Any1 help out a newbie. Trying hard to install Windows 3.1 on VM ware


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have this old piano teaching software that I used to use over a decade ago. I now have a one year old daughter and would love for her to someday try the same software I had. Im certain it used to run in Win 3.1

I already have VM ware but am not very fluent at it.

I have however set up a virtual Win 3.1 PC on it.

No matter what I do I cant get it to see my .iso file of win 3. I can select it from the CDROM window so the drive chooses that file but when i start the simulation i get a "windows - drive not ready" box and thats that.

If anyone could offer any direction Id be very grateful.

Hey, welcome to Neowin.

Now, do you have DOS installed on the VM before Windows? That's kind of a rule for Windows 3.1.

Hi there.

No, all as I have done is set VM ware away to make a win 3.1 virtual pc. I wrongly thought Win 3.1 would just be on there. Cant see a point in selecting win 3.1 otherwise.

I have an iso image or 7 dos disks but these are not floppy images. Cant work out how to make them into images to try.

I havent done a thing with VM ware so if it doesnt auto install then I havent done it.

Ok some progress made here after many hours of plugging away.

I have downloaded an img file of DOS 7. After loading this up my VM ware virtual PC can now see my CD drive. After another hour of finding out how to change the drive to the CD and yet another hour of finding out how to launch the thing (type setup.exe) I now am at yet another brick wall. You know, people slag windows off but really, it isnt that bad at all compared to DOS!!!!!

I have used Fdisk to format a virtual drive (I hope) another two hours to find out how to do this and marked the partition as active. Cant believe people had to do all this back then. Thank god I had an Amiga instead.

OK now when I type D:/setup.exe i am taken to the CD that works fine Im pleased to say, even if it took 5 hours to get this far (All of which takes seconds on windows - jeez)

Now the installer asks me where I want to install wind 3.1 too.

I tell it C:\windows and it tells me

"set up is unable to create the specified directory on the specified drive"

Is there any guru on here who can tell me what I am to do next. Ive already wasted half a day of my life with this yet I am determined.

If no one can I will continue to update this thread so other people may benefit but keep in mind I have no clue what the hell im doing here. Just researching for hours and pressing a few keys.

Unless someone replies and saves me, ill no doubt be back with an answer in 5 hours time

Ok, you've partitioned the drive using fdisk, did you format it?

Essentially you need to get to a state where the system can boot from the C drive without using any CD/Floppy images.

You need to make sure you've done the following before you can install Windows, this is the pretty complete list, where are you on it?

Partition the hard drive

Format the hard drive

Make the hard drive a system disk (bootable)

Install DOS

Setup the CD/Mouse drivers

Install Windows

(I think I know where you are, can you just type the following:

c: <enter>

dir <enter>

and post the results?

Thanks

if all this doesn't workout let us know what the software is, maybe we can help you get it running on another version of windows.

also if you are using vmware it should let you pick an iso image to boot from and when creating a virtual hard disk using the vmware wizard it will make and format the partition depending on which version of windows you choose... if you choose the older ones it will make you a Fat partition... otherwise NTFS partition....

if all this doesn't workout let us know what the software is, maybe we can help you get it running on another version of windows.

Yeah, I think Windows 3.1 applications can work using Windows 95 compatibility mode in XP.

  • 4 weeks later...

I thought about installing windows 3.11 in a virtual machine (was bored) a few months ago. When I read the OP I thought it would just be easier to get an appliance you can import in to vmware, and after a google search I came across this: http://wiki.oldos.org/Windows/InstallWFWinVMware

Its not exactly what I was looking for instead its a guide on installing. I didn't read all of it, but it looks decent to start.

EDIT: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...682882&st=0

Edited by Zirus
I thought about installing windows 3.11 in a virtual machine (was bored) a few months ago. When I read the OP I thought it would just be easier to get an appliance you can import in to vmware, and after a google search I came across this: http://wiki.oldos.org/Windows/InstallWFWinVMware

Its not exactly what I was looking for instead its a guide on installing. I didn't read all of it, but it looks decent to start.

EDIT: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...682882&st=0

You quoted my thread! I also tried to achieve a similar thing, I finally got it, and then quickly lost interest. It is interesting for learning and historical purposes. Perhaps to aid in learning legacy systems archaeology..

...although Microsoft only recently stopped licensing Windows 3.11 Embedded. :D

  • 2 weeks later...

I think I should call child protection services. You want to subject your one year old to Windows 3.11, thats TORTURE!!! :p

On a more serious note, have you tried running the program under something newer like Windows 95 or 98. I'd suspect both of those are much easier to install than 3.11.

On a more serious note, have you tried running the program under something newer like Windows 95 or 98. I'd suspect both of those are much easier to install than 3.11.

Even Windows 9x can't run some Windows 3.11 programs, though.

Have you tried Virtual PC? I used that to install Windows 3.11 a while ago.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!