.

Also they both also have a metallic casing (I believe).

Tough .. I like the look of the new mbp. If only it had a HP keyboard and not have a mirror for a screen.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589974802
Share on other sites

Not quite... at least not like they used to (the old PowerPC Macs).

How so? :huh:

Still, any electronic device, with the proper care, can last years and years. I know many people with 10+ years machines still working strong.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589980952
Share on other sites

Go for dell...I got my m1530 relatively cheap after discounts, etc. It runs really well, and I don't understand the people who have problem with dell, I have eight dells (not all mine, in my extended family that I regularly visit), and they are ALL running great with one exception that was easily fixed, bought from various points in the last 8 years.

We also have a good 5 more other laptops floating around, and none are as sturdy or problem-free as our dells.

Edit: not trying to start a flame war about which company is better, just saying my experience has been very good with Dell.

Edited by quadz0
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589981008
Share on other sites

Well obviously the answer is the MacBook Pro, the gaming part isn't an issue as you can just dual boot with Windows if you really need to. It's all down to personal preference though, a few months back I was out looking for a laptop, I was seriously considering getting a MacBook Pro. However, I found a slightly better spec'ed Windows PC for considerably less money and in the end I went with the Windows PC, as I just couldn't justify paying more (about ~AU$1,000 more and if I wanted Apple Care and Windows on it, it would been even more...) money for a laptop with less features (and as I recently found out, much better built [the Mac that is] :p) but that is just me.

The Mac is the better computer no doubt, but are you willing to burden the extra cost? for me that was the deal breaker (considering the substantial price difference between the PC and similarly spec MacBook Pro).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589981026
Share on other sites

It's not SLI, the dual gfx cards are for battery life. The integrated card handles most day to day activities, then the higher powered card kicks in for gaming/video. They have a similar feature in the new Alienware laptops.

It's actually speculated that it has HybridSLI just because of how similar the performance to other machines that run HybridSLI. I'm not saying it is for sure though.

Edited by Elliott
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589981314
Share on other sites

warhammer has been tested with the new MB (sorry as I don't remember which website) and it runs pretty well.

Edit: see on tuaw

It's nice to see that the Macbook can handle running the game in PvE areas, but it's really the heavy RvR areas that put a lot of stress on the system.

It's actually speculated that it has HybridSLI just because of how similar the performance to other machines that run HybridSLI. I'm not saying it is for sure though.

Yah, after seeing a benchmark of the MBP running Crysis, it looks like the Hybrid SLI is in fact kicking in.

People seem to think that the 9600M GT and 9400M won't work in Hybrid SLI because the 9600M is marked as not supporting Geforce Boost. It is true the card does not support Geforce Boost, but all that means is that it cannot be used to increase the performance of a more powerful Geforce card. In the case of the MBP, the 9600M GT is the primary card and the 9400M takes on part of the load to boost the overall performance.

Nvidia Hybrid SLI

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682470-macbook-pro-vs/#findComment-589983308
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!