Recommended Posts

I already found a VistaGlass :

http://vistastyle.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/vistaglass/ (by mr.google)

but it have a problem found in other VS's too : it links the windows transparency to the taskbar and start menu too. I'd like to have them more transparent, too, but this causes readability problems on certain backgrounds, since they have no glow for text.

I need just a VS thats Aero only with these mods :

- no blur

- change toolbar/menubar color (see near topic)

- transparency when maximized (already done with vistaglazz)

I would like others too but seems a bit to complicated for now.

I already found a VistaGlass :

http://vistastyle.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/vistaglass/ (by mr.google)

but it have a problem found in other VS's too : it links the windows transparency to the taskbar and start menu too. I'd like to have them more transparent, too, but this causes readability problems on certain backgrounds, since they have no glow for text.

I need just a VS thats Aero only with these mods :

- no blur

- change toolbar/menubar color (see near topic)

- transparency when maximized (already done with vistaglazz)

I would like others too but seems a bit to complicated for now.

I saw that theme. That doesn't remove the blur. It only removes the fog and reflections.

I already found a VistaGlass :

http://vistastyle.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/vistaglass/ (by mr.google)

but it have a problem found in other VS's too : it links the windows transparency to the taskbar and start menu too. I'd like to have them more transparent, too, but this causes readability problems on certain backgrounds, since they have no glow for text.

I need just a VS thats Aero only with these mods :

- no blur

- change toolbar/menubar color (see near topic)

- transparency when maximized (already done with vistaglazz)

I would like others too but seems a bit to complicated for now.

Thank you for finding it again for me :)

& yes, that is a problem with Vista Glass - the taskbar & start menu do not look good on white (or some light) backgrounds.

I prefer darker backgrounds anyway ;)

Thank you for finding it again for me :)

& yes, that is a problem with Vista Glass - the taskbar & start menu do not look good on white (or some light) backgrounds.

I prefer darker backgrounds anyway ;)

1.png

And the concept of that fixes that issue. Though it hasn't been done in a theme like that. Only one so far is the one in the picture.

Though that theme doesn't get rid of the blur as some of you have been saying. Just the fog and reflections :( Which is **** easy.

i think i found the answer.

Here ya go:

HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\DWM\ColorizationColor

It's a string value that accepts this format:

AARRGGBB

Lower A value means more transparent (00 = completely transparent, FF = completely opaque).

(similar to HTML hex colors)

So...My guess is you want completely transparent...so how about ColorizationColor = 00000000?

Make sure you restart the Aero User Experience (DWM) using net restart uxsms.

Have fun!

-Yamake

http://www.aeroxp.org/board/lofiversion/index.php?t8924.html

just tried it, and dnt seem to remove the blur.

That 'fix' is exactly what you can do in the Control panel.

the AA in AARRGGBB stands for the Color intensity in the Glass color control panel thingy.

I saw that theme. That doesn't remove the blur. It only removes the fog and reflections.

Looks like i confused those terms (not native english speaker), you're right, I thought about reflections.

Thank you for finding it again for me :)

& yes, that is a problem with Vista Glass - the taskbar & start menu do not look good on white (or some light) backgrounds.

I prefer darker backgrounds anyway ;)

Looks like the dl link is broken.

However, try searching for aero clear, it may give some very similar.

Actually I can get that transparent taskbar & start menu working if I can find out :

- the upper part of the taskbar is more lighter, for 3d effect. how do remove that effect, I mean make the upper part looks like the lower ?

- maintain taskbar and start menu a fixed tranparency, like default aero, but make them more transparent, but not so much as in the themes like vistaglass/clear when you push up max transparency in windows. but how ?

And the concept of that fixes that issue. Though it hasn't been done in a theme like that. Only one so far is the one in the picture.

Though that theme doesn't get rid of the blur as some of you have been saying. Just the fog and reflections :( Which is **** easy.

I was thinking about that glow, but since it isnt available....

You say is very easy to remove the reflections and the fog (fog ?) . How ? I think I can work something out like my liking.

  • 1 month later...

Sorry to bump this but there is a key that disables blur

Create a DWORD in HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\DWM called "HideBlur" and give it a value of 1. then press Ctrl+Shift+F9 twice to restart DWM. tested in old post-beta 2 Vista builds and Win7 6956, i'm assuming it works in every build in between there.

I wonder why people wanted to remove the blur effect. It was there to avoid the distraction of the underlying windows (and its contents) but keeping you aware of what's behind.

I would just stick with the glass blur. Anyone to support my case?

That's exactly the reason why. But I think it would still be nice to be able to adjust the blurring via slider in the classic appearance menu.

Sorry to bump this but there is a key that disables blur

Create a DWORD in HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\DWM called "HideBlur" and give it a value of 1. then press Ctrl+Shift+F9 twice to restart DWM. tested in old post-beta 2 Vista builds and Win7 6956, i'm assuming it works in every build in between there.

1.) That key no longer exists.

2.) Ctrl+Shift+F9 was only in Longhorn/Vista Beta

3.) Since it doesn't work in Vista it too doesn't work in 7.

1.) That key no longer exists.

2.) Ctrl+Shift+F9 was only in Longhorn/Vista Beta

3.) Since it doesn't work in Vista it too doesn't work in 7.

Read again, I tested it myself in Windows 7, it works (both the reg key and ctrl+shift+f9). Haven't tested in WIndows Vista (will test later tonight) but I assume that since it worked before RTM, and it worked after RTM, that it works for RTM as well.

  • 4 months later...
Sorry to bump this but there is a key that disables blur

Create a DWORD in HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\DWM called "HideBlur" and give it a value of 1. then press Ctrl+Shift+F9 twice to restart DWM. tested in old post-beta 2 Vista builds and Win7 6956, i'm assuming it works in every build in between there.

It's only in interim builds. It's a debugging "feature".

  • 11 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!