• 0

My Website Design - Any Good? [UPDATED DESIGN]


Question

24/12/08 - I have updated the design yet again (still may not be good) after all of your helpful comments, but thought it would be best not to start a new thread. Please see this post further in the thread: Information on my updated design.

Original post (22/11/08):

I've only recently started learning the web design languages in my second year of university and have created a small website (as we have to create a whole forum from scratch by February :| lol).

Please let me know what you think of my whole design :) The colours, images, navigation, layout of content div, etc. Eventually I am thinking I would like to somehow add images to the border to make that a bit better, but other than that, I would really appreciate anybody's comments. Negative or positive... be as harsh as you like ;)

Link: http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/contact.php

Edited by cJr.

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I would say this: subtlety is a good thing. I would try fewer gradients with colors that weren't so clashing. Maybe start out with just solid colors and then add slight gradients to them, but not "look at me!" or "I'm 3D!" gradients, if that makes any sense.

  • 0

Thank you very much, all of you, for your honest opinions :) I completely forgot to validate it all before showing it to you, but that will be easy for me to do.

I will take all of your suggestions into account and will definitely improve upon it before I hand the forum in next year. Obviously the red is a bad idea :p so I will get rid of that completely. How many of you reckon I should keep the dark blue colour? Maybe add a slightly lighter blue in place of where all the red is? Or even add some white into the website and make the current blue much lighter?

I will definitely consider a whole new layout as well, although most people don't seem to mind that, it just seems to be the amount of effects on images and the over-use of red. Am I right?

Finally, I will need to code it so it works perfectly in all browsers. Currently I have only tested it in Firefox - bad idea :D

Thank you once again for all your opinions :) Keep them coming please in reply to this post. It's best to get all your opinions as you have more experience. I am just a beginner :)

P.S.

Not really, his images are no way optimized.

Thanks for letting me know. How do I optimise them? I'm very new to using Photoshop (you can probably tell :/ lol) and have not looked at any tutorials - just messed around myself. Is there a certain way I can optimise them? I've saved them all as .PNGs.

Thanks again :)

  • 0
Thanks for letting me know. How do I optimise them? I'm very new to using Photoshop (you can probably tell :/ lol) and have not looked at any tutorials - just messed around myself. Is there a certain way I can optimise them? I've saved them all as .PNGs.

Use JPG and compress them, find a balance between image quality and rate of compression. Use "Save as web", select image type to be JPG and just slide the compression to find the best image quality for smaller the size.

  • 0
no, don't like it, sorry. The colors are way out of my taste and your site shows up funky on a wide range of browsers

I agree now, the red is a mistake lol and maybe even the darkness of the blue. I may try some lighter colours? I've just checked it in Firefox, Opera, Safari and Internet Explorer. It works perfectly in Safari and Firefox and the only thing wrong with it in Opera and Internet Explorer is the "Back to Top" link at the bottom which I'm pretty sure I can sort out after looking at the W3C Markup Validation Service :) How else does it look funcky in a range of browsers?

Use JPG and compress them, find a balance between image quality and rate of compression. Use "Save as web", select image type to be JPG and just slide the compression to find the best image quality for smaller the size.

Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

  • 0
I agree now, the red is a mistake lol and maybe even the darkness of the blue. I may try some lighter colours? I've just checked it in Firefox, Opera, Safari and Internet Explorer. It works perfectly in Safari and Firefox and the only thing wrong with it in Opera and Internet Explorer is the "Back to Top" link at the bottom which I'm pretty sure I can sort out after looking at the W3C Markup Validation Service :) How else does it look funcky in a range of browsers?

Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

depends: if you want to save photos defenitely use jpeg. For all the rest, use PNG. Photoshop saves png relatively well, but to be sure you can use pngcrush or optipng to make them smaller

edit: just looked at your site in firefox, i thought it wasn't meant to be entirely red with some blue rectangles, that's why I said it looked funky.

  • 0
+1

edit: you should go http://www.designmeltdown.com/ and have a look and learn these site style.

Use kuler or similar sites to determine a good color scheme for your site with matching colors.

Thank you very much for both of those sites. They look very helpful so I will use them both to help decide my new colour scheme :)

  • 0
depends: if you want to save photos defenitely use jpeg. For all the rest, use PNG. Photoshop saves png relatively well, but to be sure you can use pngcrush or optipng to make them smaller

edit: just looked at your site in firefox, i thought it wasn't meant to be entirely red with some blue rectangles, that's why I said it looked funky.

Thank you for the tip, I will remember that.

And yeah, it's pretty bad that you thought my site looked 'funky' when it was working how it was supposed to, so maybe I do need to sort out the layout :D

  • 0
Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

nobody uses JPG anymore (except for real pictures). Use PNG and optimize the images.

I got these tools from some other forum a long time ago, recently revised it with information from yet another forum:

It was originally just the contents of Command.txt in a forum post, I copied that (NOT my work), downloaded all the exes into a folder, and wrote the bat script.

Read Commands.txt to get a brief explanation of it. There's a lot more details on the website of each tool.

The first half of the text file I put into the bat verbatim. The second half with pngout you only really need to run /f0 or /f5 depending on the image, but in the bat I just made it run all five filters, modify it to your need or run the commands manually.

Don't run pngout if it's a large image, it'll take forever. If you're running the bat you'll be able to terminate it after running the first half (close it when it pauses).

If you're obsessive with updates you might want to download the latest versions of all the exes, they probably haven't been updated since the package I attached though.

  • 0

Thank you Primexx :) When I finally come to finish my forum and website design, I will optimise all my images properly.

However, firstly, I have updated my website design again today :) (the reason I am developing this very slowly is because I have a lot of assignments to do for university which are currently more important).

I have taken everybody's opinions into account and you all made me realise I'd gone overboard with effects on the images and with the colours I used :D so I thank you greatly for that.

With this new design, I made all the effects on every image much more subtle, edited the border so it fits and looks better and also changed the whole colour scheme. I wanted a light skin and opted for more neutral colours (originally, the brown was orange, but it ended up looking too orange lol).

Please let me know what you think, your opinions were valued a lot last time and it definitely made me learn. I liked how honest everybody was. I imagine there are things I may still have to tweak on it (I just hope the brown isn't too 'disgusting' :p), but I think we can all agree that compared to the old design, it is improving :D

I decided to just put the new design on the one page for the time being as I reckon there may still need to be tweaks (maybe even a new colour scheme/layout? If this one still doesn't look good) :)

Here is the page with the new design: http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/index.php

Here is the old design to compare it to (the old design is also on any other link you click): http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/contact.php

  • 0
I really think you should go for some grays or whites...i'm not liking the tan either, also, the footer links are messed up in Opera.

Thanks :) I know Opera is the one browser I need to get it working properly in and it's just those footer links :/ lol. I'm sure I will figure it out when it comes to me doing my final design though :)

I was originally going to go for a white and light blue design but for some reason I got carried away and blasted out this :p There's a lot I like about this tan/peach/brown/whatever the hell colour it is lol, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks.

If everyone else finds it disgusting, I may go for the white and light blue design I was thinking of. It's just I'm bored of blue now... so many websites utilise it, it seems to be the most popular colour...

  • 0

You need to use much more subtle gradients, pick one colour and pick a slightly different hue of it. Red and blue was too harsh, so is caramel and white. Oddly, even with the harsh gradient, everything seems to blend together into a fairly bland look.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!