Windows 3.11 install with VMWare

By dmd3x
in Microsoft (Windows)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentor

dmd3x

Posted
Posted

I got a bit nostalgic recently and decided to install Windows 3.11 under VMWare. The Windows 3.11 install CD is not bootable (bootable CDs didn't exist back then I'm pretty sure).

I misplaced the original floppy that would have kicked off the Windows 3.11 CD-ROM install, so I tried using my Windows 98 boot floppy disk. It seemed to work OK. After I go through the Windows installation, reboot and try to launch Windows, the Windows for Workgroups 3.11 splash screen comes up and it starts cranking away, but it gives up and says "incorrect DOS version". This leads me to believe that the Windows 98 DOS is not recognized properly by Windows 3.11 because it is newer. Any suggestions?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/682882-windows-311-install-with-vmware/
Share on other sites
Neowinian

shuntsu

Posted
Posted
I got a bit nostalgic recently and decided to install Windows 3.11 under VMWare. The Windows 3.11 install CD is not bootable (bootable CDs didn't exist back then I'm pretty sure).

I misplaced the original floppy that would have kicked off the Windows 3.11 CD-ROM install, so I tried using my Windows 98 boot floppy disk. It seemed to work OK. After I go through the Windows installation, reboot and try to launch Windows, the Windows for Workgroups 3.11 splash screen comes up and it starts cranking away, but it gives up and says "incorrect DOS version". This leads me to believe that the Windows 98 DOS is not recognized properly by Windows 3.11 because it is newer. Any suggestions?

Get a copy of DOS 6.22

Grand Master

PNWDweller

Posted
Posted

Hmmm...I did that once, but don't remember how I did it. It was quite awesome though, from boot to desktop about 5 seconds or less. Makes me think of how much faster xp or vista or 7 will boot 20 years from now on those computers when we are at Windows XXVI or something. :)

Grand Master

+BudMan MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

Here are the other things you will need to get networking and sound and cdrom etc working on your virtual machine

http://vmware0.tripod.com/

Don't plan on surfing many websites though -- most of them don't work with the old browsers anymore ;) And there is a driver you will need to enable 1024x768 as well.. Off the top do not recall where I found that info -- but its easy enough to find, just google it.

post-14624-1224157486_thumb.png

Grand Master

+Frank B. Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
Oh .. I threw up a little bit just looking at that age-old UI again .. how far we've come, and still we whine..

It's all relative. Windows 3.x was pleasant to look at compared to, say, Windows 2.0:

win203misc.gif

Grand Master

MtnDewCodeRedFreak

Posted
Posted

Yup - IE 5 can be installed on Win 3.1x. Sheesh - hard to believe.

Now we're almost on Win 7 Beta with IE 8.

Grand Master

+Frank B. Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
Was IE5 released as 16-bit? :blink:

Yes. IE 5 ran on the following operating systems:

  • HP-UX
  • Solaris
  • Windows 2000
  • Windows 98
  • Windows 95
  • Windows NT 4
  • Windows NT 3.51
  • Windows 3.11

... the latter being a 16-bit version.

There was also a Macintosh version of IE 5 which was based on a different code base, using a different rendering engine.

Grand Master

roadgeek9

Posted
Posted
Was IE5 released as 16-bit? :blink:

Yes, and it's probably the latest web browser (other than Netscape 4) to be 16-bit.

You ain't seen nothing yet. This is one of the colour schemes for Windows 3.11 provided by Microsoft:

<snipped>

That makes my eyes hurt REALLY badly.

Imagine that on a 60 Hz CRT at 640x480x256. :pinch:

what about firefox? 0.0.0.0.01 alpha test?

You mean Netscape?

Grand Master

+Frank B. Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
what about firefox? 0.0.0.0.01 alpha test?

There is no version of Mozilla or Mozilla Firefox which will run on Windows 3.11. 16-bit versions of Netscape up to version 4.x exist however.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Instagram now lets you manually reorder posts on your profile grid

      By David Uzondu · Posted

      Instagram now lets you manually reorder posts on your profile grid by David Uzondu Instagram is finally rolling out the ability to customize your feed layout as you see fit by letting you reorder posts on your profile grid. This feature comes several months after the app introduced a tool that lets users rearrange photos and videos within a carousel post after it has already been published. To do that, people tap the three-dot menu in the top right corner of the post, select the edit option, and reorganize their slides. Now that Instagram has expanded the feature to your profile grid, you can organize your main page without deleting old uploads. To use the new system, you simply tap any picture on your grid and select the option to reorder. This action opens up a separate screen where you can freely drag your grid items around until you get your preferred aesthetic, and then you just hit the back button to save your changes. Instagram's Threads account posted that the system would reach accounts starting this week, so you might need to wait for the automatic update to hit your phone. https://www.threads.com/@instagram/post/DZVV_fyjjSW In other Instagram news, last week, people figured out that if you ask Meta's AI support assistant to hand over any Instagram account, the bot will actually hand it over (even if the victim's account had 2FA enabled). The security exploit involved the assistant accepting prompts from users and generating password reset links for unauthorized email addresses. Meta said that the issue has now been fixed, but this came after the issue affected several high-profile accounts, including @obamawhitehouse. Last month, the company finally rolled out paid subscription tiers for WhatsApp and other Meta social platforms after months of testing. WhatsApp Plus costs $2.99 a month and gives you custom themes, while Instagram Plus and Facebook Plus cost $3.99 a month for extra profile customization and story rewatch counters. Meta's also working on Meta One, a unified subscription service that contains options for heavy users of its servers who want more reach or advanced features. For instance, Meta One Essential ($14.99/mo) comes with a verified badge and impersonation protection. If you pay for Meta One Premium ($19.99/mo), you get deeper AI reasoning tools, whereas the Meta One Advanced ($49.99/mo) tier increases your search placement (on Facebook and Instagram) and visibility.
    • Hi my name is Olivia and I am from Australia

      By cleverclogs · Posted

      Hello mysterious lamborghiniv10, I was in Australia and... now I'm in the Netherlands. 
    • EU says Meta must restore rival chatbots' access to WhatsApp

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      EU says Meta must restore rival chatbots' access to WhatsApp by Hamid Ganji The European Commission has ordered Meta to restore third-party AI chatbots’ access to WhatsApp after the tech giant decided to block them from operating on the popular messaging platform. After Meta banned rival AI chatbots from operating on WhatsApp, the European Commission launched an antitrust investigation to determine whether the company had abused its market dominance. As a result of Meta’s decision, third-party AI chatbots, including Microsoft’s Copilot and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, were prevented from operating on WhatsApp. At the time, Meta said it wanted to reserve the WhatsApp Business API for other types of businesses and did not allow rival chatbots to use it. This effectively prevented the WhatsApp ecosystem from being used to distribute rival chatbot services. However, the European Commission has now announced an interim measures decision requiring Meta to restore access to WhatsApp for rival general-purpose AI assistants on the same terms and conditions as before October 15, 2025. The Commission has also asked Meta to maintain that access until the antitrust investigation is concluded. The Commission argues that Meta has used its dominant market position to prevent rival AI chatbots from accessing the WhatsApp Business API. While Meta allowed rival services to return to WhatsApp by paying a fee, the European Commission still considers that arrangement to be a de facto access ban. According to EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera, the fees introduced by Meta are so high that using WhatsApp is no longer economically sustainable for competitors. “It seems that Meta expects to leverage the vast reach and likely dominance of WhatsApp to benefit its own AI assistant and to foreclose rivals,” Ribera said. “We cannot let large digital incumbents leverage their dominance of the past to dictate who in Europe gets to compete and who gets to innovate in AI.”
    • Save 31% on Samsung T7 Portable SSD

      By +Warwagon · Posted

      A few years ago walmart had the 512 models on clearance for $35. I bought 3 of them. I should have purchased more.
    • Should Microsoft be forced to stop promoting Edge over other browsers?

      By +virtorio · Posted

      I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!