Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Coming


Recommended Posts

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/news/43345/Ca...equels-Revealed

Kind of "meh" to me. I was hoping for something all new from Infinity Ward, like the rumored sci-fi FPS they were working on. They make good games, though, so it's hard to complain. Not confirmed that it's them and not Treyarch making the game, though.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/705844-call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-coming/
Share on other sites

Good news, they better do a good job.

So they're going for a new CoD title every year? They better be careful. People will catch on to rehashed tricks after a while. However, I'll be glad to see the modern weapons returning.

Its two different studios releasing them every other year, giving them essentially 2 years dev time each, and they already have a next gen engine used in CoD4/WaW that was developed by these guys.

So It shouldn't be that bad, as long as they do something special next to WaW.

I'm just amazed people got mad at EA for doing Battlefield every so often, yet hardly anyone ever seems outraged at these Call of Duty games, and only half I'd say are really worth it -- same with Battlefield.

1) I'd have to kill someone if they created anything "Sci-fi", eugh!

2) EA is the synonym for crappy games, IW is not.

I hope battlefield 3 comes out sooner then later. World at war has to be one of the worse nerrated games I've come accross. Not only that but it comes off looking and playing and generally feeling like a really good mod of CoD 4 then a stand alone game. Imo, leave WW2 now to Brothers in Arms to finish. As for this next one, they better make something impressive or people are just going to go meh.

Also sci-fi version would be a very bad mistake. look at BF2142 compared to BF2, epic fail. That's the worst thing they could probably do to a traditionally realistic game series.

I'm looking forward to better gameplay and graphics as well as a new storyline. That, and a bunch of new weapons/perks. :)

PS: Infinity Ward better work on this one otherwise I'll... cry.

Give me COD: Vietnam or something. Treyarch should have a restraining order against approaching said franchise. COD4 was good, but I feel that modern warfare will soon become overused.

COD7: Future Warfare can simply foxtrot oscar.

I hope battlefield 3 comes out sooner then later.

I'm thinking BF3 is myth, BF2 has/d a large follower crowd however no show regarding info/teasers of a sequel (No 2142 does not count).

I really like COD4 however the maps are VERY small resulting in a arcade feeling rather than teamwork :-(.

I'm thinking BF3 is myth, BF2 has/d a large follower crowd however no show regarding info/teasers of a sequel (No 2142 does not count).

I really like COD4 however the maps are VERY small resulting in a arcade feeling rather than teamwork :-(.

Then you must be playing with the wrong team, me and some friends can execute military type maneuvers and tactics on 90% of all maps in COD 4 and rarely ever lose as a result.

Just sayin ;)

They should slow it down a bit.

Every 2 years or something, or rotate, one year COD, next year another game, then COD, etc - If they feel they have the skills to pump out titles.

You're used to seeing sports games every year, but I dunno if FPS titles can start going that way :/

Launching a game out every year will slow down how much it actually goes through evolution and is a significant step up, as opposed to being really just an "expansion pack". That's okay for sports games as they have no story script, they remain the same progression wise, just have better visuals/game play tweaks and new rosters.

Insomniac pump out a title every year, rotating between Resistance and other stuff, and while they constantly make solid titles, you sometimes think if they slowed it down a bit they'd be able to add those extra layers of polish.

Look at how ridiculous Killzone 2 is looking, and fair enough when released that will have like a 3/4 year development time period. However it shows that taking a bit longer can help, even if it's just 2 years as opposed to 1.

To be fair though, the COD crowd will lap up more of the same, so let's see how this progresses. Seeing as Treyarch made the last, this game "Warfare 2", will essentially have had 2 years in development I believe, or at least longer than a year. But if Infinity take over doing all COD games now, that will be them each year.

Every year is great!

Treyarch then IW, Treyarch then IW.

Get better games as a result as the developers spend 2 years on each title. COD4 Was awesome, WaW is awesome imo and I have no doubt that the next game will be awesome :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!