Recommended Posts

I hear alot of people talk about Launchy.. But I just can't seem to get into it, having to type out the program I wanted to launch just seemed like I could get the same thing by typing it in the Vista Search bar..

Am I missing something on it though? Or am I correct?

You are quite correct. My desktop PC is a Linux machine, and I spend a great deal of time in the terminal. For that reason, I'm more accustomed to typing things out and using keyboard shortcuts than waiting for my entire hand to move a single piece of equipment, then clicking to open a menu, move over the right menu item, making sure I don't pass it up, and then moving to the sub-item that I want to click on. With the mouse, it is too much "lather-rinse-repeat" action for me. I prefer to type `firefox' in Launchy than going to Start->[All] Programs->Mozilla Firefox->Mozilla Firefox, even with the zero-delay registry tweak for menu popups when hovering over a menu. The same is said of many programs that I use.

If I understand correctly, a dock has the exact same purpose as the Quick Launch bar: it allows you to easily access your most commonly used items. It is easier for me to type things because I prefer access to most of my system rather than just a few icons, a trait that I carried over from Linux. In addition, Launchy has tab-completion, just like any modern command shell, so if I need to access something out-of-the-ordinary, it's just a few keys away. I also am able to pass command-line arguments too. Once I find a program, and its name is complete, I just need to press the Tab key to add command-line arguments. Just remember that something like Launchy doesn't suit everybody. I disliked Launchy at first, but then I went back to it after nothing else felt right. I did the same with RocketDock because after ditching it the first time, I realized that I couldn't live without the convenience.

My main reason for using Launchy is because it can be used as a power tool. The following line opens up the specified URL under my `WebDev' profile in Firefox, regardless of any other Firefox profile that is already open:

firefox -P WebDev -no-remote http://www.example.com/

Not everybody needs to use that, of course. However, typing `F TAB ENTER' to launch Firefox with my default profile is pretty convenient for me. ^_^

Which would you say matters to you guys more? Performance (smoothness/speed of the program) or how much memory it uses?

Performance/speed of program. I'm using object dock right now it just seems much more smooth than rocketdock.

I like the "I paid for this ram please use it" option.

Edit: Plus I like the weather docklet.

I prefer that Rocketdock's bounce effect isn't as high and seems better, however, Objectdock allows for multiple docks and with dual 24" screens that is a necessity.

Unfortunately my specs are probably too high to notice any performance impacts.

Hey guys,

For those of you who use RocketDock instead of ObjectDock, why do you prefer RocketDock over ObjectDock.

And..

For those of you who use ObjectDock instead of RocketDock, why do you prefer ObjectDock over RocketDock.

Thanks!

Edit: Please be as specific as possible.

Add a poll to this mate so for us, the lazy, we don't have to go thru 3 pages to find out :)

cheers

docks aren't practical for windows IMO ,waste of resources . i dont use them

they just bog down the system and raise the likey hood of crashes

I disagree there, I found having a dock very practical. However, I did have my reasons for it. Problem is I had a crap video card (since upgraded the card though) and I wasn't able to run my games an native resolution and as a result every time I played a game all my icons would get scrunched into the corner of the screen, which I found very frustrating (as I have my icons all around the screen in groups). The Dock allowed me to kept all my icons together and they didn't go walkabout every time I played a game! To crashing and bogging down the system, I never really noticed that, I had no issues at all :D.

Obviously it's RocketDock I prefer :) primarily because it's free :p

Rocketdock FTW. I like the options of Object Dock with different docks for everything and folders and etc, but its too much on ram and cpu.

0-1% cpu (while hovering) and 3mb of ram is too much? What the hell are you running it on a PDA? I prefer ObjectDock. Last time I used RocketDock was quite a while ago and at the time it had a tendancy to crash, hang and generaly do as it pleased. After a couple of years of ObjectDock use I'm sort of biased. It just seems "better made" and rock solid stable. If I wasn't cheap I'd pay for the Plus version but the free one suits my needs fine.

Performance/speed of program. I'm using object dock right now it just seems much more smooth than rocketdock.

Same here. Plus, I can set it to be quite minimal, I don't like very large docks.

Edit: Plus I like the weather docklet.

Never worked with my city. :(

I prefer to type `firefox' in Launchy than going to Start->[All] Programs->Mozilla Firefox->Mozilla Firefox, even with the zero-delay registry tweak for menu popups when hovering over a menu. The same is said of many programs that I use.

Thanks for the reply explaining Launchy more..

But I need to find this zero-delay registry tweak you speak of. That would be great.

  • 1 year later...

I have been using OD but have recently started trying RD they both have theyr ups and downs, but for the most part I think I like Rd better. Other than the fact that RD does not show your system tray it is just as good as OD and loads much faster on startup... Someone had made a comment that stack docklet could not be used with OD. this is incorrect just load it into your docklets folder and will will appear in the "add docklets" list.............I have been using it for some time now. but as I said I am probably going to switch to RD....

Also as soon as funds are available I am chucking the entire pc world and heading across the rd to mac......... EMBRASSUR MON CUL Microsoft.....

I tried RocketDock a while ago, I don't remember why but I liked ObjectDock alot more. I completely replaced the Windows Taskbar with a dock... all my open windows, task tray etc is in my dock. I can't live without it! lol

EMBRASSUR MON CUL Microsoft

lol! you spelled it wrong but still funny. i won't say the translation.

I tried RocketDock a while ago, I don't remember why but I liked ObjectDock alot more. I completely replaced the Windows Taskbar with a dock... all my open windows, task tray etc is in my dock. I can't live without it! lol

lol! you spelled it wrong but still funny. i won't say the translation.

LOL close enough thou ;)

LOL close enough thou ;)

Well for me I have to say Object Dock. I've tried Rocket Dock and it just didn't appeal to me at all. I've tried using Object Dock in the past years ago but, I found myself uninstalling it. but now I use it all the time.

Changing icons and such for rocket dock proved for me to be a bit of a pain and has options I know I would never bother using.

Object Dock I feel is much easier to customize for my needs as getting rid of clutter and having to use the start menu for things I do so I'd say it's the dock for me and I have had no issues with performance what so ever it does slow down my desktop load time either. I also like the fact it comes with pre loaded icons too

  • 7 months later...

I am using ObjectDock because of the extra features, mainly because I can put up multiple docks. Also, it minimizes 64-bit windows, the main reason why I still can't hide my taskbar. It also has a killer weather docklet. If you would see my desktop, it would remind you guys about Copenhagen. ObjectDock is TEH SHIZ.

I am using ObjectDock because of the extra features, mainly because I can put up multiple docks. Also, it minimizes 64-bit windows, the main reason why I still can't hide my taskbar. It also has a killer weather docklet. If you would see my desktop, it would remind you guys about Copenhagen. ObjectDock is TEH SHIZ.

Edit: Not Copenhagen. I changed it to look even better. Sorry, but I didn't see an "Edit" button or I would edit my comment.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • How is everyone doing? My hobbies are gaming, sports (netball, tennis) and going to the gym. I also love cooking. Where are you guys from?
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!