Which OS is most stable?


  

87 members have voted

  1. 1. Which OS is most stable?

    • Win 95/98
      1
    • Linux
      12
    • Win nt
      1
    • Win me
      0
    • Win 2000
      26
    • Win XP
      46
    • BeOS
      0
    • MacOS X
      0
    • FreeBSD
      1


Recommended Posts

Windows 95 = Utter ****

Windows 98 = Was **** too, but was a tad tweaked

Windows 98SE = Much better than 98 and 95, but you would be guarantee to get the occasional crash.

Windows NT = Stable, but lack of support, PNP support, games didnt run.

Windows 2000 = Microsoft does something right for once, everything runs great and has good support now.

Windows XP = The trigger to take over the world :D

  Quote
Originally posted by [Neo] 

...Windows 2000 = Microsoft does something right for once, everything runs great and has good support now.

Some games dont work and music plays with ambience, see a past post.

  Quote

Windows XP = The trigger to take over the world :D

True...can't wait. :)

... don??t misunderstand me.

I love Windows XP and I think it?s the best Operation System M$ ever created. But that doesn?t make it the most stable.

Stablity of M$ OSs:

9x/ME = No need to mention, those aren?t real Systems!

NT 4 = with SP 6a the most STABLE System ever ... especially due to its lack of features. Since most DirectX and 3D stuff simply won?t run they won?t make it crash.

W2k = (alias NT 5.0) High stability and most the features missing in NT4 are included ... but with SP2 it still has some annoying bugs and security holes. Let?s hope for the next service packs.

WXP = (alias NT 5.1) It?s Win2k with a smarter and more colourful GUI and some new features and improvements. But due to to the high integration of the three main components (Eplorer, IE 6 and WMP 8) and the huge ammount of graphical features the GUI isn?t that stable (although the System itself is!). I?m using RC2 [german] at the moment and explorer.exe crashes rather often. And you can create a bleuscreen with a simple twain application. I think WXP is good, but not the most stable!

For other OS ....

Linux is extremly stable and in more than one way far superior to Windows. But since M$ simply has the better software support and is beginning to copy some of the coolest features of the newer Linux distributions and including them into WinXP Windows gets closer verey day ....

BeOS 5 pro is stable .... but only because there are no Apps for it that could make it crash ...

Mac OS ... sorry, never used it ...

Linux is stable, but it doesn't support as many hardware as Windows does.

Windows 2000 is the first stable MS OS ever. I have experiences installing Windows 3.1/95/98/98SE/Me/2000/XP, and Win2k is the first one that didn't give me too much headache after I fresh install it. I am sure most of you know that when you install win98, it often doesn't have the right driver for sound and graphics card. Well, both Win2k/XP recognizes my hardware setting perfectly. Sadly, I cannot install Geforce graphics card on my computer because my Intel graphics card is intergrated on my motherboard. I see a great improvement in Windows XP software compatibility. Many programs that I can't run in Win2k works great in WinXP.

Honestly, I don't think Windows XP is the trigger to take over the world. I think BlackComb is the one becasue of the .Net and HailStorm Technology (or HellStorm :ninja: ) ....I wonder how many people are gonna subscribe to their service when it becomes available to the public. Before MS release these advanced technology, they need to make sure that their central server will never be down like what happend few month ago. Windows Messenger and a buncha Passport things didn't work at that time, and I doubt how stable .Net will be..mmm

I just love it NOT , but my new machine wont run Win 2k , Installs , does the first boot , gets to the w2k screen you know the one , has those little blue squares , then Blank nothing nada

So I am currently stuck with ME and XP

  Quote
Originally posted by hob_se  

wonder why WindowsXP isn't NT version 6...

Windows98 is windows 4 (and abit) and has IE4..

Windows2000 is NT 5 and has IE5..

Do I have to little to thing about?... :s

Windows 95 was Windows 4.0 and had IE 2/3

Windows 98 was Windows 4.1 and had IE 4/5

Windows ME was Windows 4.9 and had IE 5.5

Windows 2000 was NT 5 and had IE 5.01

Windows XP will be NT 5.1 and will have IE 6

Windows Longhorn will probably be NT 5.5 and have IE 6.5

Windows Blackcomb will be NT 6 and probably have IE 7

Windows XP was originally intended to be a minor upgrade for Windows 2000 that was intended for home users as well. Longhorn will probably be NT 5.5 and Blackcomb will be NT 6.0.

  Quote
Originally posted by Stevie  

Hi,

It impossible to run Linux on a separate petition?  I am currently running Windows 2000 and Windows XP.

I have never had any experience with Linux but wouldn't mind giving it a try.

Stevie

You can install Linux on a seperate partition and you can even make a boot flop that boots you to Linux ... remove the flop and you have your standard windows bootmanager again..

Use the flop to prevent Lilo boot from messing up your boot sector

If you want to delete Linux just repartition and your're done

  Quote
Originally posted by MaddogMDD  

Not once was good ol' Windows 3.1 mentioned! :o  

Not that it was stable or anything, but it brings back both good and bad memories.  It was my first OS, back in like 91 or something.

actually, Win 3.1 was pretty stable, but I should point out that it wasn't a real operating system, but rather a gui and multi-tasking add-on for dos..

but someone said they voted for dos, I agree with that :) I vote for dos too :)

Of all the OS's created by Microsoft. The worst has to be Windows Me this is the most crappiest OS i've ever used.

I dont know why they developed it since Windows XP was pretty close to release.

In my rating from least stable to most would be something like this.

1. Windows 95

2. Windows ME

3. Windows 98

4. Windows 98SE

5. Windows NT SP6

6. 2000/XP are about the same :D

The scary thing is Microsoft products are getting better, which means their ultimate goal of taking over the world is getting closer hehe :D

  Quote
Originally posted by [Neo] 

Of all the OS's created by Microsoft. The worst has to be Windows Me this is the most crappiest OS i've ever used.

I dont know why they developed it since Windows XP was pretty close to release.

In my rating from least stable to most would be something like this.

1. Windows 95

2. Windows ME

3. Windows 98

4. Windows 98SE

5. Windows NT SP6

6. 2000/XP are about the same :D

The scary thing is Microsoft products are getting better, which means their ultimate goal of taking over the world is getting closer hehe :D

I agree, except for Win NT4 SP6a, i think that is the MOST stable OS, out of the 6 mentioned.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This super-powerful GaN charger with four ports is 50% off by Taras Buria Some time ago, I reviewed the Cuktech 10, a powerful 100W GaN charger with three ports. It left positive impressions, and since then, it has served me as my primary charger for my phone, watch, laptop, and tablet. Recently, Cuktech offered me the opportunity to take a look at the model 15, a more powerful 140W GaN charger, this time, with four ports. Right now, this powerful charger is available with a massive discount at just $50.99 (with coupon applied). The Cuktech 15 is the same as the Cuktech 10, just slightly bigger, more powerful, and with one extra port. It has a light metallic finish, but overall, it retains the brand's identity and features. The four ports are well spaced out, and the black plastic insert with a cyan rim has a ribbed texture for better grips. Although I live in Europe, Cuktech sent me a US variant with a retractable plug. Okay, I guess. The ability to retract the plug makes it extra portable, which is nice. A high-power 240W five-foot cable is also included. The charger measures 3.11 x 2.56 x 1.26 inches and weighs 0.737 lbs. The Cuktech 15 has four ports: two high-power Type-C ports, one Type-C port with a lower output, and one Type-A port. The first two Type-C ports can deliver a full 140W in single-port mode (PD 3.1 supported), which is nice—no asterisk or caveats here with combined power or something. If you need the full 140W for one device, you get it. Ports are capable of working in the following modes: Single-port Type-C1 / C2: 140W max 5V 2A, 5V 3A, 9V 3A, 11V 6.1A, 12V 3A, 15V 3A, 20V 5A, 28V 5A Type-C3: 33W max 5V 2A, 5V 2.4A, 9V 2A, 12V 1.5A, 11V 3A Type-A: 18W max 5V 2A, 5V 3A, 9V 2A, 12V 1.5A Multi-Port Type-C1 + C2: 100W + 33W or 65W + 65W Type-C1/C2 + Type-C3: 100W + 33W Type-C1/C2 + Type-A: 100W + 18W Type-C1 + Type-C2 + Type-C3: 65W + 60W + 7.5W or 45W + 45W + 18W Type-C1 + Type-C2 + Type-C3 + Type-A: 65W + 60W + 7.5W As you can see, the charger is pretty robust, and it can power two pretty powerful laptops at once and even have enough oomph to charge a smartphone, albeit at a lower power. Another thing worth mentioning is that the Cuktech 15 delivers "clean" power with pretty low pulsations at about 25-50 mV. The rule of thumb is that the lower the pulsations, the better the charger is for your device's battery health. In this area, Cuktech's charger does not disappoint, and they deliver way better results than 100 mV, which is considered a standard for a good charger. Cuktech uses gallium nitride technology, which enables smaller, more powerful and efficient charging. Speaking of efficiency, the charger is rated for 78% average or 64% at a 10% load. When charging at 120W, I received an average of 80-85%, which is good. Of course, when charging at peak power, it gets hot, but not too much. The Cuktech 15 140W usually costs $99.99, which is undoubtedly not cheap. However, right now, you can get it for half the price, which is a very good deal, considering you get a high-quality charger with plenty of ports and very high power output. Like with the Cuktech 10, you cannot go wrong with this one. CUKTECH 15 140W four-port GaN charger - $50.99 | 30% off + a 20% off coupon As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Awesome book, just hope they don't screw up Rocky and the story
    • KDE's KClock is getting Wayland Picture-In-Picture support by David Uzondu The KClock app for KDE Plasma over the years has received a number of updates, like better integration with KRunner and a dedicated background service (kclockd) for managing alarms. Now, it looks like KDE devs want to add something cool: pop-out timers using the new Picture-in-Picture protocol for Wayland. Image: Kai Uwe Broulik This all started from a simple observation. Kai Uwe Broulik, a KDE developer, saw someone using a small timer window during a presentation and thought it was a good idea. The problem is that achieving this kind of "always on top" behavior is handled differently between the old X11 display server and the newer Wayland. With X11, an application could pretty much do whatever it wanted. If a program wanted to draw a drop-down menu, it would just create a borderless window, place it in a specific spot, and grab all user input. Wayland operates on a different philosophy. As Broulik notes, under Wayland, the application describes what it wants, and the compositor gets to decide how to handle it. A drop-down menu is an XDG Popup. The application tells the compositor which button spawned it, and the compositor handles the placement and behavior. This is much more secure and consistent. It also means an application cannot just decide to keep its window on top of everything else. This restriction prevents a web browser from implementing an overlay video player under Wayland. To get around this in a standardized way, a proper Wayland support model for Picture-in-Picture, or PiP, was needed. Enter the xx-pip-v1 protocol. It is a new protocol designed specifically for creating floating PiP windows, and KWin, Plasma's compositor, recently gained support for it. Because it is an experimental protocol, its use is gated behind an environment variable, KWIN_WAYLAND_SUPPORT_XX_PIP_V1. A new protocol is fine for demos, but it needs a real application to find its weaknesses. So Broulik implemented it in KClock. This work allows KClock to offer pop-out timers and even a pop-out stopwatch in a small PiP window. The user could get system-wide options to control where the PiP window appears, or if it appears at all, and have that setting apply to every single application that uses the protocol. You can check out the merge request on GitLab for more technical details about this feature.
    • Nothing of course; it is just a classic syndrome of MAGA pathology.
    • They use it to assessment's in the UK already. Have a friend who said they basically feed response's and prompt during assessment's for many mental health conditions now (essentially tick boxes these days enough ticks and you got it) the AI can prompt questions to ask if its unsure how to score something. It's really good at recognising fractures and broken bones also.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      TIGOSS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      henryj earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      CarolynHelen earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      henryj earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      197
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      164
    4. 4
      Xenon
      81
    5. 5
      Som
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!