Ubisoft confirms Assassin's Creed 2


Recommended Posts

Assassin?s Creed has been one of Ubisoft?s best selling franchises, becoming their fastest selling new IP since 2002, with the game doing well even on the PC despite being leaked early on torrent sites. Thus it is not surprising to hear that the company is ?working hard? on a follow-up.

This was revealed in a conference call to analysts, and while no further details were shared, it is being rumored that the game has changed time frame from 1191 to ?several hundred years in the future,? most likely, the French Revolution in the 1700s. Additionally, it is also speculated that Ubisoft is aiming for a holiday 2009 launch of the game, but has been no official confirmation yet.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/703166-ubisoft-confirms-assassins-creed-2/
Share on other sites

Assassin?s Creed has been one of Ubisoft?s best sel franchises, becoming their fastest selling new IP si2002, with the game doing well even on the PC despite being leaked early on torrent sites. Thus it is not surprising to hear that the company is ?working hard? on a follow-up.

This was revealed in a conference call to analysts, and while no further details were shared, it is being rumored that the game has changed time frame from 1191 to ?several hundred years in the future,? most likely, the French Revolution in the 1700s. Additionally, it is also speculated that Ubisoft is aiming for a holiday 2009 launch of the game, but has been no official confirmation yet.

Franchise? 2002? Whaa

But yeah, it's no surprise there is a sequel in the works.

I probably should get around to playing Assassin's Creed 1 :p I've had it since Christmas 2007 and only played it for maybe 1 hour :p this is mainly cause it has a bit of a "stigma" about it, my 360 died on Christmas day after I played Assassin's Creed :p So been hesitant to play it since, stupid I know :laugh:

I already got this info about a month ago when I was talking with a friend of mine who works for Ubisoft Montreal. He mentioned to me that (as posted above) the game would take place in a different time period and it would also take place a couple months after Desmond was kidnapped.

i really liked the first one...yeah you ran around and did the same things over and over but i liked that. i am sick of games throwing curve balls at you every new lvl and you constantly having to adjust and not use your favorite techniques because the game wants you to try what they think is best. i got really creative with the first assassin's creed and didn't go in for the easy kill and run away... it was fun. really looking forward to a second release i want a sniper so bad.

I'd always thought this IP was planned as a trilogy anyway. Good news on the sequel, lets hope it improves on the original

I don't think it's a planned trilogy, but they definitely planned to make it a franchise. They were pretty clear about that.

First one was really good, I'm thinking of buying it again. A lot of the fun wasn't immediately apparent, it was something you had to find on your own (in my opinion).

I really enjoyed the timeframe and setting, not sure how it will translate to later times. I guess they way the gameplay was developed, it could fit anywhere but they are really going to have to work hard to use the French Revolution, I think.

Jus one thing.

SUBTITLES PLEASE!

This, plus no ridiculous story lines (unfortunately will probably be necessary to continue AC1), and no dire repetitive gameplay.

Then I'll be happy ;)

I'd always thought this IP was planned as a trilogy anyway. Good news on the sequel, lets hope it improves on the original

yes, it was mentioned that Assassin's Creed (in devblogs, I think) was a trilogy but not officially by Ubisoft. I guess it all depends on sales. Unlike Bioshock which is officially a trilogy plus movie franchise...

I enjoyed the first, the basic elements of it were great.

They just need to build upon them now, it reminded me of Spiderman 2, which while was great fun to play, you always came across the same random missions, Balloons, Robots and Thugs/Thieves were essentially it, which brought it down a bit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!