• 0

My Website Design - Any Good? [UPDATED DESIGN]


Question

24/12/08 - I have updated the design yet again (still may not be good) after all of your helpful comments, but thought it would be best not to start a new thread. Please see this post further in the thread: Information on my updated design.

Original post (22/11/08):

I've only recently started learning the web design languages in my second year of university and have created a small website (as we have to create a whole forum from scratch by February :| lol).

Please let me know what you think of my whole design :) The colours, images, navigation, layout of content div, etc. Eventually I am thinking I would like to somehow add images to the border to make that a bit better, but other than that, I would really appreciate anybody's comments. Negative or positive... be as harsh as you like ;)

Link: http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/contact.php

Edited by cJr.

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I would say this: subtlety is a good thing. I would try fewer gradients with colors that weren't so clashing. Maybe start out with just solid colors and then add slight gradients to them, but not "look at me!" or "I'm 3D!" gradients, if that makes any sense.

  • 0

Thank you very much, all of you, for your honest opinions :) I completely forgot to validate it all before showing it to you, but that will be easy for me to do.

I will take all of your suggestions into account and will definitely improve upon it before I hand the forum in next year. Obviously the red is a bad idea :p so I will get rid of that completely. How many of you reckon I should keep the dark blue colour? Maybe add a slightly lighter blue in place of where all the red is? Or even add some white into the website and make the current blue much lighter?

I will definitely consider a whole new layout as well, although most people don't seem to mind that, it just seems to be the amount of effects on images and the over-use of red. Am I right?

Finally, I will need to code it so it works perfectly in all browsers. Currently I have only tested it in Firefox - bad idea :D

Thank you once again for all your opinions :) Keep them coming please in reply to this post. It's best to get all your opinions as you have more experience. I am just a beginner :)

P.S.

Not really, his images are no way optimized.

Thanks for letting me know. How do I optimise them? I'm very new to using Photoshop (you can probably tell :/ lol) and have not looked at any tutorials - just messed around myself. Is there a certain way I can optimise them? I've saved them all as .PNGs.

Thanks again :)

  • 0
Thanks for letting me know. How do I optimise them? I'm very new to using Photoshop (you can probably tell :/ lol) and have not looked at any tutorials - just messed around myself. Is there a certain way I can optimise them? I've saved them all as .PNGs.

Use JPG and compress them, find a balance between image quality and rate of compression. Use "Save as web", select image type to be JPG and just slide the compression to find the best image quality for smaller the size.

  • 0
no, don't like it, sorry. The colors are way out of my taste and your site shows up funky on a wide range of browsers

I agree now, the red is a mistake lol and maybe even the darkness of the blue. I may try some lighter colours? I've just checked it in Firefox, Opera, Safari and Internet Explorer. It works perfectly in Safari and Firefox and the only thing wrong with it in Opera and Internet Explorer is the "Back to Top" link at the bottom which I'm pretty sure I can sort out after looking at the W3C Markup Validation Service :) How else does it look funcky in a range of browsers?

Use JPG and compress them, find a balance between image quality and rate of compression. Use "Save as web", select image type to be JPG and just slide the compression to find the best image quality for smaller the size.

Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

  • 0
I agree now, the red is a mistake lol and maybe even the darkness of the blue. I may try some lighter colours? I've just checked it in Firefox, Opera, Safari and Internet Explorer. It works perfectly in Safari and Firefox and the only thing wrong with it in Opera and Internet Explorer is the "Back to Top" link at the bottom which I'm pretty sure I can sort out after looking at the W3C Markup Validation Service :) How else does it look funcky in a range of browsers?

Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

depends: if you want to save photos defenitely use jpeg. For all the rest, use PNG. Photoshop saves png relatively well, but to be sure you can use pngcrush or optipng to make them smaller

edit: just looked at your site in firefox, i thought it wasn't meant to be entirely red with some blue rectangles, that's why I said it looked funky.

  • 0
+1

edit: you should go http://www.designmeltdown.com/ and have a look and learn these site style.

Use kuler or similar sites to determine a good color scheme for your site with matching colors.

Thank you very much for both of those sites. They look very helpful so I will use them both to help decide my new colour scheme :)

  • 0
depends: if you want to save photos defenitely use jpeg. For all the rest, use PNG. Photoshop saves png relatively well, but to be sure you can use pngcrush or optipng to make them smaller

edit: just looked at your site in firefox, i thought it wasn't meant to be entirely red with some blue rectangles, that's why I said it looked funky.

Thank you for the tip, I will remember that.

And yeah, it's pretty bad that you thought my site looked 'funky' when it was working how it was supposed to, so maybe I do need to sort out the layout :D

  • 0
Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

nobody uses JPG anymore (except for real pictures). Use PNG and optimize the images.

I got these tools from some other forum a long time ago, recently revised it with information from yet another forum:

It was originally just the contents of Command.txt in a forum post, I copied that (NOT my work), downloaded all the exes into a folder, and wrote the bat script.

Read Commands.txt to get a brief explanation of it. There's a lot more details on the website of each tool.

The first half of the text file I put into the bat verbatim. The second half with pngout you only really need to run /f0 or /f5 depending on the image, but in the bat I just made it run all five filters, modify it to your need or run the commands manually.

Don't run pngout if it's a large image, it'll take forever. If you're running the bat you'll be able to terminate it after running the first half (close it when it pauses).

If you're obsessive with updates you might want to download the latest versions of all the exes, they probably haven't been updated since the package I attached though.

  • 0

Thank you Primexx :) When I finally come to finish my forum and website design, I will optimise all my images properly.

However, firstly, I have updated my website design again today :) (the reason I am developing this very slowly is because I have a lot of assignments to do for university which are currently more important).

I have taken everybody's opinions into account and you all made me realise I'd gone overboard with effects on the images and with the colours I used :D so I thank you greatly for that.

With this new design, I made all the effects on every image much more subtle, edited the border so it fits and looks better and also changed the whole colour scheme. I wanted a light skin and opted for more neutral colours (originally, the brown was orange, but it ended up looking too orange lol).

Please let me know what you think, your opinions were valued a lot last time and it definitely made me learn. I liked how honest everybody was. I imagine there are things I may still have to tweak on it (I just hope the brown isn't too 'disgusting' :p), but I think we can all agree that compared to the old design, it is improving :D

I decided to just put the new design on the one page for the time being as I reckon there may still need to be tweaks (maybe even a new colour scheme/layout? If this one still doesn't look good) :)

Here is the page with the new design: http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/index.php

Here is the old design to compare it to (the old design is also on any other link you click): http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/contact.php

  • 0
I really think you should go for some grays or whites...i'm not liking the tan either, also, the footer links are messed up in Opera.

Thanks :) I know Opera is the one browser I need to get it working properly in and it's just those footer links :/ lol. I'm sure I will figure it out when it comes to me doing my final design though :)

I was originally going to go for a white and light blue design but for some reason I got carried away and blasted out this :p There's a lot I like about this tan/peach/brown/whatever the hell colour it is lol, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks.

If everyone else finds it disgusting, I may go for the white and light blue design I was thinking of. It's just I'm bored of blue now... so many websites utilise it, it seems to be the most popular colour...

  • 0

You need to use much more subtle gradients, pick one colour and pick a slightly different hue of it. Red and blue was too harsh, so is caramel and white. Oddly, even with the harsh gradient, everything seems to blend together into a fairly bland look.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Works fine here too. About this build, I don't like to download any kind of Windows, from any site except Microsoft. The mod might work, but I don't know what it's inside. Can contain malware, backdoors... Long time ago I've used something like this but reversed - it was 98se with the look and some functionality  of XP. Or, later XP with Vista look. But I made it myself. Not downloaded from obscure sites.
    • Rockstar gives last-gen GTA V players free upgrades tomorrow by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Rockstar is preparing to launch Grand Theft Auto VI later this year, but ahead of that, the company has revealed a new offer for some Grand Theft Auto V owners. It today announced that Xbox One and PlayStation 4 version owners of the 2013-released title will soon be receiving a free upgrade to the current generation version. The studio released the Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 version of Grand Theft Auto V back in 2022, bringing significant upgrades to the original console editions. This included 60 FPS gameplay at up to 4K resolution, as well as major upgrades to textures, draw distance, and audio. Faster load times, ray tracing elements, and HDR support were also added with it. While this new and enhanced version needed a new purchase of the game to jump in, now Rockstar has decided to make it a free upgrade, dropping the $40 price tag entirely on consoles. "Beginning tomorrow, those who own any PS4 version or the digital Xbox One version of Grand Theft Auto V will be able to upgrade to the PS5 or Xbox Series X|S versions at no additional cost, and experience the best versions of GTA V and GTA Online," said the company in an official blog post. The free upgrade offer will be released tomorrow, June 18, for all Xbox One and PlayStation 4 owners of Grand Theft Auto V. Players who will be jumping in on the offer will want to check how to migrate their GTA Online profile from last-generation to current-generation consoles by heading over here. The offer lands ahead of The Kortz Center Heist hitting Grand Theft Auto Online, where players and crews will be tasked with stealing priceless international art from a prestigious gallery in Pacific Bluffs. It doesn't look like Rockstar plans to stop updating its previous game even with Grand Theft Auto VI being on the horizon. The latest title is slated to launch on November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5.
    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
    • Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta changelog: Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!