• 0

My Website Design - Any Good? [UPDATED DESIGN]


Question

24/12/08 - I have updated the design yet again (still may not be good) after all of your helpful comments, but thought it would be best not to start a new thread. Please see this post further in the thread: Information on my updated design.

Original post (22/11/08):

I've only recently started learning the web design languages in my second year of university and have created a small website (as we have to create a whole forum from scratch by February :| lol).

Please let me know what you think of my whole design :) The colours, images, navigation, layout of content div, etc. Eventually I am thinking I would like to somehow add images to the border to make that a bit better, but other than that, I would really appreciate anybody's comments. Negative or positive... be as harsh as you like ;)

Link: http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/contact.php

Edited by cJr.

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I would say this: subtlety is a good thing. I would try fewer gradients with colors that weren't so clashing. Maybe start out with just solid colors and then add slight gradients to them, but not "look at me!" or "I'm 3D!" gradients, if that makes any sense.

  • 0

Thank you very much, all of you, for your honest opinions :) I completely forgot to validate it all before showing it to you, but that will be easy for me to do.

I will take all of your suggestions into account and will definitely improve upon it before I hand the forum in next year. Obviously the red is a bad idea :p so I will get rid of that completely. How many of you reckon I should keep the dark blue colour? Maybe add a slightly lighter blue in place of where all the red is? Or even add some white into the website and make the current blue much lighter?

I will definitely consider a whole new layout as well, although most people don't seem to mind that, it just seems to be the amount of effects on images and the over-use of red. Am I right?

Finally, I will need to code it so it works perfectly in all browsers. Currently I have only tested it in Firefox - bad idea :D

Thank you once again for all your opinions :) Keep them coming please in reply to this post. It's best to get all your opinions as you have more experience. I am just a beginner :)

P.S.

Not really, his images are no way optimized.

Thanks for letting me know. How do I optimise them? I'm very new to using Photoshop (you can probably tell :/ lol) and have not looked at any tutorials - just messed around myself. Is there a certain way I can optimise them? I've saved them all as .PNGs.

Thanks again :)

  • 0
Thanks for letting me know. How do I optimise them? I'm very new to using Photoshop (you can probably tell :/ lol) and have not looked at any tutorials - just messed around myself. Is there a certain way I can optimise them? I've saved them all as .PNGs.

Use JPG and compress them, find a balance between image quality and rate of compression. Use "Save as web", select image type to be JPG and just slide the compression to find the best image quality for smaller the size.

  • 0
no, don't like it, sorry. The colors are way out of my taste and your site shows up funky on a wide range of browsers

I agree now, the red is a mistake lol and maybe even the darkness of the blue. I may try some lighter colours? I've just checked it in Firefox, Opera, Safari and Internet Explorer. It works perfectly in Safari and Firefox and the only thing wrong with it in Opera and Internet Explorer is the "Back to Top" link at the bottom which I'm pretty sure I can sort out after looking at the W3C Markup Validation Service :) How else does it look funcky in a range of browsers?

Use JPG and compress them, find a balance between image quality and rate of compression. Use "Save as web", select image type to be JPG and just slide the compression to find the best image quality for smaller the size.

Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

  • 0
I agree now, the red is a mistake lol and maybe even the darkness of the blue. I may try some lighter colours? I've just checked it in Firefox, Opera, Safari and Internet Explorer. It works perfectly in Safari and Firefox and the only thing wrong with it in Opera and Internet Explorer is the "Back to Top" link at the bottom which I'm pretty sure I can sort out after looking at the W3C Markup Validation Service :) How else does it look funcky in a range of browsers?

Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

depends: if you want to save photos defenitely use jpeg. For all the rest, use PNG. Photoshop saves png relatively well, but to be sure you can use pngcrush or optipng to make them smaller

edit: just looked at your site in firefox, i thought it wasn't meant to be entirely red with some blue rectangles, that's why I said it looked funky.

  • 0
+1

edit: you should go http://www.designmeltdown.com/ and have a look and learn these site style.

Use kuler or similar sites to determine a good color scheme for your site with matching colors.

Thank you very much for both of those sites. They look very helpful so I will use them both to help decide my new colour scheme :)

  • 0
depends: if you want to save photos defenitely use jpeg. For all the rest, use PNG. Photoshop saves png relatively well, but to be sure you can use pngcrush or optipng to make them smaller

edit: just looked at your site in firefox, i thought it wasn't meant to be entirely red with some blue rectangles, that's why I said it looked funky.

Thank you for the tip, I will remember that.

And yeah, it's pretty bad that you thought my site looked 'funky' when it was working how it was supposed to, so maybe I do need to sort out the layout :D

  • 0
Thank you. I will do that when I edit all the images :) I was under the impression PNG was the most efficient format, but obviously not.

nobody uses JPG anymore (except for real pictures). Use PNG and optimize the images.

I got these tools from some other forum a long time ago, recently revised it with information from yet another forum:

It was originally just the contents of Command.txt in a forum post, I copied that (NOT my work), downloaded all the exes into a folder, and wrote the bat script.

Read Commands.txt to get a brief explanation of it. There's a lot more details on the website of each tool.

The first half of the text file I put into the bat verbatim. The second half with pngout you only really need to run /f0 or /f5 depending on the image, but in the bat I just made it run all five filters, modify it to your need or run the commands manually.

Don't run pngout if it's a large image, it'll take forever. If you're running the bat you'll be able to terminate it after running the first half (close it when it pauses).

If you're obsessive with updates you might want to download the latest versions of all the exes, they probably haven't been updated since the package I attached though.

  • 0

Thank you Primexx :) When I finally come to finish my forum and website design, I will optimise all my images properly.

However, firstly, I have updated my website design again today :) (the reason I am developing this very slowly is because I have a lot of assignments to do for university which are currently more important).

I have taken everybody's opinions into account and you all made me realise I'd gone overboard with effects on the images and with the colours I used :D so I thank you greatly for that.

With this new design, I made all the effects on every image much more subtle, edited the border so it fits and looks better and also changed the whole colour scheme. I wanted a light skin and opted for more neutral colours (originally, the brown was orange, but it ended up looking too orange lol).

Please let me know what you think, your opinions were valued a lot last time and it definitely made me learn. I liked how honest everybody was. I imagine there are things I may still have to tweak on it (I just hope the brown isn't too 'disgusting' :p), but I think we can all agree that compared to the old design, it is improving :D

I decided to just put the new design on the one page for the time being as I reckon there may still need to be tweaks (maybe even a new colour scheme/layout? If this one still doesn't look good) :)

Here is the page with the new design: http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/index.php

Here is the old design to compare it to (the old design is also on any other link you click): http://homepages.shu.ac.uk/~cjricha2/contact.php

  • 0
I really think you should go for some grays or whites...i'm not liking the tan either, also, the footer links are messed up in Opera.

Thanks :) I know Opera is the one browser I need to get it working properly in and it's just those footer links :/ lol. I'm sure I will figure it out when it comes to me doing my final design though :)

I was originally going to go for a white and light blue design but for some reason I got carried away and blasted out this :p There's a lot I like about this tan/peach/brown/whatever the hell colour it is lol, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks.

If everyone else finds it disgusting, I may go for the white and light blue design I was thinking of. It's just I'm bored of blue now... so many websites utilise it, it seems to be the most popular colour...

  • 0

You need to use much more subtle gradients, pick one colour and pick a slightly different hue of it. Red and blue was too harsh, so is caramel and white. Oddly, even with the harsh gradient, everything seems to blend together into a fairly bland look.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Microsoft officially launched its Copilot Cowork enterprise AI agent on June 16, 2026, switching to usage-based pricing on the same day it disclosed it is considering a Microsoft-hosted version of China's DeepSeek V4 as a lower-cost engine for the platform — a pairing that puts the company on a collision course with both its enterprise customers' security teams and a White House that has spent months trying to wall off Chinese AI from American infrastructure.................... https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318647/20260618/microsoft-eyes-deepseek-v4-copilot-cowork-what-azure-hosting-cannot-fix.htm  
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      592
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!