Best Buy really, really, really loves money


Best Buy  

136 members have voted

  1. 1. Your thoughts?

    • Money Pinching
      123
    • Worthwhile
      13


Recommended Posts

I thought Best Buy was crooked for hiring Canadians for their 888 help line in the US and making them pretend to be the "helpful" fellow American next door to them lol. Nothing surprises me about them anymore. Heard and dealt with enough stories while working for them to know not to do business with them.

Guys this is a games console, not a PC destined to do 1,000,000 things when turned on.

You turn it on, you follow on screen prompts. Microsoft purposely designed the OS so that when it's turned on it pretty much does everything for you with a walkthrough to get you playing and online.

And for the guy who said it "could be worth it to the consumer". How exactly do Best Buy land on $30? Riddle me that one. Seems like it's pulled out of thin air.

Next thing we'll have is packs of balloons being sold with a sticker saying "$5 to blow up your balloon for you, WE PROMISE IT'S DIFFICULT TO DO".

The market for this is non-existent. People buying into games consoles do not equate to the amount of people who choose to try out a PC, or are required to for work related tasks/necessity of getting on the internet, etc.

It's an absolute scam to make such a minimal task seem like it actually needs "professional" and paid help, of which it costs 30 frickin dollars!

Wish I got paid $30 every time the automated message came up on my 360 to say a firmware update is required, and all I need to do is push the big green A button.

How can you say for certain that no one will pay for this? There exist people who are so afraid of technology that they wouldn't mind shelling a few extra bucks to get everything set up. This may be the easiest thing in the world for forumers like us, but don't assume it's the same with others. That's just silly. Why do you think people go to the dealer to pay for oil changes. One could argue that changing oil is relatively an easy thing anybody can learn to do. If you told car enthusiasts that you just spent $35 for an oil change, a lot of them will scoff at you. "why didn't you do it yourself and save the money and pump your tires yourself?" But people who don't care, don't know about cars don't mind paying the extra money as they see value in that (convenience). It's the same here. Non-gamers would may see value in this (convenience). Whether it's worth $30 to you doesn't matter; what matters if it's worth $30 to them.

How can you say for certain that no one will pay for this? There exist people who are so afraid of technology that they wouldn't mind shelling a few extra bucks to get everything set up. This may be the easiest thing in the world for forumers like us, but don't assume it's the same with others. That's just silly. Why do you think people go to the dealer to pay for oil changes. One could argue that changing oil is relatively an easy thing anybody can learn to do. If you told car enthusiasts that you just spent $35 for an oil change, a lot of them will scoff at you. "why didn't you do yourself and save the money and pump your tires?" But people who don't care, don't know about cars don't mind paying the extra money as they see value in that (convenience). It's the same here. Non-gamers would may see value in this (convenience). Whether it's worth $30 to you doesn't matter; what matters if it's worth $30 to them.

It's a sad day if people are paying $30 for convenience reasons for something that takes hardly any of your time, and is actually part of your console experience.

And comparing a games console to an oil change is just stupid.

All Best Buy are doing is turning the console on and hitting a few buttons relating to on-screen prompts, that's it basically.

Let your kids do it, let your friends do it, let anyone else do it, but paying them $30 is laughable.

You don't buy your kids a games console for Christmas not to let them open it up and plug it in. Hell, primary school children can probably setup a 360 blind folded.

Not one person I know in my family/friends, casual and hardcore, have ever bought a games console and said to me I wish I had paid money to have this setup.

And for those stuck (after reading manuals) as I said, MS/Sony/Nintendo have you covered with their help lines, absolutely no need for BB to intervene.

Edited by Audioboxer

What's even funnier is that the people hired to turn on these consoles probably know nothing about them. It wouldn't surprise me if they hired a third party company to do it like they do with all their other services.

It's a sad day if people are paying $30 for convenience reasons for something that takes hardly any of your time, and is actually part of your console experience.

And comparing a games console to an oil change is just stupid.

All Best Buy are doing is turning the console on and hitting a few buttons relating to on-screen prompts, that's it basically.

Let your kids do it, let your friends do it, let anyone else do it, but paying them $30 is laughable.

You don't buy your kids a games console for Christmas not to let them open it up and plug it in. Hell, primary school children can probably setup a 360 blind folded.

Not one person I know in my family/friends, casual and hardcore, have ever bought a games console and said to me I wish I had paid money to have this setup.

And for those stuck (after reading manuals) as I said, MS/Sony/Nintendo have you covered with their help lines, absolutely no need for BB to intervene.

I don't remember my XBox 360 going through parental controls on its first boot wizard..maybe i forgot, it was awhile ago. I can see parents who want this feature and want to make sure it is setup right (as well as learn more about it) pay $30 to have someone show them.

I don't see a problem with that. Their offering a service, and its upto the consumers whether they want to use the service or not.

Yes, its a waste of money, if your a tech-geek like most of the people on this website. But for that 75 year old Grandmother buying her 9 year old a X360 for Christmas, she might consider having it setup before she wraps it up.

Those are the type of customers these services are aimed at, not your average computer geeks.

I don't see a problem with that. Their offering a service, and its upto the consumers whether they want to use the service or not.

Yes, its a waste of money, if your a tech-geek like most of the people on this website. But for that 75 year old Grandmother buying her 9 year old a X360 for Christmas, she might consider having it setup before she wraps it up.

Those are the type of customers these services are aimed at, not your average computer geeks.

Why would she do that?

All you do is plug the bloody thing in and it's ready to go :blink:

It's a games console, not a NASA space rocket.

[semi-joke]How else have all the other 9 year old swearing whining brats on Live had their 360's up and running before this BB plan?! Magic? :o[/semi-joke]

Why would she do that?

All you do is plug the bloody thing in and it's ready to go :blink:

It's a games console, not a NASA space rocket.

[semi-joke]How else have all the other 9 year old swearing whining brats on Live had their 360's up and running before this BB plan?! Magic? :o [/semi-joke]

If you want us all to agree with you that this whole thing is just silly and ridiculous, that is exactly what you are getting. It is a silly and ridiculous thing for people to waist their money on. I've probably lost more time commenting in this thread than the $30 spent to have an XBox 360 setup for me (because time is money).

Look, my point is, people spend their money on stupid ridiculous things all the time. I don't see a reason to go on for pages in an Internet forum discussing it (as I am obviously doing right now.)

Everyone here knows that it isn't a freaken space rocket and is extremely simple to setup. We get it. We understand your point. However, I think you give people too much credit. I'm sure there are a number of numb-skulls that, yes, believe it or not, need help setting up their game consoles. Kudos to Best Buy for figuring out a new way to make money from them.

I don't see any threads on Neowin that go on-and-on about how much money people waist playing the Lottery. At least there is SOME service here, so it isn't a COMPLETE waist of money.

I work in the media department at bestbuy and I haven't seen anything like this, I never even ask customers about geek squad when I help computer with their sales. It's a waste of breath, I don't get commision or anything so there's nothing to motivate me to screwing people out of their money. :D .

For example if somebody asks me they want an HDMI cable, I take them to the cheap dynex section instead of that overpriced garbage called monster. If it doesn't work then just bring it back within 30 days and get a new one. :)

I work in the media department at bestbuy and I haven't seen anything like this, I never even ask customers about geek squad when I help computer with their sales. It's a waste of breath, I don't get commision or anything so there's nothing to motivate me to screwing people out of their money. :D .

For example if somebody asks me they want an HDMI cable, I take them to the cheap dynex section instead of that overpriced garbage called monster. If it doesn't work then just bring it back within 30 days and get a new one. :)

That's because Best Buy Canada isn't nearly as crooked as the main company lol. Too bad you work there as many good companies could use helpful people like yourself and actually appreciate it too unlike BB.

Geek Squad is actually pretty good for alot of customers. New computer setup includes, Norton 360 (which sucks), Recovery CD's, Windows Updates, tweaks & customization, setup, and a few other things your average user cannot figure out how to do.

It's also a question of time. Most people want to open the box and be ready to go, no installing antiviruses, no updating every stupid program.

It's a service that is offered, and it is completely upto the customer to buy it or not.

Why would she do that?

All you do is plug the bloody thing in and it's ready to go :blink:

It's a games console, not a NASA space rocket.

Maybe the grandmother doesn't want her 9 year old playing "M" rated games. I'd wager that only about 80% of parents understand the ESRB ratings nevermind have the technical ability to set the parental controls.

Geek Squad is actually pretty good for alot of customers. New computer setup includes, Norton 360 (which sucks), Recovery CD's, Windows Updates, tweaks & customization, setup, and a few other things your average user cannot figure out how to do.

It's also a question of time. Most people want to open the box and be ready to go, no installing antiviruses, no updating every stupid program.

It's a service that is offered, and it is completely upto the customer to buy it or not.

geek squad are freaking morons ! i went in to my local best buy and ask how do i set up a slave HD .... the guy from the geek squad looked @ me like i was a 4 heading space mutant

The problem I have with charging for these kinds of services is that it continues to perpetrate the notion that computers are just too complex and technical for a normal person to figure out how to configure. I remember a few years back Dell running ads for their computers (and they appeal to the masses, of course) and them saying in their commercials 'Forget the Giga-this and Mega-that' just tell us want you want to do with your PC and we'll custom build it for you. That kind of mentality conditions people in general to think that just understanding the basics of a computer are too much for them, and that only technically-savvy people really know how to do anything. So companies continue to reinforce that mentality by charging money for this stuff. It's too hard for you to figure out how to do! So hard in fact, I need $30 to do it for you, even though it will only take about 20 minutes (if that).

That's just my opinion. But I've helped a lot of people who don't consider themselves to be tech-savvy to figure out how to do stuff on their computer they figured was just too hard to even think about, and when they learned it they were like, 'Hey, that's not so hard! Why does everybody make it out to be so difficult?' Because we still live in that Working With Computers Is For Nerds And Techies culture.

<End of Rant>

So hard in fact, I need $30 to do it for you, even though it will only take about 20 minutes (if that).

You have to remember that time is money. If it takes 20 minutes and it costs $30 then that works out to be $90/hr which is inline with what many professionals charge. Perhaps it is worth it for the customer to pay the $30 rather than spend 20 (or more) minutes of their own time trying to figure it out with the hope that they'll do it correctly. Perhaps the customers would rather spend their time billing their own customers than figuring out something from a manual or trying their patience on a tech support call.

for many of us this is outrageous, but there are many people out there willing to pay for a service like that, are they are stupid? no just not tech savy like us, but yes BB is greedy as hell

for many of us this is outrageous, but there are many people out there willing to pay for a service like that, are they are stupid? no just not tech savy like us, but yes BB is greedy as hell

Where do you draw the line though on "not tech savy" and "lazy"?

As said about 1,000,000 times everything you need to know about your 360 comes in the box - There is no advanced settings not already explained clearly and precisely. As I said, in comparison to a PC where you can pay for many setup services, a PC has so many possibilities you don't have explained to you in relevant documentation, a console does not.

Then for those unable to read an instruction manual, MS already have their help and support lines in place.

Why do BB need to intervene now after games consoles have been sold for god knows how many years? Was there a massive outcry from the 20m Xbox 360 owners about how they couldn't setup their 360? Uh, no, I doubt it.

It's just to generate cash out of, not the non-tech savy people, but the lazy or naive.

As for parental controls, the main parental control is not buying your 9 year old 18 rated games. The second is doing your own research by reading the manual that comes with the device you just bought.

Where do you draw the line though on "not tech savy" and "lazy"?

Not everyone buying an electronic device is a tech and not everyone refusing to set it up is lazy, for example my elder brother, he's 44, father of two, ages 12 and 7, he was very concerned about my nephews playing violent games so he called me to set up parental controls both in his Vista PC and Xbox 360, he works as an airline operations agent with a computer the whole day, so he's lazy? he's stupid? obviously not. I've told him it was really easy but he insisted, so if I wasn't available be sure that he had payed BB for the service

I have zero problem with this.

Both my older brother and my father bought PS3's, and came over to my house to see how I had mine all set up, and still were calling with questions. Heck, my dad made me come over to his house and fiddle around as to why he couldn't get 1080p. Turns out, his TV wasn't even 1080p capable (and he's resonably tech-savvy, pretty much where I get my inner-geek from).

Some peopel aren't tech or mechanically inclined. What comes easy to us (who have been hooking up consoles since Commodore and Atari) is just too much at once for people who get confused plugging in cable.

X-Station3s.

WTF is an "X-Station3"?? Is that supposed to be funny because it ironically portrays the Playstation 3 title? Or is the author of this article an idiot?

EDIT: Best Buy thinks they are being convenient by offering this service, not knowing the Xbox 360's manual has instructions on how to do all of that. This is just for those lazy people who don't feel like reading the manual, and have money to burn.

WTF is an "X-Station3"?? Is that supposed to be funny because it ironically portrays the Playstation 3 title? Or is the author of this article an idiot?

EDIT: Best Buy thinks they are being convenient by offering this service, not knowing the Xbox 360's manual has instructions on how to do all of that. This is just for those lazy people who don't feel like reading the manual, and have money to burn.

X-Station3 = "whatever gaming console I just bought you"

The price does seem outrageous (as do Geek Squad's prices) but then again, we routinely pay more than necessary for other services.

Many people go to a garage to have their car's oil changed (an oil change is not rocket science). Or go to restaurants and pay more than what a home-cooked meal with cost.

If it saves them time, sometimes spending a little more can be worth it for some people.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!