COD World at War or Gears of War 2?


COD WaW or Gears 2  

76 members have voted

  1. 1. What's better, Gears 2 or COD: WaW?

    • Gears of War 2
      56
    • Call of Duty: World at War
      20


Recommended Posts

Tough call. I beat both games. Albeit, COD was on the wii, which is done very good. I prefer it over the 360 version simply because of the far better controls.

Gears2, was a bit of a letdown for me. Hell I just bought another 360 primarily for gears2. I beat it in a couple days. I prefered the 1st one over it. It is very very easy. I didnt get any huge wow factors either, the first one there were plenty.

COD, well its a ww2 game..though done a bit differently. It really is a good game. The action is very intense especially the final level. Story wise..well its your typical ww2 shooter.

Id probably have to say get both. Both are worth playing..renting may be better for gears2 unless you want multiplayer. It can easily be beat in a few days.

So COD4 only has one mode?

No... CoD5 has only one mode and that mode is acting like CoD4. Besides the setting there is absolutely nothing different between the two games.

Tough call. I beat both games. Albeit, COD was on the wii, which is done very good. I prefer it over the 360 version simply because of the far better controls.

Gears2, was a bit of a letdown for me. Hell I just bought another 360 primarily for gears2. I beat it in a couple days. I prefered the 1st one over it. It is very very easy. I didnt get any huge wow factors either, the first one there were plenty.

COD, well its a ww2 game..though done a bit differently. It really is a good game. The action is very intense especially the final level. Story wise..well its your typical ww2 shooter.

Id probably have to say get both. Both are worth playing..renting may be better for gears2 unless you want multiplayer. It can easily be beat in a few days.

Did you play the gears campaign on casual? That is the only mode that I could see being "very very easy".

No... CoD5 has only one mode and that mode is acting like CoD4. Besides the setting there is absolutely nothing different between the two games.

Nope, absolutely nothing.

You know, COD5 is set in Modern Warfare, I forgot, well spotted (Y)

Nope, absolutely nothing.

You know, COD5 is set in Modern Warfare, I forgot, well spotted (Y)

please inform me of major differences besides that one is set in modern times and one went BACK to WWII. The oninline play i know for a fact is the same. all of the perks, classes, ranks etc.. are the same as they were in cod4.

please inform me of major differences besides that one is set in modern times and one went BACK to WWII. The oninline play i know for a fact is the same. all of the perks, classes, ranks etc.. are the same as they were in cod4.

:blink:

That IS the major difference you'd expect, what else are you looking for? Aliens? An offroad racer?

Play the campaign in COD4, then the campaign in COD5 and come back and tell me they are the same.

Online shares similarities, but please tell me any iteration to a series that VASTLY changes online (there may be a few yes). Don't "fix" what isn't broken, and if you are going to attempt to overhaul and **** it up, bye bye fans.

I guess you also missed the fact that COD5 does not have COD4 multiplayer maps, you know, maps, one of the most important things about an online experience.

:blink:

That IS the major difference you'd expect, what else are you looking for? Aliens? An offroad racer?

Play the campaign in COD4, then the campaign in COD5 and come back and tell me they are the same.

Online shares similarities, but please tell me any iteration to a series that VASTLY changes online (there may be a few yes). Don't "fix" what isn't broken, and if you are going to attempt to overhaul and **** it up, bye bye fans.

I guess you also missed the fact that COD5 does not have COD4 multiplayer maps, you know, maps, one of the most important things about an online experience.

so explain why if the modern warfare setting was such a popular setting, why did they change back to WWII? They "fixed" what didn't need to be fixed.

so explain why if the modern warfare setting was such a popular setting, why did they change back to WWII? They "fixed" what didn't need to be fixed.

And so is WW2 popular, unless you have forgotten about how many WW2 games there are/have been.

Okay online, people were whining viciously about going back to WW2, but look at COD4 sales. We're talking what, about 10 million or something across platforms? Many of the buyers of COD aren't the type of people who sit online going ape because it wasn't modern warfare again.

WW2 is already a proven success, the risk in doing a WW2 game is minimal, so you're not going to alienate your audience - Look at the COD5 sales.

how many of those sales do you suppose came form the success purely of cod4. Many people simply bought it because cod4 was a great game. You can't defend a game going back to WWII by saying its a minimal risk. As you stated before it's a series therefore it should follow in the same timeline.

how many of those sales do you suppose came form the success purely of cod4. Many people simply bought it because cod4 was a great game. You can't defend a game going back to WWII by saying its a minimal risk. As you stated before it's a series therefore it should follow in the same timeline.

And there's something wrong with that?

That's how game series work my friend. You build up a massive fanbase of loyal followers who keep buying iterations of your games because they got what they liked previously, and they expect your next game to follow suit again.

And no, a series does not need to strictly follow any timeline, especially not when the story campaign of each title is independent of each other.

And even when story does tie in, the MGS1-4 timeline goes

MGS3-MGS1-MGS2-MGS4 - But the games came out in the order 1-4.

Quite frankly the sour grapes over this going WW2 and being developed by Treyarch is off the wall, so basically, just stick with COD4 and wait on COD6. COD5 is a success and a good game, if you don't want to take part in it your decision.

However you're convincing no one the game is a failure, cause quite frankly it's not.

And there's something wrong with that?

That's how game series work my friend. You build up a massive fanbase of loyal followers who keep buying iterations of your games because they got what they liked previously, and they expect your next game to follow suit again.

And no, a series does not need to strictly follow any timeline, especially not when the story campaign of each title is independent of each other.

And even when story does tie in, the MGS1-4 timeline goes

MGS3-MGS1-MGS2-MGS4 - But the games came out in the order 1-4.

Quite frankly the sour grapes over this going WW2 and being developed by Treyarch is off the wall, so basically, just stick with COD4 and wait on COD6. COD5 is a success and a good game, if you don't want to take part in it your decision.

However you're convincing no one the game is a failure, cause quite frankly it's not.

I don't think it's a failure. I think that a person is better off buying cod4 because the games are too similar to be worth buying cod5.

Right ...

God the ignorance in this thread is slowly exceeding critical mass :rofl:

Pot, meet kettle?

Your criticisms of Gears of War 2 are an absolute joke. And I doubt you have played online since it was patched, given your statements.

Call of Duty: World at War's campaign is pathetically short and pales in comparison to Gears of War 2's. And to even argue that World at War's co-op campaign is remotely as enjoyable as Gears of War 2 through co-op is an absolute lie. The game does absolutely nothing new and is a weak clone of Call of Duty 4. Gears of War 2, on the other hand, actually took complaints about its campaign in Gears of War and went out and fixed them. What did World at War do? Make the A.I. even worse?

So after that it comes down to multiplayer and what you prefer... well, Gears of War 2's multiplayer is pretty damn awesome in my book. Call of Duty's, on the other hand, is the same old stuff I've come to expect from shooters. Gears of War 2 adds a strategic aspect to online shooters that I feel Call of Duty lacks.

Gears of War 2 improved upon the original Gears of War in almost every way, with the exception of multiplayer matchmaking not working very well at launch. It added more saves, more locations, better vehicle levels (but still not great, IMO), achievement progression, more multiplayer modes (that actually improve upon the previous ones) and an improved storyline. What did World at War offer? A trip back to World War II? Attack dogs? CTF's return? I mean, come on!

But, hey, don't take my word for it. Go look at the reviews on GameRankings or Metacritic and tell me which one beats the other by almost 10 points, on average.

Pot, meet kettle?

Your criticisms of Gears of War 2 are an absolute joke. And I doubt you have played online since it was patched, given your statements.

Call of Duty: World at War's campaign is pathetically short and pales in comparison to Gears of War 2's. And to even argue that World at War's co-op campaign is remotely as enjoyable as Gears of War 2 through co-op is an absolute lie. The game does absolutely nothing new and is a weak clone of Call of Duty 4. Gears of War 2, on the other hand, actually took complaints about its campaign in Gears of War and went out and fixed them. What did World at War do? Make the A.I. even worse?

So after that it comes down to multiplayer and what you prefer... well, Gears of War 2's multiplayer is pretty damn awesome in my book. Call of Duty's, on the other hand, is the same old stuff I've come to expect from shooters. Gears of War 2 adds a strategic aspect to online shooters that I feel Call of Duty lacks.

Gears of War 2 improved upon the original Gears of War in almost every way, with the exception of multiplayer matchmaking not working very well at launch. It added more saves, more locations, better vehicle levels (but still not great, IMO), achievement progression, more multiplayer modes (that actually improve upon the previous ones) and an improved storyline. What did World at War offer? A trip back to World War II? Attack dogs? CTF's return? I mean, come on!

But, hey, don't take my word for it. Go look at the reviews on GameRankings or Metacritic and tell me which one beats the other by almost 10 points, on average.

Spot on dude, I agree with pretty much everything you have said. Although I actually really enjoyed the vehicle parts in GoW2, although some of them felt like they went on for a little too long. Still, it was awesome the changes they made and how much it compares to Gears 1. If you buy into COD5 you pretty much support every other rehash thats released these days, you don't even have the grounds to complain about it imo. Its the same war over again, same old weapons and game modes, on top of the same engine and menus. Ugh the list goes on..COD5 is a joke imo :no:

There's nothing wrong with WW2 shooters, but when you straight up cut and paste a game from last year and change so little, its not acceptable. How can you defend something which is so blatantly a rehash of COD4 but then give other games by EA (for example Battlefield) so much **** :/

Definitely gonna null and void some people's opinions after a few discussions over the past week concerning rehashes with all this COD5 nonsense (N).

Pot, meet kettle?

Your criticisms of Gears of War 2 are an absolute joke. And I doubt you have played online since it was patched, given your statements.

Call of Duty: World at War's campaign is pathetically short and pales in comparison to Gears of War 2's. And to even argue that World at War's co-op campaign is remotely as enjoyable as Gears of War 2 through co-op is an absolute lie. The game does absolutely nothing new and is a weak clone of Call of Duty 4. Gears of War 2, on the other hand, actually took complaints about its campaign in Gears of War and went out and fixed them. What did World at War do? Make the A.I. even worse?

So after that it comes down to multiplayer and what you prefer... well, Gears of War 2's multiplayer is pretty damn awesome in my book. Call of Duty's, on the other hand, is the same old stuff I've come to expect from shooters. Gears of War 2 adds a strategic aspect to online shooters that I feel Call of Duty lacks.

Gears of War 2 improved upon the original Gears of War in almost every way, with the exception of multiplayer matchmaking not working very well at launch. It added more saves, more locations, better vehicle levels (but still not great, IMO), achievement progression, more multiplayer modes (that actually improve upon the previous ones) and an improved storyline. What did World at War offer? A trip back to World War II? Attack dogs? CTF's return? I mean, come on!

But, hey, don't take my word for it. Go look at the reviews on GameRankings or Metacritic and tell me which one beats the other by almost 10 points, on average.

It's almost sad you keep using a personal opinion as cold, hard facts and try to shove it down people's throat, really is Ayepecks. Never have I stated Gears of War 2 wasn't a good game! I have just stated, the BS you are currently saying about Call of Duty 5 could be applied to Gears of War 2 as well. Even most of what you stated I could argue goes for Call of Duty 5 as well because I like the game, you obviously don't.

Though I'm not going to argue with you, seen the members over the years argue with you and it's like running head first into a brick wall and you will probably use more personal opinions as facts :)

And I agree with Munky, many people's opinion are null and void for me after all this - his included though.

Its the same war over again, same old weapons and game modes, on top of the same engine and menus.

lolwhat?

You expect them to add laser guns to WW2?

You can't modify the past Munky, of course it has the same guns seen in past WW2 games.

Only in future war games can you make **** up.

Same war again? Wait, is one not taking place in WW2 and another in the future? It's also a different part of WW2 than most other WW2 shooters take part in, you'd know that if you played the SP campaign.

Same engine complaint? You expect them to build a new engine in a year?

Same menus? Yeah menus are the most important part of the game.

Same game modes? Just about every FPS game takes the same online modes, with minor iterations. Guess you forgot you don't call in a helicopter in COD5, or that you have a zombie mode, etc.

It truly is indeed the same exact same game.

Edited by Audioboxer
It's almost sad you keep using a personal opinion as cold, hard facts and try to shove it down people's throat, really is Ayepecks. Never have I stated Gears of War 2 wasn't a good game! I have just stated, the BS you are currently saying about Call of Duty 5 could be applied to Gears of War 2 as well. Even most of what you stated I could argue goes for Call of Duty 5 as well because I like the game, you obviously don't.

Though I'm not going to argue with you, seen the members over the years argue with you and it's like running head first into a brick wall and you will probably use more personal opinions as facts :)

And I agree with Munky, many people's opinion are null and void for me after all this - his included though.

I never said my opinion was any more valid than that of anyone else. But here you sit in multiple threads stating how much worse Gears of War 2 is, and how awesome Call of Duty: World at War is, yet you have yet to give a single reason why you think the game is better -- or even good! What point is an opinion thread if you don't share your opinions?

So, get on me all you want, but I'm only doing what the topic starter asked. If you don't want to have an honest discussion without getting your feelings hurt, that's fine by me. I've never once stated -- at any time -- that my opinion is better than any other opinion. Heck, I'm sure there are tons of people here that disagree with my opinion, but they'll at least give me that.

And no crap I will use more more personal opinions than facts... that is what this conversation is about! But notice how I used facts about what's changed to back up what I said? All you've done is say 'everything you said can be attributed to the inverse' and given absolutely NO justification for it.

Yes, I've debated/argued with many members here. But almost all of the time it's all in good fun, and no one gets their feelings hurt or is offended. Maybe you should stop resorting to personal slights and actually partake in the discussion at hand. Just wondering -- but can you even breathe up there atop your high horse with the air so thin? You're no better than me, and I'm no better than you, so get off it and discuss like a gentleman or don't discuss at all.

For the record: I don't think Call of Duty: World at War is a bad game. I just think it's a very bland one that does nothing to improve upon its predecessors, which should be the goal of almost any sequel or continuation of a series. The topic poster asked which one to get, though, so I made my opinion clear.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!