[Review] 15-inch MacBook Pro (Late 2008)


Recommended Posts

So, my girlfriend and I went on vacation this weekend and decided that it would be fun to take the bus practically from one end of the province to the other. I'm a bit of a geek, so I wound up dragging my notebook with me, and sure enough I couldn't stand to go longer than an hour without opening it up. So, I decided to write a review of my MacBook Pro to kill the time, and now that I am home I thought I would post it here for all of you to read. Take it easy, it's my first review. ;)

=================================================

On October 14, 2008, Apple refreshed their line of portable notebooks, bringing a much needed overhaul especially to the design of the MacBook Pro, which has been using the same style casing as the PowerBook G4 which preceded it, and in the process upgraded many of the components inside of not only the MacBook Pro, but its little brother, the MacBook, and the MacBook Air as well.

The packaging was very well thought out in, cutting down on not only the amount of packaging materials used but on the size of the packaging as well, so that more units can be shipped in the same amount of space, reducing Apples overall carbon footprint.

If you have seen the previous generation MacBook Pro product packaging, you will know that the unit shipped in a large black box, and inside you would find the computer and the accessories buried between two large pieces of Styrofoam; while this approach protects the product inside, it isn?t the most environmentally friendly packaging (and Styrofoam is known to crumble and fall apart, and takes a long time to break down).

With the new packaging, the first thing you will notice when you open the box is that the packaging is very minimalist and clean. On the inside, there is a block of foam padding adhered to the top of the packaging, much like that found in the packaging for the MacBook Air and the iPhone as well. The MacBook Pro sits on top of a recyclable plastic tray, with a pull tab that allows you to easily remove the computer from the packaging. With the computer out of the way, you simply lift the plastic tray out of the box and you will be presented with the software media and user guides (?Everything Mac,? which is the user guide for the MacBook Pro, and ?Everything Else,? which has the warranty documentation, the power specifications, and the software installation discs).

If you are familiar with the earlier generation MacBook Pros, you will know how many pieces made up the overall case, including the top and bottom case assemblies. The process of upgrade the hard drive, clean the fans, or service the machine overall, it involved what seemed like to many as open heart surgery and involved practically disassembling the entire computer; and even then when the casing was reassembled there was a chance that the casing wouldn?t be put back in place, in the end there would usually be some gaps between the top and bottom casing, and there were a lot of screws involved (not only that, but there were different sizes, of both Phillips and Torx).

With the new MacBook Pro, Apple really stepped up to the plate and provided the most convenient enclosure to date. To access the hard drive or the battery, you simply press the release switch on the bottom of the computer and lift the cover off, inside you will find the battery (which has also been redesigned) and the hard drive, both of which have convenient pull tabs, no longer do you need to pry the hardware out of the casing.

Upgrading the memory is almost as easy; to do so you simply remove a few screws from the upper cover plate and remove the cover, where you will find the slots for the memory modules. You also gain access to the logic board, the fans, and other internal components (however, I would not recommend servicing these components yourself as it would void the AppleCare warranty, should you need any servicing done you should always contact AppleCare or an Apple Authorized Service Provider; although it will be useful to clean out the fans using a can of compressed air instead of paying a service technician to do the same thing.)

How did Apple come up with the new manufacturing process? Well, when they set out to create the MacBook Air they needed to create an enclosure that was not only light, but extremely thin, and it would not be feasible to use multiple layers of aluminum like in the MacBook Pro, and a thin layer of plastic would be brittle and easy to break. So, Apple created a new manufacturing process, which starts with a solid block of aluminum. With this process, the end product is one piece that is extremely rigid and solid, there?s less chance for failure.

What better than to bring this manufacturing process to the MacBook and the MacBook Pro, which brings the same rigidity and solid construction to the two most popular notebooks that Apple has to offer. The difference is quite noticeable compared to the previous generation MacBook Pro; you can pick up the new model with one hand at the edge and there is no flex or bend to the entire computer, it is very impressive.

The new MacBook and MacBook Pro both feature environmentally friendly materials, not only is aluminum extremely recyclable, but Apple now uses PVC-free plastics even with the internal cabling, brominate-free flame retardants and arsenic-free glass; the MacBook Pro also earned a rating of EPEAT Gold for 2008, which is very impressive. In a day and age where we need to be conscious about what is contained in the products that we use, Apple is taking some great strides and it makes me proud to use Apple products.

Apple also decided to make a few other changes to the MacBook Pro, which have a few users up in arms. One of these changes involve the screen, previous models offered both matte and glossy options; the new model only offers glossy, however it isn?t the traditional glossy coating that you?ve seen on the previous generation products. Instead, the glossy coating on the MacBook Pro is one sheet of glass, exactly like what is used on the iMac, and it looks very impressive.

Some have complained about the glossy display and that the reflections can be very distracting, but in all honestly I haven?t encountered any situations where the glossy screen is distracting to my work (I have used this computer in different lighting conditions in a bedroom, a kitchen, a living room, on a bus driving down the highway, and at my workplace where practically the entire ceiling is composed of nothing but fluorescent tubes). I usually have the brightness set to 3 bars above being off and it?s fine, in brightly lit areas where the sunlight may reflect off the screen I find that having the screen set to one half brightness is good; I haven?t been met with any situation that requires that I have the screen set to full brightness, which is so bright that it is almost blinding.

One reason why Apple chose glass on the display of the new model MacBook and MacBook Pro is the ability to add some structural rigidity to the display itself, meaning it is extremely solid; even when applying pressure to the back of the display there is absolutely no distortion to the image displayed on the panel.

During the announcement of the new MacBook Pro, it was mentioned that the new screen makes colors ?pop," and I have to agree, colors are very rich and blacks are very deep, my previous MacBook Pro had a matte screen and I don?t miss it at all.

Another change in the MacBook Pro is that the FireWire 400 port has been removed, leaving only one FireWire 800 port. I don?t use FireWire at all (all of my devices, including an external hard drive, a camera, and a camcorder, are all using USB 2.0), so this doesn?t bother me at all. For those of you who need FireWire 400, you can simply buy a FW800-to-FW400 conversion cable.

On the 13-inch Aluminum MacBook, there is no FireWire port at all, which leads me to believe that Apple will be phasing it out within the next year or two. Previously, you could use the Migration Assistant with a FireWire cable to migrate from one Mac to another, however with FireWire missing from the MacBook and only FireWire 800 present on the MacBook Pro, Apple has made a change to the Migration Assistant so that you can use an Ethernet cable to move your data. One thing that you won?t be able to do without FireWire though is booting the computer in Target Disk Mode which is a bit of a downfall, but it?s not like you?re going to use that feature every day.

The keyboard backlighting is much improved over previous MacBook Pro models, with less light leakage and better illumination of the actual letters on the keyboard. One change that has been inspired by the MacBook Air is the use of a plastic keyboard where the keys are actually embossed into the computer enclosure (this is commonly referred to as the ?chicklet? or ?pill? style) with a black background and white letter color scheme, which provides a lot better contrast compared to the silver keyboard on previous models; in my opinion this keyboard is a lot easier to type on compared to my older MacBook Pro, as my fingers used to ?catch? on the corners of the keys and it felt as if the keys were going to pop off, whereas with the new model my fingers glide across the keys with ease.

In February of 2008, when Apple updated the MacBook Pros, they introduced multi-touch gestures to the trackpad, simplifying things like page navigation in Safari and other common tasks. With the latest model, this has been upgraded to include four-finger gestures, which allows you to use Expos? to show all windows or show the desktop (this saves quite a bit of time), you can pinch to zoom in on documents and web pages, and you can rotate entire pages or pictures, all with the trackpad. It?s very sleek and impressive.

Besides the updated gestures, Apple has also decided to remove the dedicated trackpad button, instead the trackpad is now one entire touch sensitive button, and it?s made out of glass (it doesn?t look like it, but it really is). The response from the trackpad is very precise and your finger will glide across it with ease, and if you?ve used a Mac before you?ll have no problems getting used to not having a button to click; when I first set up the computer, I clicked on the trackpad just like I did with my old MacBook Pro without even noticing the difference of there being no button.

Now, across the entire MacBook lineup, Apple have decided to use the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M chipset, which also includes an integrated graphics solution that uses 256MB of the installed DDR3 memory, and overall the chipset is very impressive with a high level of performance and stability. This lowers the gap between the three MacBook products as far as performance.

The MacBook Pro that I chose has a 2.4 GHz processor (specifically, it is an Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, which has 3MB of L2 cache, a 1066 MHz front-side bus, and uses 25W of power), 2 GB of DDR3 1066 MHz memory, a 250 GB 5,400-rpm hard drive, and in addition to the GeForce 9400M integrated graphics processor, the MacBook Pro also includes a discrete GeForce 9600M GT, this model ships with 256MB of GDDR4 video memory for added performance.

There are several reasons why I chose this model, primarily it provides all the speed and storage that I require; a few extra megahertz and more L2 cache wouldn?t be very noticeable for the tasks that I perform and the extra 2 GB of DDR3 memory would be overkill. Also, this model is more power efficient as it uses a 25W TDP processor whereas the 2.53GHz and 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processors have a power usage of 35W.

One of the reasons why I bought my previous generation MacBook Pro was because of the discrete graphics processor that it provided (GeForce 8600M GT), however I find that even the GeForce 9400M in this new model is more than adequate for most tasks and performs quite well. I really haven?t found a need to use the GeForce 9600M GT as the applications that I use don?t really use it to its fullest potential, and I don?t play any games or use Boot Camp.

The 250 gigabyte hard drive is more than enough for my use. Two of the biggest storage uses on my computer would be my photo library and my music library (~ 2.7 GB in JPEGs in the iPhoto Library and 9.07 GB of AAC files in iTunes respectively). I did decide to reinstall Mac OS X about a week after I received the computer simply to remove the unneeded languages (as I didn?t feel like using unsupported tools like Monolingual or Xslimmer to remove them), so with all of my data in place I am using about 34 GB of the 232.57 GB that is available when the disk is formatted (don?t you just love it that hard drive manufacturers still get away with using incorrect terminology and twisting numbers?)

As far as battery life, I find that it is very good and it matches the expectations that Apple have set out in their marketing material. When using the GeForce 9400M integrated graphics processor and standard energy saver settings with Bluetooth and Airport (Wi-Fi) turned on while performing some web browsing, writing e-mails and instant messaging with iChat, along with some light graphic editing in Pixelmator and writing code in TextMate or documents in iWork ?08 with the screen brightness set to one half, the battery lasts for around 5 hours and 15 minutes, and when watching movies, the battery lasts for about 3 hours and 45 minutes, enough to watch two full-length feature films. While using the GeForce 9600M GT discrete graphics processor, the battery lasts for around 4 hours and 50 minutes performing common tasks and 3 hours and 10 minutes when watching movies, respectively.

Apple have also improved the internal layout of components and the amount of heat that is produced by these components has also been reduced. With the previous model MacBook Pro, the bottom of the computer would become quite hot, especially when using the computer on your lap; this isn?t a problem with the latest MacBook Pro especially when using the integrated graphics processor. The bottom of the unit does become slightly warm when using the discrete graphics processor, but it comes nowhere near to the amount of heat that the previous models used to produce.

These models no longer come with any trial software at all, neither pre-installed from the factory or on the installation media which is an excellent touch because you don?t need to reinstall the operating system when you pull the computer out of the box just to remove the trial software. Previously, I?d find myself reinstalling the software on any Mac when setting it up out of the box to fully remove the trial software that was installed (for example, Office for Mac 2004 and Aperture). This makes it a lot easier to get up and running.

In conclusion, the MacBook Pro (Late 2008) overall is an excellent product that performs well right when you take it out of the box and is one of the best tools you will ever own, I absolutely love it and I can sUnboxing Photos!s to come.

========================================

Unboxing Photos!

3084614773_ebf84a852f.jpg?v=0

3084618303_a5a5ff6937.jpg?v=0

3085454224_ba8a2062ee.jpg?v=0

3084616685_f01769cec3.jpg?v=0

3084619121_497765bb98.jpg?v=0

3085458380_57c2f4f85c.jpg?v=0

3084620511_a850279d30.jpg?v=0

3084621441_ac08292220.jpg?v=0

Workstation Photos

3085498100_4be99d61db.jpg?v=0

3085483802_ac35fc3093.jpg?v=0

3085483090_4143599606.jpg?v=0

3085477934_2b410c936d.jpg?v=0

3085476944_6509120b64.jpg?v=0

Edited by Mercellus
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/697736-review-15-inch-macbook-pro-late-2008/
Share on other sites

good review (was a bit of a long read but still good :))

Thanks! I was bored, that's actually the second revision of it (the first one didn't make much sense at all, it was too scattered). I'm hoping to do more reviews in the future though so I guess I have to start somewhere!

This was a well written but a slightly biased review. You seem to agree with everything Apple has done... which I find very odd.

No Firewire 400? Huge problem for me. My iPod is firewire 400 but my external harddrive is 800. On my current MBP I can plug in both at the same time. With the new one, not only do I have to lug an external adapter with me but I can only plug in one at a time.

No matte screen? Another huge problem. Glossy screens are good for video and 3D rendering... as for graphics design or any sort of design they are moot.

I don't understand how you are not having problems with the screen as I am having problems with it even at the Apple store. I have used my friend's macbook pro (late 2008) for a while and I just couldn't stand the glare and reflection (mostly of my face) wherever I go. Another huge problem for the new macbooks is if you tilt the base any higher than 45degrees, the screen collapses down. I nearly dropped the new MBP when that happened. Try it, open your MBP, tilt the MBP to abouy 60-90 degrees, your screen will fall down. This is a huge issue for in bed users like me (I like to type and chat late at night in bed...so sue me :D)

Magnet isn't strong enough for the latch. I feel that the magnet isn't strong enough for the latch to have that extra closed feeling. Probably just a personal issue but I like the button on my early 08 macbook pro.

On a side note, light leakage from the keyboard is perfectly fine. It defines the keys.. so you can easily see where you are typing. I don't know why people are flustered about this.

Not to say that your review is bad or anything but this is a pro laptop, and it seems that they're marketing it towards no pro users. What do you do on this computer if I may ask?

And as for the heat, have you tried running a game or 3D simulation software to see how how it usually gets? My early 08 Macbook pro is nice and cool surfing the internet / typing / coding but once you boot up Warcraft 3 it gets to 80 degrees... (this is when i turn the fan to 6000RPM and watch it go back down to 50)

My perfect laptop upgrade would be (in a few years, my early 08 has lots of life in it still):

Macbook pro Unibody design

1920x1200 15.4 Matte Screen

4gigs of DDR3 1066mhz ram

500 gb HD or 256 gb SSD

All the ports of the MBP early 08 design

Blu ray super drive

2.66ghz Core i7 with Montevina platform

nVidia GTX290m graphics chip with a 9400m chipset

10.6 Snow Leopard preinstalled

Edited by wankey
No Firewire 400? Huge problem for me. My iPod is firewire 400 but my external harddrive is 800. On my current MBP I can plug in both at the same time. With the new one, not only do I have to lug an external adapter with me but I can only plug in one at a time.

Like I said, I don't use FireWire, and I don't have any FireWire devices, everything that I own uses USB 2.0 - from my iPhone, my iPod, my external hard drive, my camera and camcorder, etc.

No matte screen? Another huge problem. Glossy screens are good for video and 3D rendering... as for graphics design or any sort of design they are moot.

I had a matte screen previously, and quite honestly I find that the color is a lot better than on the previous MacBook Pro.

I don't understand how you are not having problems with the screen as I am having problems with it even at the Apple store. I have used my friend's macbook pro (late 2008) for a while and I just couldn't stand the glare and reflection (mostly of my face) wherever I go.

Again, to my eyes the screen looks perfectly fine, there's a reflection but that happens with any glossy screen, it's not overpowering on the MacBook Pro like it is on other notebooks.

Another huge problem for the new macbooks is if you tilt the base any higher than 45degrees, the screen collapses down. I nearly dropped the new MBP when that happened. Try it, open your MBP, tilt the MBP to abouy 60-90 degrees, your screen will fall down. This is a huge issue for in bed users like me (I like to type and chat late at night in bed...so sue me :D)

I use my MacBook Pro either on a desk, a table, or on my lap when I am sitting in the proper position, I don't have the notebook tilted at all at any time.

Magnet isn't strong enough for the latch. I feel that the magnet isn't strong enough for the latch to have that extra closed feeling. Probably just a personal issue but I like the button on my early 08 macbook pro.

The 17" MacBook Pro had a similar issue where the hinge had some trouble holding the display up without any movement, it's probably because of the glass adding a slight bit of weight to the display.

On a side note, light leakage from the keyboard is perfectly fine. It defines the keys.. so you can easily see where you are typing. I don't know why people are flustered about this.

There is some light around the actual keys themselves but it's not nearly as bad as what it was on earlier generations, I agree with you that it does indeed define the keys.

Not to say that your review is bad or anything but this is a pro laptop, and it seems that they're marketing it towards no pro users. What do you do on this computer if I may ask?

Programming, graphics design, some 3D design work, web browsing & email, instant messaging, listening to music, watching movies, editing videos in iMovie and editing photos in iPhoto (soon going to pick up a copy of Aperture and take things to the next level).

And as for the heat, have you tried running a game or 3D simulation software to see how how it usually gets? My early 08 Macbook pro is nice and cool surfing the internet / typing / coding but once you boot up Warcraft 3 it gets to 80 degrees... (this is when i turn the fan to 6000RPM and watch it go back down to 50)

My previous MacBook Pro got really hot as soon as you did anything with it, including simple coding in a text editor, and it was if you were using a portable egg cooker when using any other graphics intensive program or using the iTunes visualizer; this doesn't happen at all with the new MacBook Pro.

The late 2008 MacBook Pro isn't for everyone, keep in mind that when purchasing a computer you should always look at your specific needs before making any decisions. For most though, I think this new model is more than adequate. Thanks for your comments, I appreciate it! :)

Also, to those wanting pictures, I'll upload them in a little bit.

My perfect laptop upgrade would be (in a few years, my early 08 has lots of life in it still):

Macbook pro Unibody design

1920x1200 15.4 Matte Screen

4gigs of DDR3 1066mhz ram

500 gb HD or 256 gb SSD

All the ports of the MBP early 08 design

Blu ray super drive

2.66ghz Core i7 with Montevina platform

nVidia GTX290m graphics chip with a 9400m chipset

10.6 Snow Leopard preinstalled

You sure you don't need a nuclear missile with that? :whistle:

Seriously though, all those options would make the notebook more expensive then it already is, increases it weight, size and heat output, totally ruining the entire idea of a Macbook.

But yes, there is nothing wrong in craving for it in dream world.

Well most of it is easily doable. 500 gig HDD is already on the market (in a few year probably will drop price to current 250gigs) bluray super drive is already doable. The 2.66ghz core i7 mobile we'll have to see just how good it is. More ports on the MBP? I'm sure Apple will find a way to do this. But as things are going right now, everything is moving to Usb so I wouldn't mind some more USB 3.0 ports...

Snow Leopard will be available soon. The GTX290m GPU is coming out next year along with a 9400m refresh.

A 1920x1200 15.4 matte screen has been around for ages (circa 2005) so I dunno why they don't put it in their MBPs...

Good things are coming to laptops!

A 1920x1200 15.4 matte screen has been around for ages (circa 2005) so I dunno why they don't put it in their MBPs...

Personally I don't think I would want to use a 1920x1200 resolution on a 15.4" display again, I've tried this once and even after spending close to a month trying to get used to it I found that it strained my eyes too much and I would have to be practically glued to the display to see anything, and when watching standard definition DVD movies any closer than half way across the room you could clearly see distortion and pixelation. Once we have some resolution independence this may all change, but for now, 1440x900 is pretty good.

Personally I don't think I would want to use a 1920x1200 resolution on a 15.4" display again, I've tried this once and even after spending close to a month trying to get used to it I found that it strained my eyes too much and I would have to be practically glued to the display to see anything, and when watching standard definition DVD movies any closer than half way across the room you could clearly see distortion and pixelation. Once we have some resolution independence this may all change, but for now, 1440x900 is pretty good.

I would personally be all over it...... that's the only thing I don't like about my macbook pro

anyone with a new (late 2008) MBP could you please tell me if the firewire chipset is made by TI (Texas Instruments) or Agere. I think you can check by doing a command + v or command + s during startup....i hope to god its still the TI chipset or else no musician would invest in a mac

Just so you know Firewire isn't being phased out and you won't see it disappear from MacBook Pros in the future. On the consumer level FireWire isn't as popular as most users aren't transferring lots of data over long periods of time. So USB 2.0 is just fine for that, however on the pro level such as the film industry we use firewire for lots of stuff. Where we need fast transfer rates over a long period of time instead of just a burst that USB can do. The MacBook Pro and Mac Pro are Pro-Grade products used by professionals where as the MacBook is only used by individuals and some business cases where they don't need something high end.

anyone with a new (late 2008) MBP could you please tell me if the firewire chipset is made by TI (Texas Instruments) or Agere. I think you can check by doing a command + v or command + s during startup....i hope to god its still the TI chipset or else no musician would invest in a mac

Just checking through the Console and it looks like it's utilizing an Agere/Lucent FireWire chip, however I believe the previous model (Early 2008) used this chipset as well.

Just so you know Firewire isn't being phased out and you won't see it disappear from MacBook Pros in the future. On the consumer level FireWire isn't as popular as most users aren't transferring lots of data over long periods of time. So USB 2.0 is just fine for that, however on the pro level such as the film industry we use firewire for lots of stuff. Where we need fast transfer rates over a long period of time instead of just a burst that USB can do. The MacBook Pro and Mac Pro are Pro-Grade products used by professionals where as the MacBook is only used by individuals and some business cases where they don't need something high end.

with USB3 coming I wouldn't be surprised to see firewire phased out unfortunately. It was better than USB2 but since it hasn't been updated in so long....

with USB3 coming I wouldn't be surprised to see firewire phased out unfortunately. It was better than USB2 but since it hasn't been updated in so long....

What are the specs of USB 3 compared to FireWire 800? I just don't see Apple phasing out Firewire atleast not as soon as next year when the film industry is such a big player in buying their products. All the cameras we use <except the film cameras of course> have Firewire.

What are the specs of USB 3 compared to FireWire 800? I just don't see Apple phasing out Firewire atleast not as soon as next year when the film industry is such a big player in buying their products. All the cameras we use <except the film cameras of course> have Firewire.

Directly from Wikipedia

USB 3.0

On September 18, 2007, Pat Gelsinger demonstrated USB 3.0 at the Intel Developer Forum. The USB 3.0 Promoter Group announced on November 17, 2008 that version 1.0 of the specification has been completed and is transitioned to the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF), the managing body of USB specifications. This move effectively opens the spec to hardware developers for implementation in future products. The technology will provide a maximum bandwidth of 5.0 Gb/s (625 MB/s), and with the possibility for an optical interconnection.

USB 3.0 will remain backwards compatible with USB 2.0 as far as the Type A connector is concerned. While USB 2.0 is based on uni-directional data flow with negotiated directional bus transitions, USB 3.0 supports simultaneous bi-directional data flows through the use of dual-simplex four-wire differential signal wiring as compared to half-duplex two wire differential wiring in USB 2.0. Other interesting innovations in USB 3.0 include new power management features that support idle, sleep and suspend states.[29] The two new differential pairs make the cable about as thick as an Ethernet cable and provide full-duplex transfers.[30]

According to electronicdesign.com cables will be limited to 3 m at full speed. The technology is similar to PCI Express 2.0 (5-Gbit/s). It uses 8B10B encoding, linear feedback shift register (LFSR) scrambling for data, spread spectrum. It forces receivers to use low frequency periodic signaling (LFPS), dynamic equalization, and training sequences to ensure fast signal locking.[citation needed]

USB 3.0, which will be called USB SuperSpeed in commercial devices, is expected to be available in commercial controllers in the second half of 2009. Consumer products are expected to become available in 2010.[31]

There is ... a lot. :(

Light leakage from where, actually around the keys not just through the letters/numbers? Light it meant to be emitted from the sides of the keys.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!