Why won't Apple let us sync out iPods/iPhones over Wi-Fi?


Recommended Posts

I own a iPod Classic 160gb and I use it for my car. Now, I would LOVE the wifi feature the zune has, but the thing is, i love my ipod more.

For those who keep there zune in there car, you cant charge it in your car unless you get a "cig lighter to usb" thing and then plug in your zune usb cable.

Also, for Sound, you use an AUX Cable, or FM Transmitter.

I find all that as a mess. Me, I have a iPod Ready Deck. Came with cable. Thats what I LOVE about the iPods. They are so widely used and known that even Stereo companys are making docks and cable for the iPod that come with there products.

I got a deck put in that was iPod Ready and came witht he cable. Now, my iPod is charged all the time and is played in best soudn quality. Better then FM Transmitter or Aux Cable.

Now if I had wifi syncing, I woudl be set.

So I would love these feature if it ever came out.

I own a iPod Classic 160gb and I use it for my car. Now, I would LOVE the wifi feature the zune has, but the thing is, i love my ipod more.

For those who keep there zune in there car, you cant charge it in your car unless you get a "cig lighter to usb" thing and then plug in your zune usb cable.

Also, for Sound, you use an AUX Cable, or FM Transmitter.

I find all that as a mess. Me, I have a iPod Ready Deck. Came with cable. Thats what I LOVE about the iPods. They are so widely used and known that even Stereo companys are making docks and cable for the iPod that come with there products.

I got a deck put in that was iPod Ready and came witht he cable. Now, my iPod is charged all the time and is played in best soudn quality. Better then FM Transmitter or Aux Cable.

Now if I had wifi syncing, I woudl be set.

So I would love these feature if it ever came out.

You find two cables to be a mess?

Also, the iPod generally will not provide better sound quality than a Zune. Sound quality is determined primarily by the songs, anyway. You aren't getting the best sound quality possible with the iPod or Zune unless all your music is ripped at a very high bit rate, such as 320 kbps.

You find two cables to be a mess?

In a car? Yes. A cigarette lighter is mostly located somewhere in the middle where as your aux cable is mostly somewhere in the dashboard. This means the cables have to go a long way to reach the device leaving a clutter behind.

Wifi is probably too slow, and it drains the battery fairly quickly. I always found it more interesting that Apple doesn't let people sync their iPhones over Bluetooth though, but only through iTunes.

As far as the Zune vs iPods:

I would get a HD-based Zune over an iPod Classic at this point - the Zune's UI is so much nicer looking than the iPod's, and unlike how Apple handles the upgrades on the Touch, they actually offer major FW updates for free. Another thing I find annoying with the newer iPods (like my Touch), is that Apple changed the dock connector, so that perfectly fine car adapter that works with my 5g iPod, but not my Touch or an iPod Classic, the dock connector shouldn't change, but Apple saw an easy way to nickle and time people.

As far has flash-based players goes, I still like the Touch more than other ones I've seen, even though Safari still crashes.

Do not question Steve Jobs. He knows what you need more than you do.

Believe it or not, there's some truth to this, LOL.

Apple tends to show us things we never knew we wanted. It's an unorthodox strategy, but it seems to work very well.

Think of the reduction in the market for aftermarket (licensed) cables if they did that. All those licensing dollars that wouldn't be rolling in...

You'll always need a cable to charge it so that's not the main reason for sure.

Believe it or not, there's some truth to this, LOL.

Apple tends to show us things we never knew we wanted. It's an unorthodox strategy, but it seems to work very well.

I don't know. Apple wants me to believe I don't need FireWire or optical drives, yet I do. They also want me to believe that iPhone is perfect as is and will not need to be jailbroken, yet this isn't true, either.

I don't know. Apple wants me to believe I don't need FireWire or optical drives, yet I do. They also want me to believe that iPhone is perfect as is and will not need to be jailbroken, yet this isn't true, either.

Ssshhhhh!! Not so loud! You'll sour the Kool-Aid!

And you'll just make HIM angry, and I hate when he gets angry. He'll put me in the "funroom" again. And I don't want to go back in there!!!! No nom-noms or delicious cakes in there at all!

:ike:

I have it on my Zune and I find it's a great feature. My dock is on the 3rd floor of my house and when I'm heading to the gym and I want to sync get a few new songs rather than get out of my car run up 3 stories and sync I can just sync from right there grab the songs and go.

So you're going to the gym to exercise, but you're too lazy to run up a couple steps? :laugh:

Did you happen to read the post directly above yours? That is a perfect example of why its useful.

Yes, I did read it. I'm not going to leave my expensive device in my car where it can get stolen. ;)

I don't know. Apple wants me to believe I don't need FireWire or optical drives, yet I do.

And where did you get that idea? Is it because one of their laptops doesn't have Firewire? Or because another model doesn't include an optical drive?

This kind of reminds of that other company who 10 years ago stopped using floppy disk drives and instead included WiFi as standard, years before everyone else. Oh, I'm sorry, that was Apple too.

And where did you get that idea? Is it because one of their laptops doesn't have Firewire? Or because another model doesn't include an optical drive?

This kind of reminds of that other company who 10 years ago stopped using floppy disk drives and instead included WiFi as standard, years before everyone else. Oh, I'm sorry, that was Apple too.

Two of their laptops don't offer FireWire. And it's the beginning of a trend. I wouldn't be surprised if the next iMac update leaves it out, too. Apple believes consumers don't need FireWire. Steve Jobs has stated that most consumer products now use USB 2 instead of FireWire. And Steve also believes that most people won't miss their optical drive.

Apple abandoning the floppy disk in favor of USB is different, because USB was a very viable alternative to floppy disks. But there is no viable alternative to FireWire for its uses, nor is there a viable alternative to an optical drive yet.

Wifi is probably too slow, and it drains the battery fairly quickly. I always found it more interesting that Apple doesn't let people sync their iPhones over Bluetooth though, but only through iTunes.

Huh? You are aware that Bluetooth is far, far slower than wifi, right? Bluetooth wouldn't be a whole lot better on battery life either, especially considering that it would have to be active much longer to transfer the same files.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
    • We had no idea as kids how much time and energy it took to be an adult 😅
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval by David Uzondu Image via @realDonalTrump (X) As OpenAI prepares the release of its next model, GPT 5.6, the White House has instructed the company to limit the distribution of the software to a small group of government-approved partners instead of the general public, as it has done with previous releases. According to The Information, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman sent an internal memo to staff on Thursday explaining that the federal government will approve access "customer by customer" during an initial preview phase. Altman noted in the communication that this restrictive rollout is "not [their] long-term model" for software deployment, and the company plans to work toward a "more sustainable" distribution method later. CNN said that both OpenAI and the Trump administration view the capabilities of GPT 5.6 on the same level as Anthropic's Mythos and that government officials intend to "collaborate with frontier AI labs to develop shared approaches for addressing the challenges of scaling this technology." The latest restriction comes just weeks after the US Commerce Department decided to restrict Fable, a version of Mythos with extra safety "guardrails" to prevent users from exploiting software vulnerabilities. Not long after the release, though, researchers at Amazon found a way to bypass these restrictions, prompting an aggressive response from federal authorities. The government ordered Anthropic to cut off access for non-US citizens located outside the US, non-US citizens living inside the US, and incredibly, even Anthropic's own foreign-born employees. Anthropic now appears to be building a workaround to resolve this compliance block with an update to its Privacy Policy that introduces a category called "Verification Data" to handle KYC and Digital IDs. This setup could mandate digital identity checks to filter users by nationality, requiring a government-issued ID and facial biometric data. Who knows? Maybe in the future, you would have to scan your US Passport or State ID to prove your citizenship before you are allowed to chat with Fable 5 (or any other model).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!