Xbox 360 NXE hard drive install chart established


Recommended Posts

I was going to have a reply to this, but everybody else to care of it for me.

The point is, even if the differences are small in some games now, developers can cater and build their games with HD installs in mind now. Not sure how that all works out but if they know its available, I bet they can really cut times down in the future.

Just because it doesn't matter now, doesn't mean it won't in the future.

No they can't

Since the HDD "install" is just making an image file of theDVD and putting it on the disk and loading from that. and games disks still need to be optimized for loading from DVD first and oremost, not optimized for being used as an image file.

The only way to really make it "faster" is to NOT use the features the 360 API/Devkits gives the developers for fast loading from the disk, like streaming and using the cache. So asically you can "optimize" it for the HDD by making the disk loading slower, but it doesn't really affect the disk loading at all.

The games that load faster they either don't use the cache, or they one one time long loadings for a very large region/map where the icnreased speed of the HDD helps as bit. But then you have other games that do use all the eatures the 360 has for speeding up loading times such as Halo, where it's actually slower on the HDD.

Guys, if you think HDD installs are useless, you must enjoy your 360 sounding like a jet that's about to take off. I do not. Less wear and tear on the DVD drive alone will be worth it, especially on games you play a lot.

This :D

My favourite feature of NXE so far haha.

Makes me want a bigger hard drive, but am I hell paying for a hard drive at the price they are at. Think I might do that hard drive mod when I have some spare cash about.

When I was at Circuit City yesterday, I saw that they had the 120GB drive in-stock for $139.99. Still a little too much for me though. They had the 20GB drives for $79.99. I'd rather have the 120GB drive though. Can't really say if I want to pay that much for a drive.

No they can't

Since the HDD "install" is just making an image file of theDVD and putting it on the disk and loading from that. and games disks still need to be optimized for loading from DVD first and oremost, not optimized for being used as an image file.

The only way to really make it "faster" is to NOT use the features the 360 API/Devkits gives the developers for fast loading from the disk, like streaming and using the cache. So asically you can "optimize" it for the HDD by making the disk loading slower, but it doesn't really affect the disk loading at all.

The games that load faster they either don't use the cache, or they one one time long loadings for a very large region/map where the icnreased speed of the HDD helps as bit. But then you have other games that do use all the eatures the 360 has for speeding up loading times such as Halo, where it's actually slower on the HDD.

Not saying your wrong, but devs will find a way to optimize this process in the future. Maybe not a huge leap, but like you said optimize it first for the DVD and move onto at least making sure it isn't slower with it installed to HD. :p

I think a few people in this thread have major ego problems that they've only got 20GB hard drives.

Look at it from this point of view, if only from this point of view. The XBOX 360 is well known to have a huge amount of issues including heat and laser issues. Less use of the DVD-Rom drive will lower internal system heat, if only by one or two degrees Celsius, and also your laser is going to last a LOT longer.

I'm playing Mirrors Edge at the moment, I've just done the first level twice, Once on DVD and once on HDD. The game occasionally "hiccups" when playing on the DVD Drive, when playing on the hard drive it was a lot more fluid.

Gears of War 2 has the best example though, no more pop-on-textures :p

You disc is more likely to get scratched from being inserted and removed every time you play, then if you were to just leave it in.

And why would you take it off? There's no difference.

It works the same exact way, except that loading is done from the HDD and not from the DVD.

to me its not about the time it takes to load a game. I am playing fable 2 and hdd install is great. Without hdd install, to travel from one area to another, it used to take 5-6 seconds to load but after I installed it to hdd, all the areas loads up instantly. So basically only loading I see is when I boot the game. After that it only take maximum 2 secs when I travel from one area to another.

I think a few people in this thread have major ego problems that they've only got 20GB hard drives.

Look at it from this point of view, if only from this point of view. The XBOX 360 is well known to have a huge amount of issues including heat and laser issues. Less use of the DVD-Rom drive will lower internal system heat, if only by one or two degrees Celsius, and also your laser is going to last a LOT longer.

I'm playing Mirrors Edge at the moment, I've just done the first level twice, Once on DVD and once on HDD. The game occasionally "hiccups" when playing on the DVD Drive, when playing on the hard drive it was a lot more fluid.

Gears of War 2 has the best example though, no more pop-on-textures :p

I still get Pop-on-Textures or atleast fading quality textures in Gears 2.

lol @ the war.

TJ, I understand what you are saying, but you must understand that while the advantages don't seem all that great to you, they do to a lot of other people. Try it, you might like it.

And be honest, you are more likely to do something else during an install than a loading screen, there's no real logic there.

What loading screen in LO takes 40 seconds? I played it quite a bit and don't remember an instance of loading going more than 10 or 15.

The only reason that 40 minutes isn't "gaming time" is because you're installing a game to the HDD, were you not installing it you would be playing. That 40 minute install time is longer than the total loading time while playing therefore it's useless.

You still lose total minutes of play time either way, but I'm pretty sure you lose MORE total minutes of play time if you use the install feature. It's pretty simple mathematics.

half life 2, loading screens 40 seconds right on the site. The annoying hiccups on the inventory screen in fable 2 add up quickly. Mass Effect and Oblivion loading times are even more examples. Especially when they recache data from one local to another.

you still dont understand nongaming time.

were you not installing it you would be playing. That 40 minute install time is longer than the total loading time while playing therefore it's useless.

I would not be using that time to play the xbox. I just stated, I would be doing other things around the house. Not every second of free time is game time. I would be multi-tasking, its a new revolutionary time managing system. Where as I would be installing it games off the disc while reading/watching television/cooking dinner/laundry/vacuuming/cleaning/surfing the web/replying to posts about "game time" etc.

I don't know if it's much of clue on how to start games, BUT.

Most likely the trick is to have a disc that has multiple security ID's attached to them, so you would only need one disc in.

Mostly for modded console people, and it's just a theory.

I have created a disc that has all most if not all content removed that has just the security ID so that the game can launch, but it doesn't work.

So I'm guessing either I removed something important, or that the disc needs to be the same size.

like someone previously mentioned, i don't understand why everyone is making such extreme arguments over an optional feature. you don't have to install all your games and don't need to avoid the feature completely to save the install time (hit install before you go to sleep ffs). personally, i play COD4 more than anything else, so i'll probably just install that one game since i only have a 20GB drive.

Guys, if you think HDD installs are useless, you must enjoy your 360 sounding like a jet that's about to take off.

Rubbish. If that's the case you must have the console in a very dirty and dusty place. My 360 is as quiet as the TV itself. I can barely hear anything running inside it. The only thing I hear is the game and sound effects that my 360 outputs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • While I agree with all that, it just proves there's an a** built for every seat.
    • Lol are you mad because I'm not using AI? I'd rather pay people than lose a bunch of potential customers and get humilated because I used AI. A lot of people won't purchase a game if it used AI during development.
    • LibreWolf 152.0-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. LibreWolf 152.0-1 changelog: Upstream release, see the Firefox 152.0 Release Notes Notable changes: The AppImages are now built on Codeberg along with the other releases We have decided to wait a bit longer to enable the settings redesign, due to use being aware of multiple upstream issues Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • hahahahah wow hahahah you sure got me there hahahahahah, you know that bad performance is always due to poor optimization by the developers, right???
    • "I know for a fact I'll never own one of these." This is why choice is better than government regulation. Globaly Android has something like 72% of the smartphone market. Granted the vast majority of that is low end phones. Apple can and should charge whatever they want. The market will decide if it is too much.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      560
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!