WARNING: Saving PNG file with GIMP may brick mac mini!


Recommended Posts

Yes, it's true. Here's the story. I was going about my normal business on my recently acquired mac mini. I had just downloaded the latest itunes update, and I was working with GIMP to create a lovely new work of art. Now since I had installed the itunes update I had restarted my mac. Everything came up as normal, well except for itunes, which refused to start up along with Bowtie. It was not really a concern for me at the time, because I was listening to my ipod with my headphones, so I had no real need for itunes(aside from seeing any updated changes). I really didn't think much of it. I was focused on creating a new masterpiece(haha) in GIMP. Upon completing a rough copy of my work I saved it to the standard XCF file. Then I proceeded to save it as a PNG. This is where the trouble began. Upon saving it became evident that GIMP was unresponsive. I thought to myself ,"No big problem." and selected to "force quit" GIMP. STILL NO RESPONSE. Then I attempted to log out, and again I was prohibited because of GIMP. So I manually shutdown my computer and rebooted it. However, upon restarting my computer it was left rendered useless at the apple logo only to me taunted with the spinning loading circle of eternity.

Anyway, I hope to find out the cause as soon as I can activate Disk I.(unfortunately, I have no current way of doing this until I find a USB keyboard(mine was bluetooth))

You guys have any guess on my problem(if so swing away it could be anything.)?

P.S. I'm not too concerned(It's still under warranty), I just thought I'd share the story.

Looks like a gimp bug. Have the latest x11?

Originally when I downloaded GIMP and Inkscape the wouldn't even work. I asked around on here and someone gave me a link to X11, but I'm not sure how much the update. It's possible it was not up to date, but as far as I know it was current.

can't you fire it up into verbose mode like with osx86 darwin i think by using -v for diagnostics of booting ?

Without a Keyboard?

Oh wait you can't even log in? I didn't read all the way through. Pop in your Leopard disc and boot from it and then run disk utility and do a disk and permissions repair.

A friend said something about using Disk 1 to run a diagnostics test first. I think I'm just going to wait until tomorrow to "fix" it. (I wish I had a USB keyboard around here...)

You can use startup commands with the apple bt keyboard.

Hold down the option key with the 10.5 disc in the drive to select the boot device.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1343

That would be handy if I was using an apple bt keyboard, but actually I bought a Dell one off of ebay. :/ It's pretty cool though. I like it.

Sounds like a Hard Drive failure, it just so happened that you were using GIMP at the time that it occured, but would not be a GIMP problem (or else others would have reported it too)

Very well could be. I sure hope not. I had my homework on there! :(

this sounds like what happenend to me a while back when i was still using my mac mini. fortunately for me i had nothing important inside so i popped in the os x dvd and did a full wipe of my old installation. i have no idea how it happened or what caused it. it just sat at the apple logo for a long time and couldn't boot. surprisingly the hard disk was still perfectly fine when i reinstalled os x.

My friend came over and we fixed the problem. The test results didn't find anything wrong with the hardware or anything else for that matter. I had to reinstall MacOS, but that's about it. Fortunately, I was able to save all my files. I'm not really sure what went wrong, but my guess is that it had to do with either X11 or GIMP. The newest itunes update installed and itunes and my mac work fine, so that's why suspect GIMP or X11. Either way, it's working and I'm glad I don't have to send it in. The one thing I am frustrated about yet is that my printer was working just fine before and now it can't find the right driver. It's an Epson Stylus CX3810 if anyone has any suggestions.

I think it's more the Hard Shut Down that crashed your Mini.

It just append to have been done after the Gimp bug.

I'm thinking the hard shut down could have somehow damaged the directory structure on the hard drive, which can cause lots of weird issues (even if HFS+ is a journalized file system, I hate hard shut downs).

Yeah, something else happened there.

I had a similar situation, Firefox locked up and I tried to end it, didn't end so I tried logging off, couldn't log off and the system froze, restarted and it just sat on the Windows logo, turns out my hard drive controller had chosen that exact moment to end it's life.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!